Cargando…
Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.””
In 2016, we published “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model. Measurement of Earth’s dragging of inertial frames [1]”, a measurement of frame-dragging, a fundamental prediction of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity, using the laser-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6303-1 |
_version_ | 1783398860669845504 |
---|---|
author | Ciufolini, Ignazio Pavlis, Erricos C. Ries, John Matzner, Richard Koenig, Rolf Paolozzi, Antonio Sindoni, Giampiero Gurzadyan, Vahe Penrose, Roger Paris, Claudio |
author_facet | Ciufolini, Ignazio Pavlis, Erricos C. Ries, John Matzner, Richard Koenig, Rolf Paolozzi, Antonio Sindoni, Giampiero Gurzadyan, Vahe Penrose, Roger Paris, Claudio |
author_sort | Ciufolini, Ignazio |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2016, we published “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model. Measurement of Earth’s dragging of inertial frames [1]”, a measurement of frame-dragging, a fundamental prediction of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity, using the laser-ranged satellites LARES, LAGEOS and LAGEOS 2. The formal error, or precision, of our test was about 0.2% of frame-dragging, whereas the systematic error was estimated to be about 5%. In the 2017 paper “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model by I. Ciufolini et al.”” by L. Iorio [2] (called I2017 in the following), it was incorrectly claimed that, when comparing different Earth’s gravity field models, the systematic error in our test due to the Earth’s even zonal harmonics of degree 6, 8, 10 could be as large as 15%, 6% and 36%, respectively. Furthermore, I2017 contains other, also incorrect, claims about the number of necessary significant decimal digits of the coefficients used in our test (claimed to be nine), in order to eliminate the largest uncertainties in the even zonals of degree 2 and 4, and about the non-repeatability of our test. Here we analyze and rebut those claims in I2017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6394275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63942752019-03-15 Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.”” Ciufolini, Ignazio Pavlis, Erricos C. Ries, John Matzner, Richard Koenig, Rolf Paolozzi, Antonio Sindoni, Giampiero Gurzadyan, Vahe Penrose, Roger Paris, Claudio Eur Phys J C Part Fields Reply In 2016, we published “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model. Measurement of Earth’s dragging of inertial frames [1]”, a measurement of frame-dragging, a fundamental prediction of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity, using the laser-ranged satellites LARES, LAGEOS and LAGEOS 2. The formal error, or precision, of our test was about 0.2% of frame-dragging, whereas the systematic error was estimated to be about 5%. In the 2017 paper “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model by I. Ciufolini et al.”” by L. Iorio [2] (called I2017 in the following), it was incorrectly claimed that, when comparing different Earth’s gravity field models, the systematic error in our test due to the Earth’s even zonal harmonics of degree 6, 8, 10 could be as large as 15%, 6% and 36%, respectively. Furthermore, I2017 contains other, also incorrect, claims about the number of necessary significant decimal digits of the coefficients used in our test (claimed to be nine), in order to eliminate the largest uncertainties in the even zonals of degree 2 and 4, and about the non-repeatability of our test. Here we analyze and rebut those claims in I2017. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-30 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6394275/ /pubmed/30881204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6303-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Funded by SCOAP3 |
spellingShingle | Reply Ciufolini, Ignazio Pavlis, Erricos C. Ries, John Matzner, Richard Koenig, Rolf Paolozzi, Antonio Sindoni, Giampiero Gurzadyan, Vahe Penrose, Roger Paris, Claudio Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.”” |
title | Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.”” |
title_full | Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.”” |
title_fullStr | Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.”” |
title_full_unstemmed | Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.”” |
title_short | Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.”” |
title_sort | reply to “a comment on “a test of general relativity using the lares and lageos satellites and a grace earth gravity model, by i. ciufolini et al.”” |
topic | Reply |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6303-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ciufoliniignazio replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal AT pavliserricosc replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal AT riesjohn replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal AT matznerrichard replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal AT koenigrolf replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal AT paolozziantonio replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal AT sindonigiampiero replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal AT gurzadyanvahe replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal AT penroseroger replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal AT parisclaudio replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal |