Cargando…

Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center?

INTRODUCTION: Experts suggest health care institutions switch focus from measuring burnout to measuring positive organizational psychology. Concerns include burnout being a late sign of organizational decline. The Baldrige survey is promoted by the U.S. Department of Commerce to measure positive wor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badgett, Robert, Chen, Jiatian, May, Douglas R., Field, Tom, Greiner, K. Allen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Kansas Medical Center 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30854161
_version_ 1783399350896951296
author Badgett, Robert
Chen, Jiatian
May, Douglas R.
Field, Tom
Greiner, K. Allen
author_facet Badgett, Robert
Chen, Jiatian
May, Douglas R.
Field, Tom
Greiner, K. Allen
author_sort Badgett, Robert
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Experts suggest health care institutions switch focus from measuring burnout to measuring positive organizational psychology. Concerns include burnout being a late sign of organizational decline. The Baldrige survey is promoted by the U.S. Department of Commerce to measure positive worksite conditions (e.g., workforce wellbeing of industries, including health care and education). For years, the survey has been completed by managers within organizations, but now the same survey is promoted for completion by an organization’s workforce. We tested the structure of the Baldrige survey when completed by an academic health care workforce. In addition, we tested whether the results in an academic worksite correlate with an example metric of an organizational mission. METHODS: In 2015, our academic health center surveyed faculty and staff with the Baldrige survey. The validity of the Baldrige was tested with confirmatory factor analyses. Within the School of Medicine, responses for the Baldrige’s concepts were correlated against a measure of organizational outcome: graduates’ assessments of Departmental educational quality. RESULTS: The structure of the Baldrige survey did not validate when assessed by a workforce (RMSEA = 0.086; CFI = 0.829; TLI = 0.815). None of its concepts correlated with learner reported educational quality. CONCLUSIONS: The Baldrige survey, when administered to a workforce rather than managers, did not appear to measure workforce well-being within an academic health care center. We discourage use of the current survey for this purpose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6396958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher University of Kansas Medical Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63969582019-03-08 Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center? Badgett, Robert Chen, Jiatian May, Douglas R. Field, Tom Greiner, K. Allen Kans J Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Experts suggest health care institutions switch focus from measuring burnout to measuring positive organizational psychology. Concerns include burnout being a late sign of organizational decline. The Baldrige survey is promoted by the U.S. Department of Commerce to measure positive worksite conditions (e.g., workforce wellbeing of industries, including health care and education). For years, the survey has been completed by managers within organizations, but now the same survey is promoted for completion by an organization’s workforce. We tested the structure of the Baldrige survey when completed by an academic health care workforce. In addition, we tested whether the results in an academic worksite correlate with an example metric of an organizational mission. METHODS: In 2015, our academic health center surveyed faculty and staff with the Baldrige survey. The validity of the Baldrige was tested with confirmatory factor analyses. Within the School of Medicine, responses for the Baldrige’s concepts were correlated against a measure of organizational outcome: graduates’ assessments of Departmental educational quality. RESULTS: The structure of the Baldrige survey did not validate when assessed by a workforce (RMSEA = 0.086; CFI = 0.829; TLI = 0.815). None of its concepts correlated with learner reported educational quality. CONCLUSIONS: The Baldrige survey, when administered to a workforce rather than managers, did not appear to measure workforce well-being within an academic health care center. We discourage use of the current survey for this purpose. University of Kansas Medical Center 2019-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6396958/ /pubmed/30854161 Text en © 2019 The University of Kansas Medical Center This is an open access article under the terms of the Attribution-ShareAlike CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) . This license Lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research
Badgett, Robert
Chen, Jiatian
May, Douglas R.
Field, Tom
Greiner, K. Allen
Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center?
title Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center?
title_full Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center?
title_fullStr Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center?
title_full_unstemmed Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center?
title_short Can the Federal Baldrige Survey Measure Workforce Well-being in an Academic Health Center?
title_sort can the federal baldrige survey measure workforce well-being in an academic health center?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6396958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30854161
work_keys_str_mv AT badgettrobert canthefederalbaldrigesurveymeasureworkforcewellbeinginanacademichealthcenter
AT chenjiatian canthefederalbaldrigesurveymeasureworkforcewellbeinginanacademichealthcenter
AT maydouglasr canthefederalbaldrigesurveymeasureworkforcewellbeinginanacademichealthcenter
AT fieldtom canthefederalbaldrigesurveymeasureworkforcewellbeinginanacademichealthcenter
AT greinerkallen canthefederalbaldrigesurveymeasureworkforcewellbeinginanacademichealthcenter