Cargando…

Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs

BACKGROUND: In pigs, crossbreeding aims at exploiting heterosis, but heterosis is difficult to quantify. Heterozygosity at genetic markers is easier to measure and could potentially be used as an indicator of heterosis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of heterozygosity on v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iversen, Maja Winther, Nordbø, Øyvind, Gjerlaug-Enger, Eli, Grindflek, Eli, Lopes, Marcos Soares, Meuwissen, Theo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1
_version_ 1783399265960198144
author Iversen, Maja Winther
Nordbø, Øyvind
Gjerlaug-Enger, Eli
Grindflek, Eli
Lopes, Marcos Soares
Meuwissen, Theo
author_facet Iversen, Maja Winther
Nordbø, Øyvind
Gjerlaug-Enger, Eli
Grindflek, Eli
Lopes, Marcos Soares
Meuwissen, Theo
author_sort Iversen, Maja Winther
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In pigs, crossbreeding aims at exploiting heterosis, but heterosis is difficult to quantify. Heterozygosity at genetic markers is easier to measure and could potentially be used as an indicator of heterosis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of heterozygosity on various maternal and production traits in purebred and crossbred pigs. The proportion of heterozygosity at genetic markers across the genome for each individual was included in the prediction model as a fixed regression across or within breeds. RESULTS: Estimates of regression coefficients of heterozygosity showed large effects for some traits. For maternal traits, regression coefficient estimates were always in a favourable direction, while for production, meat and slaughter quality traits, they were both favourable and unfavourable. Traits with the largest estimated effects of heterozygosity were total number born, litter weight at 3 weeks, weight at 150 days, and age at 40 kg. Estimates of regression coefficients on heterozygosity differed between breeds. Traits with the largest effect of heterozygosity also showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in prediction accuracy when heterozygosity was included in the model compared to the model without heterozygosity. CONCLUSIONS: For traits with the largest estimates of regression coefficients on heterozygosity, the inclusion of heterozygosity in the model improved prediction accuracy. Using models that include heterozygosity would result in selecting different animals for breeding, which has the potential to improve genetic gain for these traits. This is most beneficial when crossbreds or several breeds are included in the estimation of breeding values and is relevant to all species, not only pigs. Thus, our results show that including heterozygosity in the model is beneficial for some traits, likely due to dominant gene action. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6396501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63965012019-03-13 Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs Iversen, Maja Winther Nordbø, Øyvind Gjerlaug-Enger, Eli Grindflek, Eli Lopes, Marcos Soares Meuwissen, Theo Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: In pigs, crossbreeding aims at exploiting heterosis, but heterosis is difficult to quantify. Heterozygosity at genetic markers is easier to measure and could potentially be used as an indicator of heterosis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of heterozygosity on various maternal and production traits in purebred and crossbred pigs. The proportion of heterozygosity at genetic markers across the genome for each individual was included in the prediction model as a fixed regression across or within breeds. RESULTS: Estimates of regression coefficients of heterozygosity showed large effects for some traits. For maternal traits, regression coefficient estimates were always in a favourable direction, while for production, meat and slaughter quality traits, they were both favourable and unfavourable. Traits with the largest estimated effects of heterozygosity were total number born, litter weight at 3 weeks, weight at 150 days, and age at 40 kg. Estimates of regression coefficients on heterozygosity differed between breeds. Traits with the largest effect of heterozygosity also showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in prediction accuracy when heterozygosity was included in the model compared to the model without heterozygosity. CONCLUSIONS: For traits with the largest estimates of regression coefficients on heterozygosity, the inclusion of heterozygosity in the model improved prediction accuracy. Using models that include heterozygosity would result in selecting different animals for breeding, which has the potential to improve genetic gain for these traits. This is most beneficial when crossbreds or several breeds are included in the estimation of breeding values and is relevant to all species, not only pigs. Thus, our results show that including heterozygosity in the model is beneficial for some traits, likely due to dominant gene action. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6396501/ /pubmed/30819106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iversen, Maja Winther
Nordbø, Øyvind
Gjerlaug-Enger, Eli
Grindflek, Eli
Lopes, Marcos Soares
Meuwissen, Theo
Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs
title Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs
title_full Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs
title_fullStr Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs
title_full_unstemmed Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs
title_short Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs
title_sort effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0450-1
work_keys_str_mv AT iversenmajawinther effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs
AT nordbøøyvind effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs
AT gjerlaugengereli effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs
AT grindflekeli effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs
AT lopesmarcossoares effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs
AT meuwissentheo effectsofheterozygosityonperformanceofpurebredandcrossbredpigs