Cargando…

Implications of Classification of Os Trigonum: A Study Based on Computed Tomography Three-Dimensional Imaging

BACKGROUND: The os trigonum is an accessory bone that is not fully fused with the talus during secondary ossification, and is one of the risk factors of posterior malleolus impact syndrome. The purpose of this study was to classify the os trigonum and to guide the diagnosis and treatment of related...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Xiaoyong, Ma, Li, Zeng, Yan, He, Qizhou, Yu, Fei, Ren, Lin, Luo, Bei, Fu, Shijie, Zhang, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794531
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.914485
_version_ 1783399251072516096
author Fu, Xiaoyong
Ma, Li
Zeng, Yan
He, Qizhou
Yu, Fei
Ren, Lin
Luo, Bei
Fu, Shijie
Zhang, Lei
author_facet Fu, Xiaoyong
Ma, Li
Zeng, Yan
He, Qizhou
Yu, Fei
Ren, Lin
Luo, Bei
Fu, Shijie
Zhang, Lei
author_sort Fu, Xiaoyong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The os trigonum is an accessory bone that is not fully fused with the talus during secondary ossification, and is one of the risk factors of posterior malleolus impact syndrome. The purpose of this study was to classify the os trigonum and to guide the diagnosis and treatment of related clinical diseases. MATERIAL/METHODS: Ankle computed tomography (CT) scans of 586 Chinese patients between October 2014 and October 2018 were reviewed. CT images of 1011 ankle joints were reconstructed to evaluate the classification of the os trigonum and the measurement of anatomical parameters. RESULTS: The incidences of os trigonum in 3 groups were determined as type I (1.9%), type II (10.5%), and type III (14.7%). The macro-axis of type II (0.89±0.31) cm was significantly larger than with type I (0.65±0.24 cm) and type III (0.74±0.23 cm) (p<0.05).The minor axis of similar of type I (0.41±0.23 cm) was significantly shorter than that of type II (0.58±0.32 cm) and type III (0.55±0.16 cm) (p<0.05).The distance from os trigonum to calcaneal tubercle was significantly different than that of type I (1.33±0.52 cm), type II (1.67±0.55 cm), and type III (1.84±0.45 cm) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that os trigonum has a high incidence. Type I was the least common, the volume of type II was larger, and type III was more common. The anatomical parameters of each type may improve treatment of related diseases and the further development of ankle arthroscopic surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6396439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63964392019-03-26 Implications of Classification of Os Trigonum: A Study Based on Computed Tomography Three-Dimensional Imaging Fu, Xiaoyong Ma, Li Zeng, Yan He, Qizhou Yu, Fei Ren, Lin Luo, Bei Fu, Shijie Zhang, Lei Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The os trigonum is an accessory bone that is not fully fused with the talus during secondary ossification, and is one of the risk factors of posterior malleolus impact syndrome. The purpose of this study was to classify the os trigonum and to guide the diagnosis and treatment of related clinical diseases. MATERIAL/METHODS: Ankle computed tomography (CT) scans of 586 Chinese patients between October 2014 and October 2018 were reviewed. CT images of 1011 ankle joints were reconstructed to evaluate the classification of the os trigonum and the measurement of anatomical parameters. RESULTS: The incidences of os trigonum in 3 groups were determined as type I (1.9%), type II (10.5%), and type III (14.7%). The macro-axis of type II (0.89±0.31) cm was significantly larger than with type I (0.65±0.24 cm) and type III (0.74±0.23 cm) (p<0.05).The minor axis of similar of type I (0.41±0.23 cm) was significantly shorter than that of type II (0.58±0.32 cm) and type III (0.55±0.16 cm) (p<0.05).The distance from os trigonum to calcaneal tubercle was significantly different than that of type I (1.33±0.52 cm), type II (1.67±0.55 cm), and type III (1.84±0.45 cm) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that os trigonum has a high incidence. Type I was the least common, the volume of type II was larger, and type III was more common. The anatomical parameters of each type may improve treatment of related diseases and the further development of ankle arthroscopic surgery. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6396439/ /pubmed/30794531 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.914485 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2019 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Fu, Xiaoyong
Ma, Li
Zeng, Yan
He, Qizhou
Yu, Fei
Ren, Lin
Luo, Bei
Fu, Shijie
Zhang, Lei
Implications of Classification of Os Trigonum: A Study Based on Computed Tomography Three-Dimensional Imaging
title Implications of Classification of Os Trigonum: A Study Based on Computed Tomography Three-Dimensional Imaging
title_full Implications of Classification of Os Trigonum: A Study Based on Computed Tomography Three-Dimensional Imaging
title_fullStr Implications of Classification of Os Trigonum: A Study Based on Computed Tomography Three-Dimensional Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Classification of Os Trigonum: A Study Based on Computed Tomography Three-Dimensional Imaging
title_short Implications of Classification of Os Trigonum: A Study Based on Computed Tomography Three-Dimensional Imaging
title_sort implications of classification of os trigonum: a study based on computed tomography three-dimensional imaging
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794531
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.914485
work_keys_str_mv AT fuxiaoyong implicationsofclassificationofostrigonumastudybasedoncomputedtomographythreedimensionalimaging
AT mali implicationsofclassificationofostrigonumastudybasedoncomputedtomographythreedimensionalimaging
AT zengyan implicationsofclassificationofostrigonumastudybasedoncomputedtomographythreedimensionalimaging
AT heqizhou implicationsofclassificationofostrigonumastudybasedoncomputedtomographythreedimensionalimaging
AT yufei implicationsofclassificationofostrigonumastudybasedoncomputedtomographythreedimensionalimaging
AT renlin implicationsofclassificationofostrigonumastudybasedoncomputedtomographythreedimensionalimaging
AT luobei implicationsofclassificationofostrigonumastudybasedoncomputedtomographythreedimensionalimaging
AT fushijie implicationsofclassificationofostrigonumastudybasedoncomputedtomographythreedimensionalimaging
AT zhanglei implicationsofclassificationofostrigonumastudybasedoncomputedtomographythreedimensionalimaging