Cargando…
Treatment of de Garengeot’s hernia: a meta-analysis
PURPOSE: de Garengeot’s hernia is a rare entity in which the appendix is located within a femoral hernia and is almost invariably encountered incarcerated in an emergency setting with concomitant appendicitis. In the literature, there are mostly single-case reports. The purpose of the present study...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30536122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1862-5 |
_version_ | 1783398950707920896 |
---|---|
author | Linder, S. Linder, G. Månsson, C. |
author_facet | Linder, S. Linder, G. Månsson, C. |
author_sort | Linder, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: de Garengeot’s hernia is a rare entity in which the appendix is located within a femoral hernia and is almost invariably encountered incarcerated in an emergency setting with concomitant appendicitis. In the literature, there are mostly single-case reports. The purpose of the present study was to perform a review of the literature to study the incidence, pathogenesis, demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory and radiological investigations, differential diagnosis, delay in diagnosis and treatment, operative findings, surgical technique, histological findings, the postoperative course, use of antibiotics, and complications regarding de Garengeot’s hernia. METHODS: A literature search was performed through PubMed with the following search terms, single or in combination: Garengeot, femoral hernia, and appendicitis. Additional references were also found within the articles, and two patients from Uppsala University Hospital were added. RESULTS: Between 1981 and 2016, 70 publications were identified, and with the additional two patients, the present series comprised 90 patients There were 75 women (median age 73.0 years) and 15 men (median age 78.0 years). On examination, an inguinal mass was found in 87 patients (97%), which was painful and the cause of primary complaint in 67 patients (74%): the median duration of symptoms was 3 days. Radiological investigations or ultrasound were performed in 67 patients (74%); computed tomography was the most accurate with a positive diagnosis in 23/34 patients. Appendicitis was found in 76 patients, gangrenous in 23, and perforated in 9. The surgical approach was inguinal in 76 patients, including 15 with concomitant laparotomy. The preperitoneal route was chosen in six patients, and laparoscopy alone in four patients. A mesh/plug was used in 22 patients (7/22 normal appendix) and suture repair in 59 (4/59 normal appendix: p < 0.01). Complications were analysed in 79 patients and occurred in 11%. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: de Garengeot’s hernia is rare, being indistinguishable from an incarcerated femoral hernia in general. A delay in surgery should be avoided but if needed, computed tomography may be used for differential diagnosis. Although there is no standard treatment, mesh material does not appear advisable in the presence of a perforation, and it is beneficial for the surgeons to perform their routine method rather than a specific technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6394699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63946992019-03-15 Treatment of de Garengeot’s hernia: a meta-analysis Linder, S. Linder, G. Månsson, C. Hernia Review PURPOSE: de Garengeot’s hernia is a rare entity in which the appendix is located within a femoral hernia and is almost invariably encountered incarcerated in an emergency setting with concomitant appendicitis. In the literature, there are mostly single-case reports. The purpose of the present study was to perform a review of the literature to study the incidence, pathogenesis, demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory and radiological investigations, differential diagnosis, delay in diagnosis and treatment, operative findings, surgical technique, histological findings, the postoperative course, use of antibiotics, and complications regarding de Garengeot’s hernia. METHODS: A literature search was performed through PubMed with the following search terms, single or in combination: Garengeot, femoral hernia, and appendicitis. Additional references were also found within the articles, and two patients from Uppsala University Hospital were added. RESULTS: Between 1981 and 2016, 70 publications were identified, and with the additional two patients, the present series comprised 90 patients There were 75 women (median age 73.0 years) and 15 men (median age 78.0 years). On examination, an inguinal mass was found in 87 patients (97%), which was painful and the cause of primary complaint in 67 patients (74%): the median duration of symptoms was 3 days. Radiological investigations or ultrasound were performed in 67 patients (74%); computed tomography was the most accurate with a positive diagnosis in 23/34 patients. Appendicitis was found in 76 patients, gangrenous in 23, and perforated in 9. The surgical approach was inguinal in 76 patients, including 15 with concomitant laparotomy. The preperitoneal route was chosen in six patients, and laparoscopy alone in four patients. A mesh/plug was used in 22 patients (7/22 normal appendix) and suture repair in 59 (4/59 normal appendix: p < 0.01). Complications were analysed in 79 patients and occurred in 11%. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: de Garengeot’s hernia is rare, being indistinguishable from an incarcerated femoral hernia in general. A delay in surgery should be avoided but if needed, computed tomography may be used for differential diagnosis. Although there is no standard treatment, mesh material does not appear advisable in the presence of a perforation, and it is beneficial for the surgeons to perform their routine method rather than a specific technique. Springer Paris 2018-12-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6394699/ /pubmed/30536122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1862-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Linder, S. Linder, G. Månsson, C. Treatment of de Garengeot’s hernia: a meta-analysis |
title | Treatment of de Garengeot’s hernia: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Treatment of de Garengeot’s hernia: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Treatment of de Garengeot’s hernia: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of de Garengeot’s hernia: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Treatment of de Garengeot’s hernia: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | treatment of de garengeot’s hernia: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30536122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1862-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linders treatmentofdegarengeotsherniaametaanalysis AT linderg treatmentofdegarengeotsherniaametaanalysis AT manssonc treatmentofdegarengeotsherniaametaanalysis |