Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF

STUDY QUESTION: Does an individualized serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) based FSH dosing algorithm used in a GnRH antagonist protocol increase the proportion of patients with an intended number of oocytes (5–14) retrieved compared with a standard regimen? SUMMARY ANSWER: The AMH-based individualiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friis Petersen, J, Løkkegaard, E, Andersen, L F, Torp, K, Egeberg, A, Hedegaard, L, Nysom, D, Nyboe Andersen, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz003
_version_ 1783399296624754688
author Friis Petersen, J
Løkkegaard, E
Andersen, L F
Torp, K
Egeberg, A
Hedegaard, L
Nysom, D
Nyboe Andersen, A
author_facet Friis Petersen, J
Løkkegaard, E
Andersen, L F
Torp, K
Egeberg, A
Hedegaard, L
Nysom, D
Nyboe Andersen, A
author_sort Friis Petersen, J
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: Does an individualized serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) based FSH dosing algorithm used in a GnRH antagonist protocol increase the proportion of patients with an intended number of oocytes (5–14) retrieved compared with a standard regimen? SUMMARY ANSWER: The AMH-based individualized algorithm did not increase the proportion of patients with an intended oocyte retrieval. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Individualizing treatment for ovarian stimulation by serum AMH or antral follicle count can theoretically improve the ratio between benefits and risks. Current data suggest that there may be a reduced risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), but without improved pregnancy or live birth rates. Only two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the potential of AMH-based algorithms to optimize the FSH dosing in ovarian stimulation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A dual-center open-label investigator-driven RCT was conducted between January 2013 and November 2016. Eligibility was assessed in 269 women and 221 were randomized 2:1 between individualized and standard dosing groups. Women with pretreatment serum AMH > 24 pmol/L had 100 IU/day of recombinant FSH (rFSH); AMH 12–24 pmol/L had 150 IU/day of rFSH, and AMH < 12 pmol/L had maximal stimulation with corifollitropin 100 or 150 mg depending on bodyweight ±60 kg. The standard group had 150 IU/day of rFSH irrespective of pretreatment AMH. All patients followed the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The sample size calculation assumed that individualized dosing by AMH would reduce the proportion of unintended oocyte yield (outside the 5–14 range) by 50%, from 35 to 17.5%. In a 2:1 randomization this required 216 patients: 144 in the individualized and 72 patients in the standard group (80% power, 5% significance). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All women had a presumed ovulatory normal menstrual cycle, were aged 25–38 years, weighed < 75 kg, had pretreatment AMH 4–40 pmol/L, did their first IVF or ICSI cycle and had two ovaries accessible to oocyte retrieval. Recruitment was conducted from both participating sites. Women were excluded if diagnosed with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis grade III/IV, hydrosalpings on ultrasound, recurrent miscarriages (≥3), FSH > 12 IU/L or major medical disorders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After randomization 149 women were allocated to the individualized group and 72 to the standard group. The primary outcome of women with an intended (5–14) number of oocytes retrieved was similar in the individualized (n = 105) versus the standard (n = 55) rFSH treatment group (72% [95% CI 64–79%] versus 78% [95% CI 67–86%], respectively, P = 0.68, between group standardized mean difference (SMD) −6%, 95% CI: −19–8%). In the high AMH stratum of the individualized group, significantly more women (n = 13) had an unintended low number of oocytes (<5) retrieved (38% [95% CI: 23–55%]) compared with the standard group (6% [95% CI 0.3–24%], P = 0.029, between group SMD 32%, 95% CI: 9–56%). Conversely, in the low pretreatment AMH stratum, individualized dosing using corifollitropin reduced the proportion of unintended low responders to 24% (95% CI: 12–40%) compared with 47% (95% CI: 26–69%) in the standard group, P = 0.10, between group SMD −23% (95% CI: −54–8%). OHSS was diagnosed in four women (two in each study arm), and all cases were mild. Daily luteal phase questionnaire reporting showed similar wellbeing in terms of abdominal distention, abdominal pain, dyspnea and occurrence of bleeding between groups. The cumulative live birth rate per started cycle was similar (32 and 35%) comparing the individualized with the standard group. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was powered for showing differences only in the distribution of oocyte retrieval when comparing individualized and standard groups, therefore additional results should be viewed with caution. In addition, there was a change of AMH assay halfway through the study period and the possibility that corifollitropin being introduced to a subgroup of the intervention has introduced confounding cannot be ruled out. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS: In the expected high responder AMH stratum, 100 IU/day is an insufficient rFSH dose in a high proportion of patients. Further research might explore the 125 IU/day dose for the high AMH segment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None for the submitted work. ICMJE declared personal interests for two of the authors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUDRACT registration number: 2012-004969-40. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 27 November 2012. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT: 10 January 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6396645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63966452019-03-20 A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF Friis Petersen, J Løkkegaard, E Andersen, L F Torp, K Egeberg, A Hedegaard, L Nysom, D Nyboe Andersen, A Hum Reprod Open Original Article STUDY QUESTION: Does an individualized serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) based FSH dosing algorithm used in a GnRH antagonist protocol increase the proportion of patients with an intended number of oocytes (5–14) retrieved compared with a standard regimen? SUMMARY ANSWER: The AMH-based individualized algorithm did not increase the proportion of patients with an intended oocyte retrieval. