Cargando…

Mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of RYGB and SG: similar, yet different

The worldwide obesity epidemic continues unabated, adversely impacting upon global health and economies. People with severe obesity suffer the greatest adverse health consequences with reduced life expectancy. Currently, bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for people with severe obesit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pucci, A., Batterham, R. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29730732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0892-2
_version_ 1783398964491452416
author Pucci, A.
Batterham, R. L.
author_facet Pucci, A.
Batterham, R. L.
author_sort Pucci, A.
collection PubMed
description The worldwide obesity epidemic continues unabated, adversely impacting upon global health and economies. People with severe obesity suffer the greatest adverse health consequences with reduced life expectancy. Currently, bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for people with severe obesity, resulting in marked sustained weight loss, improved obesity-associated comorbidities and reduced mortality. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the most common bariatric procedures undertaken globally, engender weight loss and metabolic improvements by mechanisms other than restriction and malabsorption. It is now clear that a plethora of gastrointestinal (GI) tract-derived signals plays a critical role in energy and glucose regulation. SG and RYGB, which alter GI anatomy and nutrient flow, impact upon these GI signals ultimately leading to weight loss and metabolic improvements. However, whilst highly effective overall, at individual level, post-operative outcomes are highly variable, with a proportion of patients experiencing poor long-term weight loss outcome and gaining little health benefit. RYGB and SG are markedly different anatomically and thus differentially impact upon GI signalling and bodyweight regulation. Here, we review the mechanisms proposed to cause weight loss following RYGB and SG. We highlight similarities and differences between these two procedures with a focus on gut hormones, bile acids and gut microbiota. A greater understanding of these procedure-related mechanisms will allow surgical procedure choice to be tailored to the individual to maximise post-surgery health outcomes and will facilitate the discovery of non-surgical treatments for people with obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63947632019-03-15 Mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of RYGB and SG: similar, yet different Pucci, A. Batterham, R. L. J Endocrinol Invest Review The worldwide obesity epidemic continues unabated, adversely impacting upon global health and economies. People with severe obesity suffer the greatest adverse health consequences with reduced life expectancy. Currently, bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for people with severe obesity, resulting in marked sustained weight loss, improved obesity-associated comorbidities and reduced mortality. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the most common bariatric procedures undertaken globally, engender weight loss and metabolic improvements by mechanisms other than restriction and malabsorption. It is now clear that a plethora of gastrointestinal (GI) tract-derived signals plays a critical role in energy and glucose regulation. SG and RYGB, which alter GI anatomy and nutrient flow, impact upon these GI signals ultimately leading to weight loss and metabolic improvements. However, whilst highly effective overall, at individual level, post-operative outcomes are highly variable, with a proportion of patients experiencing poor long-term weight loss outcome and gaining little health benefit. RYGB and SG are markedly different anatomically and thus differentially impact upon GI signalling and bodyweight regulation. Here, we review the mechanisms proposed to cause weight loss following RYGB and SG. We highlight similarities and differences between these two procedures with a focus on gut hormones, bile acids and gut microbiota. A greater understanding of these procedure-related mechanisms will allow surgical procedure choice to be tailored to the individual to maximise post-surgery health outcomes and will facilitate the discovery of non-surgical treatments for people with obesity. Springer International Publishing 2018-05-05 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6394763/ /pubmed/29730732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0892-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Pucci, A.
Batterham, R. L.
Mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of RYGB and SG: similar, yet different
title Mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of RYGB and SG: similar, yet different
title_full Mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of RYGB and SG: similar, yet different
title_fullStr Mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of RYGB and SG: similar, yet different
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of RYGB and SG: similar, yet different
title_short Mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of RYGB and SG: similar, yet different
title_sort mechanisms underlying the weight loss effects of rygb and sg: similar, yet different
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29730732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0892-2
work_keys_str_mv AT puccia mechanismsunderlyingtheweightlosseffectsofrygbandsgsimilaryetdifferent
AT batterhamrl mechanismsunderlyingtheweightlosseffectsofrygbandsgsimilaryetdifferent