Cargando…

Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.””

In 2016, we published “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model. Measurement of Earth’s dragging of inertial frames [1]”, a measurement of frame-dragging, a fundamental prediction of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity, using the laser-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciufolini, Ignazio, Pavlis, Erricos C., Ries, John, Matzner, Richard, Koenig, Rolf, Paolozzi, Antonio, Sindoni, Giampiero, Gurzadyan, Vahe, Penrose, Roger, Paris, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6303-1
_version_ 1783398860669845504
author Ciufolini, Ignazio
Pavlis, Erricos C.
Ries, John
Matzner, Richard
Koenig, Rolf
Paolozzi, Antonio
Sindoni, Giampiero
Gurzadyan, Vahe
Penrose, Roger
Paris, Claudio
author_facet Ciufolini, Ignazio
Pavlis, Erricos C.
Ries, John
Matzner, Richard
Koenig, Rolf
Paolozzi, Antonio
Sindoni, Giampiero
Gurzadyan, Vahe
Penrose, Roger
Paris, Claudio
author_sort Ciufolini, Ignazio
collection PubMed
description In 2016, we published “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model. Measurement of Earth’s dragging of inertial frames [1]”, a measurement of frame-dragging, a fundamental prediction of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity, using the laser-ranged satellites LARES, LAGEOS and LAGEOS 2. The formal error, or precision, of our test was about 0.2% of frame-dragging, whereas the systematic error was estimated to be about 5%. In the 2017 paper “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model by I. Ciufolini et al.”” by L. Iorio [2] (called I2017 in the following), it was incorrectly claimed that, when comparing different Earth’s gravity field models, the systematic error in our test due to the Earth’s even zonal harmonics of degree 6, 8, 10 could be as large as 15%, 6% and 36%, respectively. Furthermore, I2017 contains other, also incorrect, claims about the number of necessary significant decimal digits of the coefficients used in our test (claimed to be nine), in order to eliminate the largest uncertainties in the even zonals of degree 2 and 4, and about the non-repeatability of our test. Here we analyze and rebut those claims in I2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63942752019-03-15 Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.”” Ciufolini, Ignazio Pavlis, Erricos C. Ries, John Matzner, Richard Koenig, Rolf Paolozzi, Antonio Sindoni, Giampiero Gurzadyan, Vahe Penrose, Roger Paris, Claudio Eur Phys J C Part Fields Reply In 2016, we published “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model. Measurement of Earth’s dragging of inertial frames [1]”, a measurement of frame-dragging, a fundamental prediction of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity, using the laser-ranged satellites LARES, LAGEOS and LAGEOS 2. The formal error, or precision, of our test was about 0.2% of frame-dragging, whereas the systematic error was estimated to be about 5%. In the 2017 paper “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth’s gravity model by I. Ciufolini et al.”” by L. Iorio [2] (called I2017 in the following), it was incorrectly claimed that, when comparing different Earth’s gravity field models, the systematic error in our test due to the Earth’s even zonal harmonics of degree 6, 8, 10 could be as large as 15%, 6% and 36%, respectively. Furthermore, I2017 contains other, also incorrect, claims about the number of necessary significant decimal digits of the coefficients used in our test (claimed to be nine), in order to eliminate the largest uncertainties in the even zonals of degree 2 and 4, and about the non-repeatability of our test. Here we analyze and rebut those claims in I2017. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-30 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6394275/ /pubmed/30881204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6303-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Funded by SCOAP3
spellingShingle Reply
Ciufolini, Ignazio
Pavlis, Erricos C.
Ries, John
Matzner, Richard
Koenig, Rolf
Paolozzi, Antonio
Sindoni, Giampiero
Gurzadyan, Vahe
Penrose, Roger
Paris, Claudio
Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.””
title Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.””
title_full Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.””
title_fullStr Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.””
title_full_unstemmed Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.””
title_short Reply to “A comment on “A test of general relativity using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites and a GRACE Earth gravity model, by I. Ciufolini et al.””
title_sort reply to “a comment on “a test of general relativity using the lares and lageos satellites and a grace earth gravity model, by i. ciufolini et al.””
topic Reply
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6303-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ciufoliniignazio replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal
AT pavliserricosc replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal
AT riesjohn replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal
AT matznerrichard replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal
AT koenigrolf replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal
AT paolozziantonio replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal
AT sindonigiampiero replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal
AT gurzadyanvahe replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal
AT penroseroger replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal
AT parisclaudio replytoacommentonatestofgeneralrelativityusingthelaresandlageossatellitesandagraceearthgravitymodelbyiciufolinietal