Cargando…

Isolation and characterization of human gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells using limiting dilution method

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) are attractive alternative MSC sources because of their relative abundance of sources and ease of accessibility. However, the isolation method for harboring GMSCs remains under discussion. The aim of the study was to isolate and expl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Lingqian, Yang, Pishan, Ge, Shaohua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6395297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.03.010
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) are attractive alternative MSC sources because of their relative abundance of sources and ease of accessibility. However, the isolation method for harboring GMSCs remains under discussion. The aim of the study was to isolate and explore in vitro characterization of human GMSCs, and compare stem cell properties with bulk-cultured gingival fibroblasts (GFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: GMSCs were isolated with limiting dilution method. Tissue-matched bulk-cultured GFs and GMSCs were evaluated in terms of their colony-forming abilities, population doubling capacities, cell surface epitopes, and multilineage differentiation potentials. RESULTS: GMSCs showed a significantly higher number of colony-forming units-fibroblast (P < 0.001) than bulk-cultured GFs, while the population doubling capacity of GMSCs reduced. Both types of cells were uniformly positive for MSC-associated makers CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD166, and were negative for hematopoietic markers CD14, CD34, and CD45. The only distinct marker was STRO-1, which was more highly expressed in GMSCs (13.4%) than in bulk-cultured GFs (0.02%). Upon induction, GMSCs displayed the capacity to undergo osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation. Real-time polymerase chain reaction showed related gene levels were significantly upregulated (P < 0.001). By contrast, bulk-cultured GFs lacked the capacity to undergo multilineage differentiation, and related gene levels showed no significant difference when compared with control groups. CONCLUSION: The data validate the effectiveness of limiting dilution method for GMSCs isolation. GMSCs, in contrast to bulk-cultured GFs, harbor stem cell characteristics and can act as alternative cell sources for tissue engineering.