Cargando…

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study()

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate implant survival, crestal bone level changes, and clinical parameters of IDcam dental implants over a mean follow-up period of 3 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients, 32 females and 40 males, received 255 implants. Implant-suppo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nemli, Seçil Karakoca, Güngör, Merve Bankoğlu, Aydın, Cemal, Yılmaz, Handan, Bal, Bilge Turhan, Arıcı, Yeliz Kaşko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6395157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2014.11.003
_version_ 1783399034509066240
author Nemli, Seçil Karakoca
Güngör, Merve Bankoğlu
Aydın, Cemal
Yılmaz, Handan
Bal, Bilge Turhan
Arıcı, Yeliz Kaşko
author_facet Nemli, Seçil Karakoca
Güngör, Merve Bankoğlu
Aydın, Cemal
Yılmaz, Handan
Bal, Bilge Turhan
Arıcı, Yeliz Kaşko
author_sort Nemli, Seçil Karakoca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate implant survival, crestal bone level changes, and clinical parameters of IDcam dental implants over a mean follow-up period of 3 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients, 32 females and 40 males, received 255 implants. Implant-supported metal–ceramic fixed restorations were inserted. Following completion of restorations, each patient was re-examined at 6-month intervals. Radiographic crestal bone level changes were calculated, as well as soft tissue parameters including pocket probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, and gingival index. Examination results were recorded from 18 months to 42 months. Implant survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Associations between implant survival and recorded variables were estimated using Cox proportional regression analysis. RESULTS: The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated a cumulative survival rate of 97.6%. Three implants in three patients failed to osseointegrate at stage 2 surgery, and three implants in three patients were lost after loading. The mean marginal bone losses were 0.35 ± 0.14 mm, 0.47 ± 0.15 mm, and 0.58 ± 0.16 mm, as determined 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after prosthetic loading, respectively. Cox proportional regression analysis revealed that the variables such as age, sex, type of the restoration, and implant region had no significant influence on implant failure (P > 0.05). Coefficients of correlation between implant survival and crestal bone loss, pocket probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, and gingival index were found to be nonsignificant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Survival and radiographic and clinical assessments of implants after 2 years of function demonstrated promising results for an IDcam dental implant system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6395157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63951572019-03-20 Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study() Nemli, Seçil Karakoca Güngör, Merve Bankoğlu Aydın, Cemal Yılmaz, Handan Bal, Bilge Turhan Arıcı, Yeliz Kaşko J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate implant survival, crestal bone level changes, and clinical parameters of IDcam dental implants over a mean follow-up period of 3 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients, 32 females and 40 males, received 255 implants. Implant-supported metal–ceramic fixed restorations were inserted. Following completion of restorations, each patient was re-examined at 6-month intervals. Radiographic crestal bone level changes were calculated, as well as soft tissue parameters including pocket probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, and gingival index. Examination results were recorded from 18 months to 42 months. Implant survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Associations between implant survival and recorded variables were estimated using Cox proportional regression analysis. RESULTS: The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated a cumulative survival rate of 97.6%. Three implants in three patients failed to osseointegrate at stage 2 surgery, and three implants in three patients were lost after loading. The mean marginal bone losses were 0.35 ± 0.14 mm, 0.47 ± 0.15 mm, and 0.58 ± 0.16 mm, as determined 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after prosthetic loading, respectively. Cox proportional regression analysis revealed that the variables such as age, sex, type of the restoration, and implant region had no significant influence on implant failure (P > 0.05). Coefficients of correlation between implant survival and crestal bone loss, pocket probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, and gingival index were found to be nonsignificant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Survival and radiographic and clinical assessments of implants after 2 years of function demonstrated promising results for an IDcam dental implant system. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2016-03 2015-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6395157/ /pubmed/30894942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2014.11.003 Text en Copyright © 2015, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nemli, Seçil Karakoca
Güngör, Merve Bankoğlu
Aydın, Cemal
Yılmaz, Handan
Bal, Bilge Turhan
Arıcı, Yeliz Kaşko
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study()
title Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study()
title_full Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study()
title_fullStr Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study()
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study()
title_short Clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: Results of a 3-year prospective study()
title_sort clinical and radiographic evaluation of new dental implant system: results of a 3-year prospective study()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6395157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2014.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT nemlisecilkarakoca clinicalandradiographicevaluationofnewdentalimplantsystemresultsofa3yearprospectivestudy
AT gungormervebankoglu clinicalandradiographicevaluationofnewdentalimplantsystemresultsofa3yearprospectivestudy
AT aydıncemal clinicalandradiographicevaluationofnewdentalimplantsystemresultsofa3yearprospectivestudy
AT yılmazhandan clinicalandradiographicevaluationofnewdentalimplantsystemresultsofa3yearprospectivestudy
AT balbilgeturhan clinicalandradiographicevaluationofnewdentalimplantsystemresultsofa3yearprospectivestudy
AT arıcıyelizkasko clinicalandradiographicevaluationofnewdentalimplantsystemresultsofa3yearprospectivestudy