Cargando…

The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands

Background There is increasing interest in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. Objective To evaluate the added value of consultation of an infectious diseases expert team (consisting of two internist-infectious diseases specialists and a microbiologist) for advice regarding type, administ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijnakker, Roos, Visser, Loes E., Schippers, Emile F., Visser, Leo G., van Burgel, Nathalie D., van Nieuwkoop, Cees
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4
_version_ 1783398909921460224
author Wijnakker, Roos
Visser, Loes E.
Schippers, Emile F.
Visser, Leo G.
van Burgel, Nathalie D.
van Nieuwkoop, Cees
author_facet Wijnakker, Roos
Visser, Loes E.
Schippers, Emile F.
Visser, Leo G.
van Burgel, Nathalie D.
van Nieuwkoop, Cees
author_sort Wijnakker, Roos
collection PubMed
description Background There is increasing interest in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. Objective To evaluate the added value of consultation of an infectious diseases expert team (consisting of two internist-infectious diseases specialists and a microbiologist) for advice regarding type, administration route and duration of antibiotic treatment. Setting A retrospective case series was performed at the Haga Teaching Hospital, a 700-bed regional teaching hospital in The Hague, The Netherlands. Methods Complication rate and mortality was evaluated during 60 days of follow-up. Therapeutic rationality regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment was determined by presenting randomly selected paper cases from the database to two independent infectious diseases specialists who were blinded to patient’s treatment and outcomes. The concordance between the two advices were analysed using Cohen’s kappa. For those with discordance, an infectious diseases expert team meeting was organized to reach consensus. The final recommendation was compared to the actual given antibiotic treatment. Main outcome measure Discrepancy between the infectious disease expert team recommendations upon type, administration route and duration of antibiotics and the real outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment practice. Results Out of 89 included cases, 50 were randomly selected for review by the infectious diseases specialists. The kappa statistic regarding antimicrobial policy was 0.581 (P < 0.001). In 78% (39/50 cases), they had complete agreement upon all aspects of antibiotic treatment. The remaining 11 cases were reviewed by the expert team. Comparing the consensus of 50 cases to actual practice, in 14(28%) cases there was a discrepancy suggesting potential room for improvement. Comparing the cases in whom an individual infectious diseases specialist was involved in real practice to those cases without, there was 18% versus 42% discrepancy with the recommendations of the expert team (OR 3.4; 95% CI: 0.9–12.5, P = 0.06). Complication rate was 19% including unplanned readmissions and side effects of antimicrobial agent or administration route. Conclusion Though outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment policies in the Netherlands appear to be safe, consultation of an ID expert team, rather than an individual ID specialist, has the potential to optimize antimicrobial treatment in patients considered suitable for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63945042019-03-15 The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands Wijnakker, Roos Visser, Loes E. Schippers, Emile F. Visser, Leo G. van Burgel, Nathalie D. van Nieuwkoop, Cees Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background There is increasing interest in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. Objective To evaluate the added value of consultation of an infectious diseases expert team (consisting of two internist-infectious diseases specialists and a microbiologist) for advice regarding type, administration route and duration of antibiotic treatment. Setting A retrospective case series was performed at the Haga Teaching Hospital, a 700-bed regional teaching hospital in The Hague, The Netherlands. Methods Complication rate and mortality was evaluated during 60 days of follow-up. Therapeutic rationality regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment was determined by presenting randomly selected paper cases from the database to two independent infectious diseases specialists who were blinded to patient’s treatment and outcomes. The concordance between the two advices were analysed using Cohen’s kappa. For those with discordance, an infectious diseases expert team meeting was organized to reach consensus. The final recommendation was compared to the actual given antibiotic treatment. Main outcome measure Discrepancy between the infectious disease expert team recommendations upon type, administration route and duration of antibiotics and the real outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment practice. Results Out of 89 included cases, 50 were randomly selected for review by the infectious diseases specialists. The kappa statistic regarding antimicrobial policy was 0.581 (P < 0.001). In 78% (39/50 cases), they had complete agreement upon all aspects of antibiotic treatment. The remaining 11 cases were reviewed by the expert team. Comparing the consensus of 50 cases to actual practice, in 14(28%) cases there was a discrepancy suggesting potential room for improvement. Comparing the cases in whom an individual infectious diseases specialist was involved in real practice to those cases without, there was 18% versus 42% discrepancy with the recommendations of the expert team (OR 3.4; 95% CI: 0.9–12.5, P = 0.06). Complication rate was 19% including unplanned readmissions and side effects of antimicrobial agent or administration route. Conclusion Though outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment policies in the Netherlands appear to be safe, consultation of an ID expert team, rather than an individual ID specialist, has the potential to optimize antimicrobial treatment in patients considered suitable for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-11-26 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6394504/ /pubmed/30478489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wijnakker, Roos
Visser, Loes E.
Schippers, Emile F.
Visser, Leo G.
van Burgel, Nathalie D.
van Nieuwkoop, Cees
The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands
title The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands
title_full The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands
title_fullStr The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands
title_short The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands
title_sort impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the netherlands
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wijnakkerroos theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT visserloese theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT schippersemilef theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT visserleog theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT vanburgelnathalied theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT vannieuwkoopcees theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT wijnakkerroos impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT visserloese impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT schippersemilef impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT visserleog impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT vanburgelnathalied impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands
AT vannieuwkoopcees impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands