Cargando…
Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health
Background: In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country’s primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Exper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284 |
_version_ | 1783398869877391360 |
---|---|
author | Kringos, Dionne Nuti, Sabina Anastasy, Christian Barry, Margaret Murauskiene, Liubove Siciliani, Luigi De Maeseneer, Jan |
author_facet | Kringos, Dionne Nuti, Sabina Anastasy, Christian Barry, Margaret Murauskiene, Liubove Siciliani, Luigi De Maeseneer, Jan |
author_sort | Kringos, Dionne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country’s primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Expert Panel) to provide an opinion on ways for improving performance assessment of primary care. Objectives: To provide an overview of domains and dimensions to be taken into consideration in assessing primary care and specific indicators to be collected and analysed to improve understanding of primary care performance. Methods: A sub-group of the Expert Panel performed a literature review. The opinion was drafted, improved and approved through working-group discussions, consultations with the EC, the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment, and a public hearing. Results: Drawing on the main characteristics of primary care, we propose essential elements of a primary care performance assessment system based on specific indicators. We identified ten domains with accompanying dimensions for which comparative key indicators and descriptive indicators are proposed: (1) universal and accessible care, (2) integrated, (3) person-centred, (4) comprehensive and community-oriented care, (5) provided by a team accountable for addressing a vast majority of personal health needs, (6) sustained partnership with patients and informal caregivers, (7) coordination, (8) continuity of care, (9) primary care organization, and (10) human resources. Conclusion: The identified characteristics and criteria for development of a primary care performance assessment system provides a starting point for strengthening the coherence of assessment frameworks across countries and exchanging best practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6394311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63943112019-03-04 Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health Kringos, Dionne Nuti, Sabina Anastasy, Christian Barry, Margaret Murauskiene, Liubove Siciliani, Luigi De Maeseneer, Jan Eur J Gen Pract Original Article Background: In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country’s primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Expert Panel) to provide an opinion on ways for improving performance assessment of primary care. Objectives: To provide an overview of domains and dimensions to be taken into consideration in assessing primary care and specific indicators to be collected and analysed to improve understanding of primary care performance. Methods: A sub-group of the Expert Panel performed a literature review. The opinion was drafted, improved and approved through working-group discussions, consultations with the EC, the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment, and a public hearing. Results: Drawing on the main characteristics of primary care, we propose essential elements of a primary care performance assessment system based on specific indicators. We identified ten domains with accompanying dimensions for which comparative key indicators and descriptive indicators are proposed: (1) universal and accessible care, (2) integrated, (3) person-centred, (4) comprehensive and community-oriented care, (5) provided by a team accountable for addressing a vast majority of personal health needs, (6) sustained partnership with patients and informal caregivers, (7) coordination, (8) continuity of care, (9) primary care organization, and (10) human resources. Conclusion: The identified characteristics and criteria for development of a primary care performance assessment system provides a starting point for strengthening the coherence of assessment frameworks across countries and exchanging best practices. Taylor & Francis 2018-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6394311/ /pubmed/30539675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kringos, Dionne Nuti, Sabina Anastasy, Christian Barry, Margaret Murauskiene, Liubove Siciliani, Luigi De Maeseneer, Jan Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health |
title | Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health |
title_full | Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health |
title_fullStr | Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health |
title_full_unstemmed | Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health |
title_short | Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health |
title_sort | re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kringosdionne rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth AT nutisabina rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth AT anastasychristian rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth AT barrymargaret rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth AT murauskieneliubove rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth AT sicilianiluigi rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth AT demaeseneerjan rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth |