Cargando…

Field validation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever in cattle

BACKGROUND: Wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever (WA-MCF) is a fatal disease of cattle. Outbreaks are seasonal and associated with close interaction between cattle and calving wildebeest. In Kenya, WA-MCF has a dramatic effect on cattle-keepers who lose up to 10% of their cattle herds per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orono, Sheillah Ayiela, Gitao, George Chege, Mpatswenumugabo, Jean Pierre, Chepkwony, Maurine, Mutisya, Christine, Okoth, Edward, Bronsvoort, Barend Mark de Clare, Russell, George Cameron, Nene, Vishvanath, Cook, Elizabeth Anne Jessie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1818-8
_version_ 1783399272515895296
author Orono, Sheillah Ayiela
Gitao, George Chege
Mpatswenumugabo, Jean Pierre
Chepkwony, Maurine
Mutisya, Christine
Okoth, Edward
Bronsvoort, Barend Mark de Clare
Russell, George Cameron
Nene, Vishvanath
Cook, Elizabeth Anne Jessie
author_facet Orono, Sheillah Ayiela
Gitao, George Chege
Mpatswenumugabo, Jean Pierre
Chepkwony, Maurine
Mutisya, Christine
Okoth, Edward
Bronsvoort, Barend Mark de Clare
Russell, George Cameron
Nene, Vishvanath
Cook, Elizabeth Anne Jessie
author_sort Orono, Sheillah Ayiela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever (WA-MCF) is a fatal disease of cattle. Outbreaks are seasonal and associated with close interaction between cattle and calving wildebeest. In Kenya, WA-MCF has a dramatic effect on cattle-keepers who lose up to 10% of their cattle herds per year. The objective of this study was to report the impact of WA-MCF on a commercial ranch and assess the performance of clinical diagnosis compared to laboratory diagnosis as a disease management tool. A retrospective study of WA-MCF in cattle was conducted from 2014 to 2016 at Kapiti Plains Ranch Ltd., Kenya. During this period, 325 animals showed clinical signs of WA-MCF and of these, 123 were opportunistically sampled. In addition, 51 clinically healthy animals were sampled. Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used to confirm clinically diagnosed cases of WA-MCF. A latent class model (LCM) was used to evaluate the diagnostic parameters of clinical diagnosis and the tests in the absence of a gold standard. RESULTS: By PCR, 94% (95% C.I. 89–97%) of clinically affected animals were positive to WA-MCF while 63% (95% C.I. 54–71%) were positive by indirect ELISA. The LCM demonstrated the indirect ELISA had poor sensitivity 63.3% (95% PCI 54.4–71.7%) and specificity 62.6% (95% PCI 39.2–84.9%) while the nested PCR performed better with sensitivity 96.1% (95% PCI 90.7–99.7%) and specificity 92.9% (95% PCI 76.1–99.8%). The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis were 99.1% (95% PCI 96.8–100.0%) and 71.5% (95% PCI 48.0–97.2%) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical diagnosis was demonstrated to be an effective method to identify affected animals although animals may be incorrectly classified resulting in financial loss. The study revealed indirect ELISA as a poor test and nested PCR to be a more appropriate confirmatory test for diagnosing acute WA-MCF. However, the logistics of PCR make it unsuitable for field diagnosis of WA-MCF. The future of WA-MCF diagnosis should be aimed at development of penside techniques, which will allow for fast detection in the field. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-1818-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6396541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63965412019-03-13 Field validation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever in cattle Orono, Sheillah Ayiela Gitao, George Chege Mpatswenumugabo, Jean Pierre Chepkwony, Maurine Mutisya, Christine Okoth, Edward Bronsvoort, Barend Mark de Clare Russell, George Cameron Nene, Vishvanath Cook, Elizabeth Anne Jessie BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever (WA-MCF) is a fatal disease of cattle. Outbreaks are seasonal and associated with close interaction between cattle and calving wildebeest. In Kenya, WA-MCF has a dramatic effect on cattle-keepers who lose up to 10% of their cattle herds per year. The objective of this study was to report the impact of WA-MCF on a commercial ranch and assess the performance of clinical diagnosis compared to laboratory diagnosis as a disease management tool. A retrospective study of WA-MCF in cattle was conducted from 2014 to 2016 at Kapiti Plains Ranch Ltd., Kenya. During this period, 325 animals showed clinical signs of WA-MCF and of these, 123 were opportunistically sampled. In addition, 51 clinically healthy animals were sampled. Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used to confirm clinically diagnosed cases of WA-MCF. A latent class model (LCM) was used to evaluate the diagnostic parameters of clinical diagnosis and the tests in the absence of a gold standard. RESULTS: By PCR, 94% (95% C.I. 89–97%) of clinically affected animals were positive to WA-MCF while 63% (95% C.I. 54–71%) were positive by indirect ELISA. The LCM demonstrated the indirect ELISA had poor sensitivity 63.3% (95% PCI 54.4–71.7%) and specificity 62.6% (95% PCI 39.2–84.9%) while the nested PCR performed better with sensitivity 96.1% (95% PCI 90.7–99.7%) and specificity 92.9% (95% PCI 76.1–99.8%). The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis were 99.1% (95% PCI 96.8–100.0%) and 71.5% (95% PCI 48.0–97.2%) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical diagnosis was demonstrated to be an effective method to identify affected animals although animals may be incorrectly classified resulting in financial loss. The study revealed indirect ELISA as a poor test and nested PCR to be a more appropriate confirmatory test for diagnosing acute WA-MCF. However, the logistics of PCR make it unsuitable for field diagnosis of WA-MCF. The future of WA-MCF diagnosis should be aimed at development of penside techniques, which will allow for fast detection in the field. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-1818-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6396541/ /pubmed/30819152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1818-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Orono, Sheillah Ayiela
Gitao, George Chege
Mpatswenumugabo, Jean Pierre
Chepkwony, Maurine
Mutisya, Christine
Okoth, Edward
Bronsvoort, Barend Mark de Clare
Russell, George Cameron
Nene, Vishvanath
Cook, Elizabeth Anne Jessie
Field validation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever in cattle
title Field validation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever in cattle
title_full Field validation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever in cattle
title_fullStr Field validation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever in cattle
title_full_unstemmed Field validation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever in cattle
title_short Field validation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever in cattle
title_sort field validation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever in cattle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1818-8
work_keys_str_mv AT oronosheillahayiela fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle
AT gitaogeorgechege fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle
AT mpatswenumugabojeanpierre fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle
AT chepkwonymaurine fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle
AT mutisyachristine fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle
AT okothedward fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle
AT bronsvoortbarendmarkdeclare fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle
AT russellgeorgecameron fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle
AT nenevishvanath fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle
AT cookelizabethannejessie fieldvalidationofclinicalandlaboratorydiagnosisofwildebeestassociatedmalignantcatarrhalfeverincattle