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Individualizing treatment for ovarian stimulation by serum AMH or antral follicle count can theoretically improve the ratio between benefits and risks. Current data suggest that there may be a reduced risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), but without improved pregnancy or live birth rates. Only two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the potential of AMH-based algorithms to optimize the FSH dosing in ovarian stimulation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A dual-center open-label investigator-driven RCT was conducted between January 2013 and November 2016. Eligibility was assessed in 269 women and 221 were randomized 2:1 between individualized and standard dosing groups. Women with pretreatment serum AMH > 24 pmol/L had 100 IU/day of recombinant FSH (rFSH); AMH 12–24 pmol/L had 150 IU/day of rFSH, and AMH < 12 pmol/L had maximal stimulation with corifollitropin 100 or 150 mg depending on bodyweight ±60 kg. The standard group had 150 IU/day of rFSH irrespective of pretreatment AMH. All patients followed the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The sample size calculation assumed that individualized dosing by AMH would reduce the proportion of unintended oocyte yield (outside the 5–14 range) by 50%, from 35 to 17.5%. In a 2:1 randomization this required 216 patients: 144 in the individualized and 72 patients in the standard group (80% power, 5% significance). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All women had a presumed ovulatory normal menstrual cycle, were aged 25–38 years, weighed < 75 kg, had pretreatment AMH 4–40 pmol/L, did their first IVF or ICSI cycle and had two ovaries accessible to oocyte retrieval. Recruitment was conducted from both participating sites. Women were excluded if diagnosed with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis grade III/IV, hydrosalpings on ultrasound, recurrent miscarriages (≥3), FSH > 12 IU/L or major medical disorders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After randomization 149 women were allocated to the individualized group and 72 to the standard group. The primary outcome of women with an intended (5–14) number of oocytes retrieved was similar in the individualized (n = 105) versus the standard (n = 55) rFSH treatment group (72% [95% CI 64–79%] versus 78% [95% CI 67–86%], respectively, P = 0.68, between group standardized mean difference (SMD) −6%, 95% CI: −19–8%). In the high AMH stratum of the individualized group, significantly more women (n = 13) had an unintended low number of oocytes (<5) retrieved (38% [95% CI: 23–55%]) compared with the standard group (6% [95% CI 0.3–24%], P = 0.029, between group SMD 32%, 95% CI: 9–56%). Conversely, in the low pretreatment AMH stratum, individualized dosing using corifollitropin reduced the proportion of unintended low responders to 24% (95% CI: 12–40%) compared with 47% (95% CI: 26–69%) in the standard group, P = 0.10, between group SMD −23% (95% CI: −54–8%). OHSS was diagnosed in four women (two in each study arm), and all cases were mild. Daily luteal phase questionnaire reporting showed similar wellbeing in terms of abdominal distention, abdominal pain, dyspnea and occurrence of bleeding between groups. The cumulative live birth rate per started cycle was similar (32 and 35%) comparing the individualized with the standard group. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was powered for showing differences only in the distribution of oocyte retrieval when comparing individualized and standard groups, therefore additional results should be viewed with caution. In addition, there was a change of AMH assay halfway through the study period and the possibility that corifollitropin being introduced to a subgroup of the intervention has introduced confounding cannot be ruled out. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS: In the expected high responder AMH stratum, 100 IU/day is an insufficient rFSH dose in a high proportion of patients. Further research might explore the 125 IU/day dose for the high AMH segment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None for the submitted work. ICMJE declared personal interests for two of the authors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUDRACT registration number: 2012-004969-40. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 27 November 2012. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT: 10 January 2013. Oxford University Press 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6396645/ /pubmed/30895268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz003 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Friis Petersen, J
Løkkegaard, E
Andersen, L F
Torp, K
Egeberg, A
Hedegaard, L
Nysom, D
Nyboe Andersen, A
A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF
title A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF
title_full A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF
title_short A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF
title_sort randomized controlled trial of amh-based individualized fsh dosing in a gnrh antagonist protocol for ivf
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz003
work_keys_str_mv AT friispetersenj arandomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT løkkegaarde arandomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT andersenlf arandomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT torpk arandomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT egeberga arandomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT hedegaardl arandomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT nysomd arandomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT nyboeandersena arandomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT friispetersenj randomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT løkkegaarde randomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT andersenlf randomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT torpk randomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT egeberga randomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT hedegaardl randomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT nysomd randomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf
AT nyboeandersena randomizedcontrolledtrialofamhbasedindividualizedfshdosinginagnrhantagonistprotocolforivf