Cargando…

Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: This systematic review examined the methodological quality of studies and assessed the psychometric qualities of interview-administered Past-week and Usual-week Physical Activity Questionnaires (PAQs). Pubmed and Embase were used to retrieve data sources. METHODS: The studies were select...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doma, Kenji, Speyer, Renée, Parsons, Lauren Alese, Cordier, Reinie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30823873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0684-1
_version_ 1783399257549570048
author Doma, Kenji
Speyer, Renée
Parsons, Lauren Alese
Cordier, Reinie
author_facet Doma, Kenji
Speyer, Renée
Parsons, Lauren Alese
Cordier, Reinie
author_sort Doma, Kenji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This systematic review examined the methodological quality of studies and assessed the psychometric qualities of interview-administered Past-week and Usual-week Physical Activity Questionnaires (PAQs). Pubmed and Embase were used to retrieve data sources. METHODS: The studies were selected using the following eligibility criteria: 1) psychometric properties of PAQs were assessed in adults; 2) the PAQs either consisted of recall periods of usual 7-days (Usual-week PAQs) within the past 12 months or during the past 7-days (Past-week PAQs); and 3) PAQs were interview-administered. The COSMIN taxonomy was utilised to critically appraise study quality and a previously established psychometric criteria employed to evaluate the overall psychometric qualities. RESULTS: Following screening, 42 studies were examined to determine the psychometric properties of 20 PAQs, with the majority of studies demonstrating good to excellent ratings for methodological quality. For convergent validity (i.e., the relationship between PAQs and other measures), similar overall associations were found between Past-week PAQs and Usual-week PAQs. However, PAQs were more strongly associated with direct measures of physical activity (e.g., accelerometer) than indirect measures of physical activity (i.e., physical fitness), irrespective of recall methods. Very few psychometric properties were examined for each PAQ, with the majority exhibiting poor ratings in psychometric quality. Only a few interview-administered PAQs exhibited positive ratings for a single psychometric property, although the other properties were either rated as poor or questionable, demonstrating the limitations of current PAQs. CONCLUSION: Accordingly, further research is necessary to explore a greater number of psychometric properties, or to develop new PAQs by addressing the psychometric limitations identified in the current review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6396466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63964662019-03-13 Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review Doma, Kenji Speyer, Renée Parsons, Lauren Alese Cordier, Reinie BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: This systematic review examined the methodological quality of studies and assessed the psychometric qualities of interview-administered Past-week and Usual-week Physical Activity Questionnaires (PAQs). Pubmed and Embase were used to retrieve data sources. METHODS: The studies were selected using the following eligibility criteria: 1) psychometric properties of PAQs were assessed in adults; 2) the PAQs either consisted of recall periods of usual 7-days (Usual-week PAQs) within the past 12 months or during the past 7-days (Past-week PAQs); and 3) PAQs were interview-administered. The COSMIN taxonomy was utilised to critically appraise study quality and a previously established psychometric criteria employed to evaluate the overall psychometric qualities. RESULTS: Following screening, 42 studies were examined to determine the psychometric properties of 20 PAQs, with the majority of studies demonstrating good to excellent ratings for methodological quality. For convergent validity (i.e., the relationship between PAQs and other measures), similar overall associations were found between Past-week PAQs and Usual-week PAQs. However, PAQs were more strongly associated with direct measures of physical activity (e.g., accelerometer) than indirect measures of physical activity (i.e., physical fitness), irrespective of recall methods. Very few psychometric properties were examined for each PAQ, with the majority exhibiting poor ratings in psychometric quality. Only a few interview-administered PAQs exhibited positive ratings for a single psychometric property, although the other properties were either rated as poor or questionable, demonstrating the limitations of current PAQs. CONCLUSION: Accordingly, further research is necessary to explore a greater number of psychometric properties, or to develop new PAQs by addressing the psychometric limitations identified in the current review. BioMed Central 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6396466/ /pubmed/30823873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0684-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Doma, Kenji
Speyer, Renée
Parsons, Lauren Alese
Cordier, Reinie
Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
title Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
title_full Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
title_fullStr Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
title_short Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
title_sort comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30823873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0684-1
work_keys_str_mv AT domakenji comparisonofpsychometricpropertiesbetweenrecallmethodsofinterviewbasedphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT speyerrenee comparisonofpsychometricpropertiesbetweenrecallmethodsofinterviewbasedphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT parsonslaurenalese comparisonofpsychometricpropertiesbetweenrecallmethodsofinterviewbasedphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview
AT cordierreinie comparisonofpsychometricpropertiesbetweenrecallmethodsofinterviewbasedphysicalactivityquestionnairesasystematicreview