Cargando…
Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was (1) to give an overview of the available short screening instruments for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and (2) to review the psychometric properties of these instruments. METHODS: First, a systematic search of titles and abstr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3 |
_version_ | 1783399272040890368 |
---|---|
author | De Roeck, Ellen Elisa De Deyn, Peter Paul Dierckx, Eva Engelborghs, Sebastiaan |
author_facet | De Roeck, Ellen Elisa De Deyn, Peter Paul Dierckx, Eva Engelborghs, Sebastiaan |
author_sort | De Roeck, Ellen Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was (1) to give an overview of the available short screening instruments for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and (2) to review the psychometric properties of these instruments. METHODS: First, a systematic search of titles and abstracts of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted between February and July 2015 and updated in April 2016 and May 2018. Only papers written in English or Dutch were considered. All full-text papers about cognitive screening instruments for the early detection of AD were included, resulting in the identification of 38 pencil and paper tests and 12 computer tests. In a second step, the psychometric quality of these instruments was evaluated. Therefore, the same databases were searched again to identify papers that described the psychometric properties of the instruments meanwhile applying diagnostic criteria for the diagnostic groups included. RESULTS: Out of 1454 papers, 96 clearly discussed the psychometric properties of the instruments. Eighty-nine papers discussed pencil and paper tests of which 80 were validated in a memory clinic setting. Based on the number of studies (31 articles) and the sensitivity (84%) and specificity (74%) values, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) seems to be a promising (pencil and paper) screening test for memory clinic testing as well as for population screening. Regarding computer tests, validation studies were only available for 7 out of 12 tests. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of screening tests for AD are available. However, most tests are only validated in a memory clinic setting and description of the psychometric properties of the instruments is limited. Especially, computer tests require further research. The MoCA is a promising instrument, but the specificity to detect early AD is rather low. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6396539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63965392019-03-13 Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review De Roeck, Ellen Elisa De Deyn, Peter Paul Dierckx, Eva Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Alzheimers Res Ther Review OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was (1) to give an overview of the available short screening instruments for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and (2) to review the psychometric properties of these instruments. METHODS: First, a systematic search of titles and abstracts of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted between February and July 2015 and updated in April 2016 and May 2018. Only papers written in English or Dutch were considered. All full-text papers about cognitive screening instruments for the early detection of AD were included, resulting in the identification of 38 pencil and paper tests and 12 computer tests. In a second step, the psychometric quality of these instruments was evaluated. Therefore, the same databases were searched again to identify papers that described the psychometric properties of the instruments meanwhile applying diagnostic criteria for the diagnostic groups included. RESULTS: Out of 1454 papers, 96 clearly discussed the psychometric properties of the instruments. Eighty-nine papers discussed pencil and paper tests of which 80 were validated in a memory clinic setting. Based on the number of studies (31 articles) and the sensitivity (84%) and specificity (74%) values, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) seems to be a promising (pencil and paper) screening test for memory clinic testing as well as for population screening. Regarding computer tests, validation studies were only available for 7 out of 12 tests. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of screening tests for AD are available. However, most tests are only validated in a memory clinic setting and description of the psychometric properties of the instruments is limited. Especially, computer tests require further research. The MoCA is a promising instrument, but the specificity to detect early AD is rather low. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6396539/ /pubmed/30819244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review De Roeck, Ellen Elisa De Deyn, Peter Paul Dierckx, Eva Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review |
title | Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review |
title_full | Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review |
title_short | Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review |
title_sort | brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deroeckellenelisa briefcognitivescreeninginstrumentsforearlydetectionofalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview AT dedeynpeterpaul briefcognitivescreeninginstrumentsforearlydetectionofalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview AT dierckxeva briefcognitivescreeninginstrumentsforearlydetectionofalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview AT engelborghssebastiaan briefcognitivescreeninginstrumentsforearlydetectionofalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview |