Cargando…

Comparative analysis of differentially secreted proteins in serum-free and serum-containing media by using BONCAT and pulsed SILAC

Despite the increased interest in secretomes associated with paracrine/autocrine mechanisms, the majority of mass spectrometric cell secretome studies have been performed using serum-free medium (SFM). On the other hand, serum-containing medium (SCM) is not recommended very much because the secretom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Jihye, Rhim, Jiheon, Kwon, Yumi, Choi, Sun Young, Shin, Sungho, Ha, Chul-Won, Lee, Cheolju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6395664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30816242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39650-z
_version_ 1783399120925360128
author Shin, Jihye
Rhim, Jiheon
Kwon, Yumi
Choi, Sun Young
Shin, Sungho
Ha, Chul-Won
Lee, Cheolju
author_facet Shin, Jihye
Rhim, Jiheon
Kwon, Yumi
Choi, Sun Young
Shin, Sungho
Ha, Chul-Won
Lee, Cheolju
author_sort Shin, Jihye
collection PubMed
description Despite the increased interest in secretomes associated with paracrine/autocrine mechanisms, the majority of mass spectrometric cell secretome studies have been performed using serum-free medium (SFM). On the other hand, serum-containing medium (SCM) is not recommended very much because the secretome obtained with SCM is easily contaminated with fetal bovine serum (FBS) proteins. In this study, through the combination of bioorthogonal non-canonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT) and pulsed-SILAC (pSILAC), we analyzed differentially secreted proteins between SFM and SCM in a cancer-derived human cell, U87MG, and a mesenchymal stem cell derived from human Wharton’s jelly (hWJ-MSCs). In most cases, the bioinformatic tools predicted a protein to be truly secretory when the secretion level of the protein was more in SCM than in SFM. In the case of hWJ-MSCs, the amount of proteins secreted in SCM for 24 hours was larger than that of SFM (log(2) fold change = 0.96), even considering different cell proliferation rates. hWJ-MSCs proteins secreted more in SCM included several positive markers of MSC paracrine factors implicated in angiogenesis, neurogenesis and osteogenesis, and upstream regulators of cell proliferation. Our study suggests the analysis of the secretome should be processed in SCM that promotes cell proliferation and secretion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6395664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63956642019-03-04 Comparative analysis of differentially secreted proteins in serum-free and serum-containing media by using BONCAT and pulsed SILAC Shin, Jihye Rhim, Jiheon Kwon, Yumi Choi, Sun Young Shin, Sungho Ha, Chul-Won Lee, Cheolju Sci Rep Article Despite the increased interest in secretomes associated with paracrine/autocrine mechanisms, the majority of mass spectrometric cell secretome studies have been performed using serum-free medium (SFM). On the other hand, serum-containing medium (SCM) is not recommended very much because the secretome obtained with SCM is easily contaminated with fetal bovine serum (FBS) proteins. In this study, through the combination of bioorthogonal non-canonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT) and pulsed-SILAC (pSILAC), we analyzed differentially secreted proteins between SFM and SCM in a cancer-derived human cell, U87MG, and a mesenchymal stem cell derived from human Wharton’s jelly (hWJ-MSCs). In most cases, the bioinformatic tools predicted a protein to be truly secretory when the secretion level of the protein was more in SCM than in SFM. In the case of hWJ-MSCs, the amount of proteins secreted in SCM for 24 hours was larger than that of SFM (log(2) fold change = 0.96), even considering different cell proliferation rates. hWJ-MSCs proteins secreted more in SCM included several positive markers of MSC paracrine factors implicated in angiogenesis, neurogenesis and osteogenesis, and upstream regulators of cell proliferation. Our study suggests the analysis of the secretome should be processed in SCM that promotes cell proliferation and secretion. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6395664/ /pubmed/30816242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39650-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Shin, Jihye
Rhim, Jiheon
Kwon, Yumi
Choi, Sun Young
Shin, Sungho
Ha, Chul-Won
Lee, Cheolju
Comparative analysis of differentially secreted proteins in serum-free and serum-containing media by using BONCAT and pulsed SILAC
title Comparative analysis of differentially secreted proteins in serum-free and serum-containing media by using BONCAT and pulsed SILAC
title_full Comparative analysis of differentially secreted proteins in serum-free and serum-containing media by using BONCAT and pulsed SILAC
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of differentially secreted proteins in serum-free and serum-containing media by using BONCAT and pulsed SILAC
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of differentially secreted proteins in serum-free and serum-containing media by using BONCAT and pulsed SILAC
title_short Comparative analysis of differentially secreted proteins in serum-free and serum-containing media by using BONCAT and pulsed SILAC
title_sort comparative analysis of differentially secreted proteins in serum-free and serum-containing media by using boncat and pulsed silac
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6395664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30816242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39650-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjihye comparativeanalysisofdifferentiallysecretedproteinsinserumfreeandserumcontainingmediabyusingboncatandpulsedsilac
AT rhimjiheon comparativeanalysisofdifferentiallysecretedproteinsinserumfreeandserumcontainingmediabyusingboncatandpulsedsilac
AT kwonyumi comparativeanalysisofdifferentiallysecretedproteinsinserumfreeandserumcontainingmediabyusingboncatandpulsedsilac
AT choisunyoung comparativeanalysisofdifferentiallysecretedproteinsinserumfreeandserumcontainingmediabyusingboncatandpulsedsilac
AT shinsungho comparativeanalysisofdifferentiallysecretedproteinsinserumfreeandserumcontainingmediabyusingboncatandpulsedsilac
AT hachulwon comparativeanalysisofdifferentiallysecretedproteinsinserumfreeandserumcontainingmediabyusingboncatandpulsedsilac
AT leecheolju comparativeanalysisofdifferentiallysecretedproteinsinserumfreeandserumcontainingmediabyusingboncatandpulsedsilac