Cargando…

Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs

Twelve adult beagle dogs (10.6 ± 1.4 kg) were fed extruded dog diets in which the starch sources were whole sorghum, sorghum flour, sorghum mill-feed, or an equal combination of rice, corn, and wheat. The experiment was conducted as a replicated Latin square design digestibility study. Estimates of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alvarenga, Isabella Corsato, Aldrich, Charles G, Ou, Zhining
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30753619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz020
_version_ 1783399226033569792
author Alvarenga, Isabella Corsato
Aldrich, Charles G
Ou, Zhining
author_facet Alvarenga, Isabella Corsato
Aldrich, Charles G
Ou, Zhining
author_sort Alvarenga, Isabella Corsato
collection PubMed
description Twelve adult beagle dogs (10.6 ± 1.4 kg) were fed extruded dog diets in which the starch sources were whole sorghum, sorghum flour, sorghum mill-feed, or an equal combination of rice, corn, and wheat. The experiment was conducted as a replicated Latin square design digestibility study. Estimates of fecal organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), crude fat (CF), and gross energy (GE) outputs were determined by four methods: total fecal collection (TFC), chromic oxide (Cr(2)O(3)), titanium dioxide (TiO(2)), and acid insoluble ash (AIA). The correlation among the fecal output estimates by the four methods by partial correlation coefficients from the Error SSCP Matrix (Pearson) were considered significant at P < 0.05. The external markers, Cr(2)O(3) and TiO(2), had a higher (P < 0.05) OM fecal output Pearson correlation to TFC than the intrinsic marker AIA (R = 0.931 for Cr(2)O(3) vs. TiO(2); R = 0.559 for TFC vs. Cr(2)O(3); R = 0.592 for TFC vs. TiO(2); R = 0.291 for AIA vs. TFC). Interestingly, TiO(2) highly correlated (P < 0.05) to Cr(2)O(3) (R = 0.93 for OM), and was also correlated highly to TFC and AIA. The study suggests that TiO(2) may be a preferred marker to estimate fecal output in dogs vs. Cr(2)O(3). The use of AIA represents a potential option for determining digestibility for diets in which external markers are impractical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6396234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63962342019-03-05 Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs Alvarenga, Isabella Corsato Aldrich, Charles G Ou, Zhining J Anim Sci Featured Collection Twelve adult beagle dogs (10.6 ± 1.4 kg) were fed extruded dog diets in which the starch sources were whole sorghum, sorghum flour, sorghum mill-feed, or an equal combination of rice, corn, and wheat. The experiment was conducted as a replicated Latin square design digestibility study. Estimates of fecal organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), crude fat (CF), and gross energy (GE) outputs were determined by four methods: total fecal collection (TFC), chromic oxide (Cr(2)O(3)), titanium dioxide (TiO(2)), and acid insoluble ash (AIA). The correlation among the fecal output estimates by the four methods by partial correlation coefficients from the Error SSCP Matrix (Pearson) were considered significant at P < 0.05. The external markers, Cr(2)O(3) and TiO(2), had a higher (P < 0.05) OM fecal output Pearson correlation to TFC than the intrinsic marker AIA (R = 0.931 for Cr(2)O(3) vs. TiO(2); R = 0.559 for TFC vs. Cr(2)O(3); R = 0.592 for TFC vs. TiO(2); R = 0.291 for AIA vs. TFC). Interestingly, TiO(2) highly correlated (P < 0.05) to Cr(2)O(3) (R = 0.93 for OM), and was also correlated highly to TFC and AIA. The study suggests that TiO(2) may be a preferred marker to estimate fecal output in dogs vs. Cr(2)O(3). The use of AIA represents a potential option for determining digestibility for diets in which external markers are impractical. Oxford University Press 2019-03 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6396234/ /pubmed/30753619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz020 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Featured Collection
Alvarenga, Isabella Corsato
Aldrich, Charles G
Ou, Zhining
Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs
title Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs
title_full Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs
title_fullStr Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs
title_short Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs
title_sort comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs
topic Featured Collection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30753619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz020
work_keys_str_mv AT alvarengaisabellacorsato comparisonoffourdigestibilitymarkerstoestimatefecaloutputofdogs
AT aldrichcharlesg comparisonoffourdigestibilitymarkerstoestimatefecaloutputofdogs
AT ouzhining comparisonoffourdigestibilitymarkerstoestimatefecaloutputofdogs