Cargando…

Distribution of organic and inorganic mercury across the pelts of Canadian river otter (Lontra canadensis)

Fur is a common biomarker of environmental mercury (Hg) exposure. Further, there are well-established relationships between total mercury (THg) in fur and organs. However, these models assumed that THg is uniformly distributed across the fur in a pelt. In this study, we assess the distribution of TH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eccles, Kristin M., Littlewood, Eric S., Thomas, Philippe J., Chan, Hing Man
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30824798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39893-w
_version_ 1783399396635836416
author Eccles, Kristin M.
Littlewood, Eric S.
Thomas, Philippe J.
Chan, Hing Man
author_facet Eccles, Kristin M.
Littlewood, Eric S.
Thomas, Philippe J.
Chan, Hing Man
author_sort Eccles, Kristin M.
collection PubMed
description Fur is a common biomarker of environmental mercury (Hg) exposure. Further, there are well-established relationships between total mercury (THg) in fur and organs. However, these models assumed that THg is uniformly distributed across the fur in a pelt. In this study, we assess the distribution of THg and methylmercury (MeHg) across the pelts of four river otters (Lontra canadensis). THg concentrations were measured in the topcoat (n = 95) and undercoat fur (n = 95). MeHg was measured in a subset of these samples (n = 10). Patterns of THg and MeHg were explored using cluster analyses and ANOVAs. Significant differences existed between THg in topcoat and undercoat and between anatomical region (head/body/tail/legs) and fur regions (dorsal/ventral/furline). The cluster analysis showed significant THg clusters in undercoat fur and to a lesser extent topcoat fur. Further, the error rate for predicting internal THg is lowest in the forebody region of the topcoat, thus, making this the optimal region to sample for biomonitoring. Fur samples taken outside of this region could result in prediction error as high as 140% when estimating internal organ THg. The ratio of MeHg in THg in topcoat fur was measured at 95.7 ± 3.4% indicating THg concentrations can be used to assess MeHg exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6397270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63972702019-03-05 Distribution of organic and inorganic mercury across the pelts of Canadian river otter (Lontra canadensis) Eccles, Kristin M. Littlewood, Eric S. Thomas, Philippe J. Chan, Hing Man Sci Rep Article Fur is a common biomarker of environmental mercury (Hg) exposure. Further, there are well-established relationships between total mercury (THg) in fur and organs. However, these models assumed that THg is uniformly distributed across the fur in a pelt. In this study, we assess the distribution of THg and methylmercury (MeHg) across the pelts of four river otters (Lontra canadensis). THg concentrations were measured in the topcoat (n = 95) and undercoat fur (n = 95). MeHg was measured in a subset of these samples (n = 10). Patterns of THg and MeHg were explored using cluster analyses and ANOVAs. Significant differences existed between THg in topcoat and undercoat and between anatomical region (head/body/tail/legs) and fur regions (dorsal/ventral/furline). The cluster analysis showed significant THg clusters in undercoat fur and to a lesser extent topcoat fur. Further, the error rate for predicting internal THg is lowest in the forebody region of the topcoat, thus, making this the optimal region to sample for biomonitoring. Fur samples taken outside of this region could result in prediction error as high as 140% when estimating internal organ THg. The ratio of MeHg in THg in topcoat fur was measured at 95.7 ± 3.4% indicating THg concentrations can be used to assess MeHg exposure. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6397270/ /pubmed/30824798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39893-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Eccles, Kristin M.
Littlewood, Eric S.
Thomas, Philippe J.
Chan, Hing Man
Distribution of organic and inorganic mercury across the pelts of Canadian river otter (Lontra canadensis)
title Distribution of organic and inorganic mercury across the pelts of Canadian river otter (Lontra canadensis)
title_full Distribution of organic and inorganic mercury across the pelts of Canadian river otter (Lontra canadensis)
title_fullStr Distribution of organic and inorganic mercury across the pelts of Canadian river otter (Lontra canadensis)
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of organic and inorganic mercury across the pelts of Canadian river otter (Lontra canadensis)
title_short Distribution of organic and inorganic mercury across the pelts of Canadian river otter (Lontra canadensis)
title_sort distribution of organic and inorganic mercury across the pelts of canadian river otter (lontra canadensis)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30824798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39893-w
work_keys_str_mv AT eccleskristinm distributionoforganicandinorganicmercuryacrossthepeltsofcanadianriverotterlontracanadensis
AT littlewooderics distributionoforganicandinorganicmercuryacrossthepeltsofcanadianriverotterlontracanadensis
AT thomasphilippej distributionoforganicandinorganicmercuryacrossthepeltsofcanadianriverotterlontracanadensis
AT chanhingman distributionoforganicandinorganicmercuryacrossthepeltsofcanadianriverotterlontracanadensis