Cargando…
Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs
BACKGROUND: In pigs, crossbreeding aims at exploiting heterosis, but heterosis is difficult to quantify. Heterozygosity at genetic markers is easier to measure and could potentially be used as an indicator of heterosis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of heterozygosity on v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1 |
_version_ | 1783399265960198144 |
---|---|
author | Iversen, Maja Winther Nordbø, Øyvind Gjerlaug-Enger, Eli Grindflek, Eli Lopes, Marcos Soares Meuwissen, Theo |
author_facet | Iversen, Maja Winther Nordbø, Øyvind Gjerlaug-Enger, Eli Grindflek, Eli Lopes, Marcos Soares Meuwissen, Theo |
author_sort | Iversen, Maja Winther |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In pigs, crossbreeding aims at exploiting heterosis, but heterosis is difficult to quantify. Heterozygosity at genetic markers is easier to measure and could potentially be used as an indicator of heterosis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of heterozygosity on various maternal and production traits in purebred and crossbred pigs. The proportion of heterozygosity at genetic markers across the genome for each individual was included in the prediction model as a fixed regression across or within breeds. RESULTS: Estimates of regression coefficients of heterozygosity showed large effects for some traits. For maternal traits, regression coefficient estimates were always in a favourable direction, while for production, meat and slaughter quality traits, they were both favourable and unfavourable. Traits with the largest estimated effects of heterozygosity were total number born, litter weight at 3 weeks, weight at 150 days, and age at 40 kg. Estimates of regression coefficients on heterozygosity differed between breeds. Traits with the largest effect of heterozygosity also showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in prediction accuracy when heterozygosity was included in the model compared to the model without heterozygosity. CONCLUSIONS: For traits with the largest estimates of regression coefficients on heterozygosity, the inclusion of heterozygosity in the model improved prediction accuracy. Using models that include heterozygosity would result in selecting different animals for breeding, which has the potential to improve genetic gain for these traits. This is most beneficial when crossbreds or several breeds are included in the estimation of breeding values and is relevant to all species, not only pigs. Thus, our results show that including heterozygosity in the model is beneficial for some traits, likely due to dominant gene action. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6396501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63965012019-03-13 Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs Iversen, Maja Winther Nordbø, Øyvind Gjerlaug-Enger, Eli Grindflek, Eli Lopes, Marcos Soares Meuwissen, Theo Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: In pigs, crossbreeding aims at exploiting heterosis, but heterosis is difficult to quantify. Heterozygosity at genetic markers is easier to measure and could potentially be used as an indicator of heterosis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of heterozygosity on various maternal and production traits in purebred and crossbred pigs. The proportion of heterozygosity at genetic markers across the genome for each individual was included in the prediction model as a fixed regression across or within breeds. RESULTS: Estimates of regression coefficients of heterozygosity showed large effects for some traits. For maternal traits, regression coefficient estimates were always in a favourable direction, while for production, meat and slaughter quality traits, they were both favourable and unfavourable. Traits with the largest estimated effects of heterozygosity were total number born, litter weight at 3 weeks, weight at 150 days, and age at 40 kg. Estimates of regression coefficients on heterozygosity differed between breeds. Traits with the largest effect of heterozygosity also showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in prediction accuracy when heterozygosity was included in the model compared to the model without heterozygosity. CONCLUSIONS: For traits with the largest estimates of regression coefficients on heterozygosity, the inclusion of heterozygosity in the model improved prediction accuracy. Using models that include heterozygosity would result in selecting different animals for breeding, which has the potential to improve genetic gain for these traits. This is most beneficial when crossbreds or several breeds are included in the estimation of breeding values and is relevant to all species, not only pigs. Thus, our results show that including heterozygosity in the model is beneficial for some traits, likely due to dominant gene action. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6396501/ /pubmed/30819106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Iversen, Maja Winther Nordbø, Øyvind Gjerlaug-Enger, Eli Grindflek, Eli Lopes, Marcos Soares Meuwissen, Theo Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs |
title | Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs |
title_full | Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs |
title_fullStr | Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs |
title_short | Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs |
title_sort | effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iversenmajawinther effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs AT nordbøøyvind effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs AT gjerlaugengereli effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs AT grindflekeli effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs AT lopesmarcossoares effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs AT meuwissentheo effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs |