Cargando…

Exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Many studies have examined the effects of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in children with Crohn’s disease (CD), but corticosteroids are considered a superior therapy and are frequently used in China. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of EEN with corticosteroids in treati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Yu, Chen, Kang-Chen, Chen, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0204-0
_version_ 1783398939028881408
author Yu, Yu
Chen, Kang-Chen
Chen, Jie
author_facet Yu, Yu
Chen, Kang-Chen
Chen, Jie
author_sort Yu, Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many studies have examined the effects of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in children with Crohn’s disease (CD), but corticosteroids are considered a superior therapy and are frequently used in China. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of EEN with corticosteroids in treating pediatric CD. METHODS: A comprehensive retrieval from medical databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Wanfang data, VIP and CNKI, was performed using the search terms “diet therapy”, “exclusive enteral nutrition”, “Crohn’s disease”, “inflammatory bowel diseases”, “child” and “pediatrics” from January 1990 to April 2017. RESULTS: We included 18 studies from 1329 identified sources in this meta-analysis. EEN was as effective as corticosteroids in inducing remission rate of children suffering from CD (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 0.90, 2.10; P = 0.14). Nevertheless, patients who received EEN were more likely to achieve both endoscopic mucosal healing (OR = 5.24; 95% CI 2.06, 13.37; P = 0.0005) and histological mucosal healing (OR = 4.78; 95% CI 1.89, 12.08; P = 0.0009) than those who received corticosteroids; the Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index was lower [mean difference (MD) = − 3.67; 95% CI − 4.91, − 2.43] and weight gain was higher (MD = 1.92; 95% CI 0.02, 3.83; P = 0.05) in those patients who received EEN than in those who received corticosteroids. No difference was found in relapse rate (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.25, 1.29; P = 0.18), height for age or body mass index between the patients treated with EEN and corticosteroids at the 1-year end point. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis reveals that there is no significant difference between EEN and corticosteroids in the efficacy of inducing remission rate of CD in a pediatric population, but EEN is superior to corticosteroids in improving short-term mucosal inflammation and reducing the PCDAI index. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12519-018-0204-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63946482019-03-15 Exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis Yu, Yu Chen, Kang-Chen Chen, Jie World J Pediatr Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Many studies have examined the effects of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in children with Crohn’s disease (CD), but corticosteroids are considered a superior therapy and are frequently used in China. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of EEN with corticosteroids in treating pediatric CD. METHODS: A comprehensive retrieval from medical databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Wanfang data, VIP and CNKI, was performed using the search terms “diet therapy”, “exclusive enteral nutrition”, “Crohn’s disease”, “inflammatory bowel diseases”, “child” and “pediatrics” from January 1990 to April 2017. RESULTS: We included 18 studies from 1329 identified sources in this meta-analysis. EEN was as effective as corticosteroids in inducing remission rate of children suffering from CD (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 0.90, 2.10; P = 0.14). Nevertheless, patients who received EEN were more likely to achieve both endoscopic mucosal healing (OR = 5.24; 95% CI 2.06, 13.37; P = 0.0005) and histological mucosal healing (OR = 4.78; 95% CI 1.89, 12.08; P = 0.0009) than those who received corticosteroids; the Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index was lower [mean difference (MD) = − 3.67; 95% CI − 4.91, − 2.43] and weight gain was higher (MD = 1.92; 95% CI 0.02, 3.83; P = 0.05) in those patients who received EEN than in those who received corticosteroids. No difference was found in relapse rate (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.25, 1.29; P = 0.18), height for age or body mass index between the patients treated with EEN and corticosteroids at the 1-year end point. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis reveals that there is no significant difference between EEN and corticosteroids in the efficacy of inducing remission rate of CD in a pediatric population, but EEN is superior to corticosteroids in improving short-term mucosal inflammation and reducing the PCDAI index. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12519-018-0204-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Singapore 2019-01-21 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6394648/ /pubmed/30666565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0204-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Yu, Yu
Chen, Kang-Chen
Chen, Jie
Exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis
title Exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis
title_full Exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis
title_short Exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis
title_sort exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0204-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yuyu exclusiveenteralnutritionversuscorticosteroidsfortreatmentofpediatriccrohnsdiseaseametaanalysis
AT chenkangchen exclusiveenteralnutritionversuscorticosteroidsfortreatmentofpediatriccrohnsdiseaseametaanalysis
AT chenjie exclusiveenteralnutritionversuscorticosteroidsfortreatmentofpediatriccrohnsdiseaseametaanalysis