Cargando…
Bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: A comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: High prevalence of bifid mandibular canals has been visualized with various types of computerized tomography (CT). Along the canals, a various ranged corticalization was recently reported. The depiction of the fine anatomic structures on multislice and cone-beam CT images was com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6395192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.01.002 |
_version_ | 1783399040374800384 |
---|---|
author | Shen, E-Chin Fu, Earl Peng, Michelle Hsieh, Yao-Dung Tu, Hsiao-Pei Fu, Min-Wen |
author_facet | Shen, E-Chin Fu, Earl Peng, Michelle Hsieh, Yao-Dung Tu, Hsiao-Pei Fu, Min-Wen |
author_sort | Shen, E-Chin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: High prevalence of bifid mandibular canals has been visualized with various types of computerized tomography (CT). Along the canals, a various ranged corticalization was recently reported. The depiction of the fine anatomic structures on multislice and cone-beam CT images was compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The presence or absence of the bifid canal was assessed on 327 images obtained by multislice CT (MSCT; n = 173) or by cone-beam CT (CBCT; n = 154), according to the configuration. The cortex thickness and distribution were also assessed. RESULTS: The prevalence of bifid canal detected by CBCT was significantly greater than that detected by MSCT (42.2% vs. 18.7% for hemi-mandibles and 58.4% vs. 30.6% for patients). Cortical thickness recorded by CBCT was significantly thinner than that recorded by MSCT (0.48 mm vs. 0.65 mm, P < 0.001); however, the distributions of corticalization detected by the two tomography methods were similar. There was a significant association of cortex thickness with CT type and corticalization degree (R(2) = 0.530, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thinner cortices, but greater prevalence of bifid canals recorded by CBCT, compared to MSCT, suggests that clinicians should be cautious when using CT to interpret this fine anatomic structure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6395192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63951922019-03-20 Bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: A comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography Shen, E-Chin Fu, Earl Peng, Michelle Hsieh, Yao-Dung Tu, Hsiao-Pei Fu, Min-Wen J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: High prevalence of bifid mandibular canals has been visualized with various types of computerized tomography (CT). Along the canals, a various ranged corticalization was recently reported. The depiction of the fine anatomic structures on multislice and cone-beam CT images was compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The presence or absence of the bifid canal was assessed on 327 images obtained by multislice CT (MSCT; n = 173) or by cone-beam CT (CBCT; n = 154), according to the configuration. The cortex thickness and distribution were also assessed. RESULTS: The prevalence of bifid canal detected by CBCT was significantly greater than that detected by MSCT (42.2% vs. 18.7% for hemi-mandibles and 58.4% vs. 30.6% for patients). Cortical thickness recorded by CBCT was significantly thinner than that recorded by MSCT (0.48 mm vs. 0.65 mm, P < 0.001); however, the distributions of corticalization detected by the two tomography methods were similar. There was a significant association of cortex thickness with CT type and corticalization degree (R(2) = 0.530, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thinner cortices, but greater prevalence of bifid canals recorded by CBCT, compared to MSCT, suggests that clinicians should be cautious when using CT to interpret this fine anatomic structure. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2016-06 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6395192/ /pubmed/30894967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.01.002 Text en Copyright © 2016, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shen, E-Chin Fu, Earl Peng, Michelle Hsieh, Yao-Dung Tu, Hsiao-Pei Fu, Min-Wen Bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: A comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography |
title | Bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: A comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography |
title_full | Bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: A comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: A comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: A comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography |
title_short | Bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: A comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography |
title_sort | bifid mandibular canals and their cortex thicknesses: a comparison study on images obtained from cone-beam and multislice computed tomography |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6395192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.01.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenechin bifidmandibularcanalsandtheircortexthicknessesacomparisonstudyonimagesobtainedfromconebeamandmultislicecomputedtomography AT fuearl bifidmandibularcanalsandtheircortexthicknessesacomparisonstudyonimagesobtainedfromconebeamandmultislicecomputedtomography AT pengmichelle bifidmandibularcanalsandtheircortexthicknessesacomparisonstudyonimagesobtainedfromconebeamandmultislicecomputedtomography AT hsiehyaodung bifidmandibularcanalsandtheircortexthicknessesacomparisonstudyonimagesobtainedfromconebeamandmultislicecomputedtomography AT tuhsiaopei bifidmandibularcanalsandtheircortexthicknessesacomparisonstudyonimagesobtainedfromconebeamandmultislicecomputedtomography AT fuminwen bifidmandibularcanalsandtheircortexthicknessesacomparisonstudyonimagesobtainedfromconebeamandmultislicecomputedtomography |