Cargando…

Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements

3D joint kinematics can provide important information about the quality of movements. Optical motion capture systems (OMC) are considered the gold standard in motion analysis. However, in recent years, inertial measurement units (IMU) have become a promising alternative. The aim of this study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teufl, Wolfgang, Miezal, Markus, Taetz, Bertram, Fröhlich, Michael, Bleser, Gabriele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30817787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213064
_version_ 1783398984780349440
author Teufl, Wolfgang
Miezal, Markus
Taetz, Bertram
Fröhlich, Michael
Bleser, Gabriele
author_facet Teufl, Wolfgang
Miezal, Markus
Taetz, Bertram
Fröhlich, Michael
Bleser, Gabriele
author_sort Teufl, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description 3D joint kinematics can provide important information about the quality of movements. Optical motion capture systems (OMC) are considered the gold standard in motion analysis. However, in recent years, inertial measurement units (IMU) have become a promising alternative. The aim of this study was to validate IMU-based 3D joint kinematics of the lower extremities during different movements. Twenty-eight healthy subjects participated in this study. They performed bilateral squats (SQ), single-leg squats (SLS) and countermovement jumps (CMJ). The IMU kinematics was calculated using a recently-described sensor-fusion algorithm. A marker based OMC system served as a reference. Only the technical error based on algorithm performance was considered, incorporating OMC data for the calibration, initialization, and a biomechanical model. To evaluate the validity of IMU-based 3D joint kinematics, root mean squared error (RMSE), range of motion error (ROME), Bland-Altman (BA) analysis as well as the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) were calculated. The evaluation was twofold. First, the IMU data was compared to OMC data based on marker clusters; and, second based on skin markers attached to anatomical landmarks. The first evaluation revealed means for RMSE and ROME for all joints and tasks below 3°. The more dynamic task, CMJ, revealed error measures approximately 1° higher than the remaining tasks. Mean CMC values ranged from 0.77 to 1 over all joint angles and all tasks. The second evaluation showed an increase in the RMSE of 2.28°– 2.58° on average for all joints and tasks. Hip flexion revealed the highest average RMSE in all tasks (4.87°– 8.27°). The present study revealed a valid IMU-based approach for the measurement of 3D joint kinematics in functional movements of varying demands. The high validity of the results encourages further development and the extension of the present approach into clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6394915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63949152019-03-08 Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements Teufl, Wolfgang Miezal, Markus Taetz, Bertram Fröhlich, Michael Bleser, Gabriele PLoS One Research Article 3D joint kinematics can provide important information about the quality of movements. Optical motion capture systems (OMC) are considered the gold standard in motion analysis. However, in recent years, inertial measurement units (IMU) have become a promising alternative. The aim of this study was to validate IMU-based 3D joint kinematics of the lower extremities during different movements. Twenty-eight healthy subjects participated in this study. They performed bilateral squats (SQ), single-leg squats (SLS) and countermovement jumps (CMJ). The IMU kinematics was calculated using a recently-described sensor-fusion algorithm. A marker based OMC system served as a reference. Only the technical error based on algorithm performance was considered, incorporating OMC data for the calibration, initialization, and a biomechanical model. To evaluate the validity of IMU-based 3D joint kinematics, root mean squared error (RMSE), range of motion error (ROME), Bland-Altman (BA) analysis as well as the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) were calculated. The evaluation was twofold. First, the IMU data was compared to OMC data based on marker clusters; and, second based on skin markers attached to anatomical landmarks. The first evaluation revealed means for RMSE and ROME for all joints and tasks below 3°. The more dynamic task, CMJ, revealed error measures approximately 1° higher than the remaining tasks. Mean CMC values ranged from 0.77 to 1 over all joint angles and all tasks. The second evaluation showed an increase in the RMSE of 2.28°– 2.58° on average for all joints and tasks. Hip flexion revealed the highest average RMSE in all tasks (4.87°– 8.27°). The present study revealed a valid IMU-based approach for the measurement of 3D joint kinematics in functional movements of varying demands. The high validity of the results encourages further development and the extension of the present approach into clinical settings. Public Library of Science 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6394915/ /pubmed/30817787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213064 Text en © 2019 Teufl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Teufl, Wolfgang
Miezal, Markus
Taetz, Bertram
Fröhlich, Michael
Bleser, Gabriele
Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements
title Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements
title_full Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements
title_fullStr Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements
title_full_unstemmed Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements
title_short Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements
title_sort validity of inertial sensor based 3d joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6394915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30817787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213064
work_keys_str_mv AT teuflwolfgang validityofinertialsensorbased3djointkinematicsofstaticanddynamicsportandphysiotherapyspecificmovements
AT miezalmarkus validityofinertialsensorbased3djointkinematicsofstaticanddynamicsportandphysiotherapyspecificmovements
AT taetzbertram validityofinertialsensorbased3djointkinematicsofstaticanddynamicsportandphysiotherapyspecificmovements
AT frohlichmichael validityofinertialsensorbased3djointkinematicsofstaticanddynamicsportandphysiotherapyspecificmovements
AT blesergabriele validityofinertialsensorbased3djointkinematicsofstaticanddynamicsportandphysiotherapyspecificmovements