Cargando…

Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution

The structure and organization of a species genome at a karyotypic level, and in interphase nuclei, have broad functional significance. Although regular sized chromosomes are studied extensively in this regard, microchromosomes, which are present in many terrestrial vertebrates, remain poorly explor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connor, Rebecca E., Kiazim, Lucas, Skinner, Ben, Fonseka, Gothami, Joseph, Sunitha, Jennings, Rebecca, Larkin, Denis M., Griffin, Darren K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-018-0685-6
_version_ 1783398947413295104
author O’Connor, Rebecca E.
Kiazim, Lucas
Skinner, Ben
Fonseka, Gothami
Joseph, Sunitha
Jennings, Rebecca
Larkin, Denis M.
Griffin, Darren K.
author_facet O’Connor, Rebecca E.
Kiazim, Lucas
Skinner, Ben
Fonseka, Gothami
Joseph, Sunitha
Jennings, Rebecca
Larkin, Denis M.
Griffin, Darren K.
author_sort O’Connor, Rebecca E.
collection PubMed
description The structure and organization of a species genome at a karyotypic level, and in interphase nuclei, have broad functional significance. Although regular sized chromosomes are studied extensively in this regard, microchromosomes, which are present in many terrestrial vertebrates, remain poorly explored. Birds have more cytologically indistinguishable microchromosomes (~ 30 pairs) than other vertebrates; however, the degree to which genome organization patterns at a karyotypic and interphase level differ between species is unknown. In species where microchromosomes have fused to other chromosomes, they retain genomic features such as gene density and GC content; however, the extent to which they retain a central nuclear position has not been investigated. In studying 22 avian species from 10 orders, we established that, other than in species where microchromosomal fusion is obvious (Falconiformes and Psittaciformes), there was no evidence of microchromosomal rearrangement, suggesting an evolutionarily stable avian genome (karyotypic) organization. Moreover, in species where microchromosomal fusion has occurred, they retain a central nuclear location, suggesting that the nuclear position of microchromosomes is a function of their genomic features rather than their physical size. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00412-018-0685-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63946842019-03-15 Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution O’Connor, Rebecca E. Kiazim, Lucas Skinner, Ben Fonseka, Gothami Joseph, Sunitha Jennings, Rebecca Larkin, Denis M. Griffin, Darren K. Chromosoma Original Article The structure and organization of a species genome at a karyotypic level, and in interphase nuclei, have broad functional significance. Although regular sized chromosomes are studied extensively in this regard, microchromosomes, which are present in many terrestrial vertebrates, remain poorly explored. Birds have more cytologically indistinguishable microchromosomes (~ 30 pairs) than other vertebrates; however, the degree to which genome organization patterns at a karyotypic and interphase level differ between species is unknown. In species where microchromosomes have fused to other chromosomes, they retain genomic features such as gene density and GC content; however, the extent to which they retain a central nuclear position has not been investigated. In studying 22 avian species from 10 orders, we established that, other than in species where microchromosomal fusion is obvious (Falconiformes and Psittaciformes), there was no evidence of microchromosomal rearrangement, suggesting an evolutionarily stable avian genome (karyotypic) organization. Moreover, in species where microchromosomal fusion has occurred, they retain a central nuclear location, suggesting that the nuclear position of microchromosomes is a function of their genomic features rather than their physical size. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00412-018-0685-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6394684/ /pubmed/30448925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-018-0685-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
O’Connor, Rebecca E.
Kiazim, Lucas
Skinner, Ben
Fonseka, Gothami
Joseph, Sunitha
Jennings, Rebecca
Larkin, Denis M.
Griffin, Darren K.
Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution
title Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution
title_full Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution
title_fullStr Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution
title_short Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution
title_sort patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-018-0685-6
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorrebeccae patternsofmicrochromosomeorganizationremainhighlyconservedthroughoutavianevolution
AT kiazimlucas patternsofmicrochromosomeorganizationremainhighlyconservedthroughoutavianevolution
AT skinnerben patternsofmicrochromosomeorganizationremainhighlyconservedthroughoutavianevolution
AT fonsekagothami patternsofmicrochromosomeorganizationremainhighlyconservedthroughoutavianevolution
AT josephsunitha patternsofmicrochromosomeorganizationremainhighlyconservedthroughoutavianevolution
AT jenningsrebecca patternsofmicrochromosomeorganizationremainhighlyconservedthroughoutavianevolution
AT larkindenism patternsofmicrochromosomeorganizationremainhighlyconservedthroughoutavianevolution
AT griffindarrenk patternsofmicrochromosomeorganizationremainhighlyconservedthroughoutavianevolution