Cargando…

Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was (1) to give an overview of the available short screening instruments for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and (2) to review the psychometric properties of these instruments. METHODS: First, a systematic search of titles and abstr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Roeck, Ellen Elisa, De Deyn, Peter Paul, Dierckx, Eva, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3
_version_ 1783399272040890368
author De Roeck, Ellen Elisa
De Deyn, Peter Paul
Dierckx, Eva
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
author_facet De Roeck, Ellen Elisa
De Deyn, Peter Paul
Dierckx, Eva
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
author_sort De Roeck, Ellen Elisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was (1) to give an overview of the available short screening instruments for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and (2) to review the psychometric properties of these instruments. METHODS: First, a systematic search of titles and abstracts of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted between February and July 2015 and updated in April 2016 and May 2018. Only papers written in English or Dutch were considered. All full-text papers about cognitive screening instruments for the early detection of AD were included, resulting in the identification of 38 pencil and paper tests and 12 computer tests. In a second step, the psychometric quality of these instruments was evaluated. Therefore, the same databases were searched again to identify papers that described the psychometric properties of the instruments meanwhile applying diagnostic criteria for the diagnostic groups included. RESULTS: Out of 1454 papers, 96 clearly discussed the psychometric properties of the instruments. Eighty-nine papers discussed pencil and paper tests of which 80 were validated in a memory clinic setting. Based on the number of studies (31 articles) and the sensitivity (84%) and specificity (74%) values, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) seems to be a promising (pencil and paper) screening test for memory clinic testing as well as for population screening. Regarding computer tests, validation studies were only available for 7 out of 12 tests. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of screening tests for AD are available. However, most tests are only validated in a memory clinic setting and description of the psychometric properties of the instruments is limited. Especially, computer tests require further research. The MoCA is a promising instrument, but the specificity to detect early AD is rather low. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6396539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63965392019-03-13 Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review De Roeck, Ellen Elisa De Deyn, Peter Paul Dierckx, Eva Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Alzheimers Res Ther Review OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was (1) to give an overview of the available short screening instruments for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and (2) to review the psychometric properties of these instruments. METHODS: First, a systematic search of titles and abstracts of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted between February and July 2015 and updated in April 2016 and May 2018. Only papers written in English or Dutch were considered. All full-text papers about cognitive screening instruments for the early detection of AD were included, resulting in the identification of 38 pencil and paper tests and 12 computer tests. In a second step, the psychometric quality of these instruments was evaluated. Therefore, the same databases were searched again to identify papers that described the psychometric properties of the instruments meanwhile applying diagnostic criteria for the diagnostic groups included. RESULTS: Out of 1454 papers, 96 clearly discussed the psychometric properties of the instruments. Eighty-nine papers discussed pencil and paper tests of which 80 were validated in a memory clinic setting. Based on the number of studies (31 articles) and the sensitivity (84%) and specificity (74%) values, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) seems to be a promising (pencil and paper) screening test for memory clinic testing as well as for population screening. Regarding computer tests, validation studies were only available for 7 out of 12 tests. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of screening tests for AD are available. However, most tests are only validated in a memory clinic setting and description of the psychometric properties of the instruments is limited. Especially, computer tests require further research. The MoCA is a promising instrument, but the specificity to detect early AD is rather low. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6396539/ /pubmed/30819244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
De Roeck, Ellen Elisa
De Deyn, Peter Paul
Dierckx, Eva
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review
title Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review
title_full Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review
title_fullStr Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review
title_short Brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review
title_sort brief cognitive screening instruments for early detection of alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3
work_keys_str_mv AT deroeckellenelisa briefcognitivescreeninginstrumentsforearlydetectionofalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview
AT dedeynpeterpaul briefcognitivescreeninginstrumentsforearlydetectionofalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview
AT dierckxeva briefcognitivescreeninginstrumentsforearlydetectionofalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview
AT engelborghssebastiaan briefcognitivescreeninginstrumentsforearlydetectionofalzheimersdiseaseasystematicreview