Cargando…

Tuberculosis screening among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India: is it worth the effort?

Background: The national tuberculosis (TB) programme in India recommends screening all pregnant women for TB, but this is rarely implemented. We carried out systematic TB screening among women attending the antenatal clinic of a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India, during February to A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vijayageetha, Mathavaswami, Kumar, Ajay MV, Ramakrishnan, Jayalakshmy, Sarkar, Sonali, Papa, Dasari, Mehta, Kedar, Joseph, Noyal M, Rajaram, Manju, Rajaa, Sathish, Chinnakali, Palanivel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30806593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1564488
_version_ 1783398865320280064
author Vijayageetha, Mathavaswami
Kumar, Ajay MV
Ramakrishnan, Jayalakshmy
Sarkar, Sonali
Papa, Dasari
Mehta, Kedar
Joseph, Noyal M
Rajaram, Manju
Rajaa, Sathish
Chinnakali, Palanivel
author_facet Vijayageetha, Mathavaswami
Kumar, Ajay MV
Ramakrishnan, Jayalakshmy
Sarkar, Sonali
Papa, Dasari
Mehta, Kedar
Joseph, Noyal M
Rajaram, Manju
Rajaa, Sathish
Chinnakali, Palanivel
author_sort Vijayageetha, Mathavaswami
collection PubMed
description Background: The national tuberculosis (TB) programme in India recommends screening all pregnant women for TB, but this is rarely implemented. We carried out systematic TB screening among women attending the antenatal clinic of a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India, during February to April 2018. Objective: To assess the number screened and number (proportion) with presumptive and active TB, and understand potential implementation from the healthcare providers’ perspective. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study. The quantitative phase was a cross-sectional study including 4203 pregnant women. Data were captured using a structured proforma. Any of the following symptoms constituted ‘presumptive TB’: any cough, haemoptysis, fever, weight loss, night sweats, neck swellings, joint pains, neck stiffness and disorientation. Those screening positive were referred for investigations and evaluation by a chest physician. The qualitative phase involved seven one-to-one interviews with healthcare providers. Manual thematic analysis was performed to generate themes. Results: Among 4203 women (two HIV-positive) screened, 77 (1.8%) had presumptive TB. Cough was the predominant symptom (n = 75). Only 12 women could produce a sputum sample, of whom one (0.02%) was diagnosed with active TB by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Challenges cited by healthcare providers were lack of awareness among clients and providers, high case load, lack of dedicated staff, perception that TB screening is a low-yield, low-priority activity and losses in the referral process. Suggested solutions were providing dedicated staff and space for screening, educating women to self-report using posters and videos, and creating a one-stop care provision. Conclusions: The TB yield among pregnant women was very low, calling into question the value of systematic screening in a low-HIV setting. However, the findings may not be generalizable. Evidence is urgently needed from primary and secondary care facilities. The challenges and solutions identified may help in optimizing the screening process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63942922019-03-04 Tuberculosis screening among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India: is it worth the effort? Vijayageetha, Mathavaswami Kumar, Ajay MV Ramakrishnan, Jayalakshmy Sarkar, Sonali Papa, Dasari Mehta, Kedar Joseph, Noyal M Rajaram, Manju Rajaa, Sathish Chinnakali, Palanivel Glob Health Action Original Article Background: The national tuberculosis (TB) programme in India recommends screening all pregnant women for TB, but this is rarely implemented. We carried out systematic TB screening among women attending the antenatal clinic of a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India, during February to April 2018. Objective: To assess the number screened and number (proportion) with presumptive and active TB, and understand potential implementation from the healthcare providers’ perspective. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study. The quantitative phase was a cross-sectional study including 4203 pregnant women. Data were captured using a structured proforma. Any of the following symptoms constituted ‘presumptive TB’: any cough, haemoptysis, fever, weight loss, night sweats, neck swellings, joint pains, neck stiffness and disorientation. Those screening positive were referred for investigations and evaluation by a chest physician. The qualitative phase involved seven one-to-one interviews with healthcare providers. Manual thematic analysis was performed to generate themes. Results: Among 4203 women (two HIV-positive) screened, 77 (1.8%) had presumptive TB. Cough was the predominant symptom (n = 75). Only 12 women could produce a sputum sample, of whom one (0.02%) was diagnosed with active TB by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Challenges cited by healthcare providers were lack of awareness among clients and providers, high case load, lack of dedicated staff, perception that TB screening is a low-yield, low-priority activity and losses in the referral process. Suggested solutions were providing dedicated staff and space for screening, educating women to self-report using posters and videos, and creating a one-stop care provision. Conclusions: The TB yield among pregnant women was very low, calling into question the value of systematic screening in a low-HIV setting. However, the findings may not be generalizable. Evidence is urgently needed from primary and secondary care facilities. The challenges and solutions identified may help in optimizing the screening process. Taylor & Francis 2019-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6394292/ /pubmed/30806593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1564488 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vijayageetha, Mathavaswami
Kumar, Ajay MV
Ramakrishnan, Jayalakshmy
Sarkar, Sonali
Papa, Dasari
Mehta, Kedar
Joseph, Noyal M
Rajaram, Manju
Rajaa, Sathish
Chinnakali, Palanivel
Tuberculosis screening among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India: is it worth the effort?
title Tuberculosis screening among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India: is it worth the effort?
title_full Tuberculosis screening among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India: is it worth the effort?
title_fullStr Tuberculosis screening among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India: is it worth the effort?
title_full_unstemmed Tuberculosis screening among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India: is it worth the effort?
title_short Tuberculosis screening among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, South India: is it worth the effort?
title_sort tuberculosis screening among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in puducherry, south india: is it worth the effort?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30806593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1564488
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayageethamathavaswami tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort
AT kumarajaymv tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort
AT ramakrishnanjayalakshmy tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort
AT sarkarsonali tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort
AT papadasari tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort
AT mehtakedar tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort
AT josephnoyalm tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort
AT rajarammanju tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort
AT rajaasathish tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort
AT chinnakalipalanivel tuberculosisscreeningamongpregnantwomenattendingatertiarycarehospitalinpuducherrysouthindiaisitworththeeffort