Cargando…

Evaluation of Secondary Concentration Methods for Poliovirus Detection in Wastewater

Effective surveillance of human enteric viruses is critical to estimate disease prevalence within a community and can be a vital supplement to clinical surveillance. This study sought to evaluate simple, effective, and inexpensive secondary concentration methods for use with ViroCap™ filter eluate f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falman, Jill C., Fagnant-Sperati, Christine S., Kossik, Alexandra L., Boyle, David S., Meschke, John Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30612304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12560-018-09364-y
_version_ 1783398938303266816
author Falman, Jill C.
Fagnant-Sperati, Christine S.
Kossik, Alexandra L.
Boyle, David S.
Meschke, John Scott
author_facet Falman, Jill C.
Fagnant-Sperati, Christine S.
Kossik, Alexandra L.
Boyle, David S.
Meschke, John Scott
author_sort Falman, Jill C.
collection PubMed
description Effective surveillance of human enteric viruses is critical to estimate disease prevalence within a community and can be a vital supplement to clinical surveillance. This study sought to evaluate simple, effective, and inexpensive secondary concentration methods for use with ViroCap™ filter eluate for environmental surveillance of poliovirus. Wastewater was primary concentrated using cartridge ViroCap filters, seeded with poliovirus type 1 (PV1), and then concentrated using five secondary concentration methods (beef extract-Celite, ViroCap flat disc filter, InnovaPrep® Concentrating Pipette, polyethylene glycol [PEG]/sodium chloride [NaCl] precipitation, and skimmed-milk flocculation). PV1 was enumerated in secondary concentrates by plaque assay on BGMK cells. Of the five tested methods, PEG/NaCl precipitation and skimmed-milk flocculation resulted in the highest PV1 recoveries. Optimization of the skimmed-milk flocculation method resulted in a greater PV1 recovery (106 ± 24.8%) when compared to PEG/NaCl precipitation (59.5 ± 19.4%) (p = 0.004, t-test). The high PV1 recovery, short processing time, low reagent cost, no required refrigeration, and requirement for only standard laboratory equipment suggest that the skimmed-milk flocculation method would be a good candidate to be field-validated for secondary concentration of environmental ViroCap filter samples containing poliovirus. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12560-018-09364-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63946432019-03-15 Evaluation of Secondary Concentration Methods for Poliovirus Detection in Wastewater Falman, Jill C. Fagnant-Sperati, Christine S. Kossik, Alexandra L. Boyle, David S. Meschke, John Scott Food Environ Virol Original Paper Effective surveillance of human enteric viruses is critical to estimate disease prevalence within a community and can be a vital supplement to clinical surveillance. This study sought to evaluate simple, effective, and inexpensive secondary concentration methods for use with ViroCap™ filter eluate for environmental surveillance of poliovirus. Wastewater was primary concentrated using cartridge ViroCap filters, seeded with poliovirus type 1 (PV1), and then concentrated using five secondary concentration methods (beef extract-Celite, ViroCap flat disc filter, InnovaPrep® Concentrating Pipette, polyethylene glycol [PEG]/sodium chloride [NaCl] precipitation, and skimmed-milk flocculation). PV1 was enumerated in secondary concentrates by plaque assay on BGMK cells. Of the five tested methods, PEG/NaCl precipitation and skimmed-milk flocculation resulted in the highest PV1 recoveries. Optimization of the skimmed-milk flocculation method resulted in a greater PV1 recovery (106 ± 24.8%) when compared to PEG/NaCl precipitation (59.5 ± 19.4%) (p = 0.004, t-test). The high PV1 recovery, short processing time, low reagent cost, no required refrigeration, and requirement for only standard laboratory equipment suggest that the skimmed-milk flocculation method would be a good candidate to be field-validated for secondary concentration of environmental ViroCap filter samples containing poliovirus. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12560-018-09364-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-01-05 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6394643/ /pubmed/30612304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12560-018-09364-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Falman, Jill C.
Fagnant-Sperati, Christine S.
Kossik, Alexandra L.
Boyle, David S.
Meschke, John Scott
Evaluation of Secondary Concentration Methods for Poliovirus Detection in Wastewater
title Evaluation of Secondary Concentration Methods for Poliovirus Detection in Wastewater
title_full Evaluation of Secondary Concentration Methods for Poliovirus Detection in Wastewater
title_fullStr Evaluation of Secondary Concentration Methods for Poliovirus Detection in Wastewater
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Secondary Concentration Methods for Poliovirus Detection in Wastewater
title_short Evaluation of Secondary Concentration Methods for Poliovirus Detection in Wastewater
title_sort evaluation of secondary concentration methods for poliovirus detection in wastewater
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30612304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12560-018-09364-y
work_keys_str_mv AT falmanjillc evaluationofsecondaryconcentrationmethodsforpoliovirusdetectioninwastewater
AT fagnantsperatichristines evaluationofsecondaryconcentrationmethodsforpoliovirusdetectioninwastewater
AT kossikalexandral evaluationofsecondaryconcentrationmethodsforpoliovirusdetectioninwastewater
AT boyledavids evaluationofsecondaryconcentrationmethodsforpoliovirusdetectioninwastewater
AT meschkejohnscott evaluationofsecondaryconcentrationmethodsforpoliovirusdetectioninwastewater