Cargando…

Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health

Background: In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country’s primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kringos, Dionne, Nuti, Sabina, Anastasy, Christian, Barry, Margaret, Murauskiene, Liubove, Siciliani, Luigi, De Maeseneer, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284
_version_ 1783398869877391360
author Kringos, Dionne
Nuti, Sabina
Anastasy, Christian
Barry, Margaret
Murauskiene, Liubove
Siciliani, Luigi
De Maeseneer, Jan
author_facet Kringos, Dionne
Nuti, Sabina
Anastasy, Christian
Barry, Margaret
Murauskiene, Liubove
Siciliani, Luigi
De Maeseneer, Jan
author_sort Kringos, Dionne
collection PubMed
description Background: In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country’s primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Expert Panel) to provide an opinion on ways for improving performance assessment of primary care. Objectives: To provide an overview of domains and dimensions to be taken into consideration in assessing primary care and specific indicators to be collected and analysed to improve understanding of primary care performance. Methods: A sub-group of the Expert Panel performed a literature review. The opinion was drafted, improved and approved through working-group discussions, consultations with the EC, the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment, and a public hearing. Results: Drawing on the main characteristics of primary care, we propose essential elements of a primary care performance assessment system based on specific indicators. We identified ten domains with accompanying dimensions for which comparative key indicators and descriptive indicators are proposed: (1) universal and accessible care, (2) integrated, (3) person-centred, (4) comprehensive and community-oriented care, (5) provided by a team accountable for addressing a vast majority of personal health needs, (6) sustained partnership with patients and informal caregivers, (7) coordination, (8) continuity of care, (9) primary care organization, and (10) human resources. Conclusion: The identified characteristics and criteria for development of a primary care performance assessment system provides a starting point for strengthening the coherence of assessment frameworks across countries and exchanging best practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63943112019-03-04 Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health Kringos, Dionne Nuti, Sabina Anastasy, Christian Barry, Margaret Murauskiene, Liubove Siciliani, Luigi De Maeseneer, Jan Eur J Gen Pract Original Article Background: In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country’s primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Expert Panel) to provide an opinion on ways for improving performance assessment of primary care. Objectives: To provide an overview of domains and dimensions to be taken into consideration in assessing primary care and specific indicators to be collected and analysed to improve understanding of primary care performance. Methods: A sub-group of the Expert Panel performed a literature review. The opinion was drafted, improved and approved through working-group discussions, consultations with the EC, the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment, and a public hearing. Results: Drawing on the main characteristics of primary care, we propose essential elements of a primary care performance assessment system based on specific indicators. We identified ten domains with accompanying dimensions for which comparative key indicators and descriptive indicators are proposed: (1) universal and accessible care, (2) integrated, (3) person-centred, (4) comprehensive and community-oriented care, (5) provided by a team accountable for addressing a vast majority of personal health needs, (6) sustained partnership with patients and informal caregivers, (7) coordination, (8) continuity of care, (9) primary care organization, and (10) human resources. Conclusion: The identified characteristics and criteria for development of a primary care performance assessment system provides a starting point for strengthening the coherence of assessment frameworks across countries and exchanging best practices. Taylor & Francis 2018-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6394311/ /pubmed/30539675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kringos, Dionne
Nuti, Sabina
Anastasy, Christian
Barry, Margaret
Murauskiene, Liubove
Siciliani, Luigi
De Maeseneer, Jan
Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health
title Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health
title_full Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health
title_fullStr Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health
title_full_unstemmed Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health
title_short Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health
title_sort re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284
work_keys_str_mv AT kringosdionne rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth
AT nutisabina rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth
AT anastasychristian rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth
AT barrymargaret rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth
AT murauskieneliubove rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth
AT sicilianiluigi rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth
AT demaeseneerjan rethinkingperformanceassessmentforprimarycareopinionoftheexpertpaneloneffectivewaysofinvestinginhealth