Cargando…
The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands
Background There is increasing interest in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. Objective To evaluate the added value of consultation of an infectious diseases expert team (consisting of two internist-infectious diseases specialists and a microbiologist) for advice regarding type, administ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4 |
_version_ | 1783398909921460224 |
---|---|
author | Wijnakker, Roos Visser, Loes E. Schippers, Emile F. Visser, Leo G. van Burgel, Nathalie D. van Nieuwkoop, Cees |
author_facet | Wijnakker, Roos Visser, Loes E. Schippers, Emile F. Visser, Leo G. van Burgel, Nathalie D. van Nieuwkoop, Cees |
author_sort | Wijnakker, Roos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background There is increasing interest in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. Objective To evaluate the added value of consultation of an infectious diseases expert team (consisting of two internist-infectious diseases specialists and a microbiologist) for advice regarding type, administration route and duration of antibiotic treatment. Setting A retrospective case series was performed at the Haga Teaching Hospital, a 700-bed regional teaching hospital in The Hague, The Netherlands. Methods Complication rate and mortality was evaluated during 60 days of follow-up. Therapeutic rationality regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment was determined by presenting randomly selected paper cases from the database to two independent infectious diseases specialists who were blinded to patient’s treatment and outcomes. The concordance between the two advices were analysed using Cohen’s kappa. For those with discordance, an infectious diseases expert team meeting was organized to reach consensus. The final recommendation was compared to the actual given antibiotic treatment. Main outcome measure Discrepancy between the infectious disease expert team recommendations upon type, administration route and duration of antibiotics and the real outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment practice. Results Out of 89 included cases, 50 were randomly selected for review by the infectious diseases specialists. The kappa statistic regarding antimicrobial policy was 0.581 (P < 0.001). In 78% (39/50 cases), they had complete agreement upon all aspects of antibiotic treatment. The remaining 11 cases were reviewed by the expert team. Comparing the consensus of 50 cases to actual practice, in 14(28%) cases there was a discrepancy suggesting potential room for improvement. Comparing the cases in whom an individual infectious diseases specialist was involved in real practice to those cases without, there was 18% versus 42% discrepancy with the recommendations of the expert team (OR 3.4; 95% CI: 0.9–12.5, P = 0.06). Complication rate was 19% including unplanned readmissions and side effects of antimicrobial agent or administration route. Conclusion Though outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment policies in the Netherlands appear to be safe, consultation of an ID expert team, rather than an individual ID specialist, has the potential to optimize antimicrobial treatment in patients considered suitable for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6394504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63945042019-03-15 The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands Wijnakker, Roos Visser, Loes E. Schippers, Emile F. Visser, Leo G. van Burgel, Nathalie D. van Nieuwkoop, Cees Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background There is increasing interest in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. Objective To evaluate the added value of consultation of an infectious diseases expert team (consisting of two internist-infectious diseases specialists and a microbiologist) for advice regarding type, administration route and duration of antibiotic treatment. Setting A retrospective case series was performed at the Haga Teaching Hospital, a 700-bed regional teaching hospital in The Hague, The Netherlands. Methods Complication rate and mortality was evaluated during 60 days of follow-up. Therapeutic rationality regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment was determined by presenting randomly selected paper cases from the database to two independent infectious diseases specialists who were blinded to patient’s treatment and outcomes. The concordance between the two advices were analysed using Cohen’s kappa. For those with discordance, an infectious diseases expert team meeting was organized to reach consensus. The final recommendation was compared to the actual given antibiotic treatment. Main outcome measure Discrepancy between the infectious disease expert team recommendations upon type, administration route and duration of antibiotics and the real outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment practice. Results Out of 89 included cases, 50 were randomly selected for review by the infectious diseases specialists. The kappa statistic regarding antimicrobial policy was 0.581 (P < 0.001). In 78% (39/50 cases), they had complete agreement upon all aspects of antibiotic treatment. The remaining 11 cases were reviewed by the expert team. Comparing the consensus of 50 cases to actual practice, in 14(28%) cases there was a discrepancy suggesting potential room for improvement. Comparing the cases in whom an individual infectious diseases specialist was involved in real practice to those cases without, there was 18% versus 42% discrepancy with the recommendations of the expert team (OR 3.4; 95% CI: 0.9–12.5, P = 0.06). Complication rate was 19% including unplanned readmissions and side effects of antimicrobial agent or administration route. Conclusion Though outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment policies in the Netherlands appear to be safe, consultation of an ID expert team, rather than an individual ID specialist, has the potential to optimize antimicrobial treatment in patients considered suitable for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-11-26 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6394504/ /pubmed/30478489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wijnakker, Roos Visser, Loes E. Schippers, Emile F. Visser, Leo G. van Burgel, Nathalie D. van Nieuwkoop, Cees The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands |
title | The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands |
title_full | The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands |
title_short | The impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the Netherlands |
title_sort | impact of an infectious disease expert team on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment in the netherlands |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0751-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wijnakkerroos theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT visserloese theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT schippersemilef theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT visserleog theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT vanburgelnathalied theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT vannieuwkoopcees theimpactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT wijnakkerroos impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT visserloese impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT schippersemilef impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT visserleog impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT vanburgelnathalied impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands AT vannieuwkoopcees impactofaninfectiousdiseaseexpertteamonoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtreatmentinthenetherlands |