Cargando…
The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model
OBJECTIVES: Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone stra...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2 |
_version_ | 1783399410568265728 |
---|---|
author | Danese, I. Pankaj, P. Scott, C. E. H. |
author_facet | Danese, I. Pankaj, P. Scott, C. E. H. |
author_sort | Danese, I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone strain, using an experimentally validated finite element model (FEM). METHODS: A previously experimentally validated FEM of a composite tibia implanted with a cemented fixed-bearing UKA (MB and AP) was used. Standard alignment (medial proximal tibial angle 90°, 6° posterior slope), coronal malalignment (3°, 5°, 10° varus; 3°, 5° valgus), and sagittal malalignment (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°, 12°) were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the volume of compressively overstrained cancellous bone (VOCB) < -3000 µε. The secondary outcome measure was maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone (MSCB) over a medial region of interest. RESULTS: Varus malalignment decreased VOCB but increased MSCB in both implants, more so in the AP implant. Varus malalignment of 10° reduced the VOCB by 10% and 3% in AP and MB implants but increased the MSCB by 14% and 13%, respectively. Valgus malalignment of 5° increased the VOCB by 8% and 4% in AP and MB implants, with reductions in MSCB of 7% and 10%, respectively. Sagittal malalignment displayed negligible effects. Well-aligned AP implants displayed greater VOCB than malaligned MB implants. CONCLUSION: All-polyethylene implants are more sensitive to coronal plane malalignments than MB implants are; varus malalignment reduced cancellous bone strain but increased anteromedial cortical bone stress. Sagittal plane malalignment has a negligible effect on bone strain. Cite this article: I. Danese, P. Pankaj, C. E. H. Scott. The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:55–64. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6397332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63973322019-03-26 The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model Danese, I. Pankaj, P. Scott, C. E. H. