Cargando…

Timing flexibility of oral NEPA, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)

PURPOSE: The administration timing of antiemetic and chemotherapeutic regimens is often determined by regulatory indications, based on registration studies. Oral NEPA, fixed combination of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK(1)RA) netupitant and the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 RA (5-HT(3)RA) palonose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baron-Hay, Sally, Aapro, Matti, Bernareggi, Alberto, Schwartzberg, Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30685793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-4640-8
_version_ 1783398953609330688
author Baron-Hay, Sally
Aapro, Matti
Bernareggi, Alberto
Schwartzberg, Lee
author_facet Baron-Hay, Sally
Aapro, Matti
Bernareggi, Alberto
Schwartzberg, Lee
author_sort Baron-Hay, Sally
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The administration timing of antiemetic and chemotherapeutic regimens is often determined by regulatory indications, based on registration studies. Oral NEPA, fixed combination of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK(1)RA) netupitant and the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 RA (5-HT(3)RA) palonosetron, is recommended to be administered approximately 60 min before chemotherapy. Reducing chair time for chemotherapy administration at oncology day therapy units would improve facility efficiency without compromising patient symptom management. The objective was to determine if oral NEPA can be administered closer to chemotherapy initiation without compromising patient symptom management. METHODS: NK(1) receptor occupancy (NK(1)RO) time course in the brain was determined using positron emission tomography; netupitant and palonosetron plasma concentration-time profiles were described by pharmacokinetic (PK) models; and the rate, extent, and duration of RO by netupitant and palonosetron were predicted by pharmacodynamic modeling. Clinical efficacy data from a pivotal study in cisplatin and oral NEPA-receiving patients were reviewed in the context of symptom management. RESULTS: Striatal 90% NK(1)RO, assumed to correlate with NK(1)RA antiemetic efficacy, was predicted at netupitant plasma concentration of 225 ng/mL, reached at 2.23 h following NEPA administration. Palonosetron 90% 5-HT(3)RO was predicted at a 188-ng/L plasma concentration, reached at 1.05 h postdose. The mean time to first treatment failure for the 1.5% of NEPA-treated patients without complete response receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy was 8 h. Antiemetic efficacy was sustained over 5 days despite the expected decrease of NK(1)RO and 5-HT(3)RO. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that administering oral NEPA closer to initiation of cisplatin administration would provide similar antiemetic efficacy. Prospective clinical validation is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63947112019-03-15 Timing flexibility of oral NEPA, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) Baron-Hay, Sally Aapro, Matti Bernareggi, Alberto Schwartzberg, Lee Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The administration timing of antiemetic and chemotherapeutic regimens is often determined by regulatory indications, based on registration studies. Oral NEPA, fixed combination of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK(1)RA) netupitant and the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 RA (5-HT(3)RA) palonosetron, is recommended to be administered approximately 60 min before chemotherapy. Reducing chair time for chemotherapy administration at oncology day therapy units would improve facility efficiency without compromising patient symptom management. The objective was to determine if oral NEPA can be administered closer to chemotherapy initiation without compromising patient symptom management. METHODS: NK(1) receptor occupancy (NK(1)RO) time course in the brain was determined using positron emission tomography; netupitant and palonosetron plasma concentration-time profiles were described by pharmacokinetic (PK) models; and the rate, extent, and duration of RO by netupitant and palonosetron were predicted by pharmacodynamic modeling. Clinical efficacy data from a pivotal study in cisplatin and oral NEPA-receiving patients were reviewed in the context of symptom management. RESULTS: Striatal 90% NK(1)RO, assumed to correlate with NK(1)RA antiemetic efficacy, was predicted at netupitant plasma concentration of 225 ng/mL, reached at 2.23 h following NEPA administration. Palonosetron 90% 5-HT(3)RO was predicted at a 188-ng/L plasma concentration, reached at 1.05 h postdose. The mean time to first treatment failure for the 1.5% of NEPA-treated patients without complete response receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy was 8 h. Antiemetic efficacy was sustained over 5 days despite the expected decrease of NK(1)RO and 5-HT(3)RO. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that administering oral NEPA closer to initiation of cisplatin administration would provide similar antiemetic efficacy. Prospective clinical validation is required. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-01-26 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6394711/ /pubmed/30685793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-4640-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Baron-Hay, Sally
Aapro, Matti
Bernareggi, Alberto
Schwartzberg, Lee
Timing flexibility of oral NEPA, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
title Timing flexibility of oral NEPA, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
title_full Timing flexibility of oral NEPA, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
title_fullStr Timing flexibility of oral NEPA, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
title_full_unstemmed Timing flexibility of oral NEPA, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
title_short Timing flexibility of oral NEPA, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)
title_sort timing flexibility of oral nepa, netupitant-palonosetron combination, administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (cinv)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30685793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-4640-8
work_keys_str_mv AT baronhaysally timingflexibilityoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetroncombinationadministrationforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingcinv
AT aapromatti timingflexibilityoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetroncombinationadministrationforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingcinv
AT bernareggialberto timingflexibilityoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetroncombinationadministrationforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingcinv
AT schwartzberglee timingflexibilityoforalnepanetupitantpalonosetroncombinationadministrationforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingcinv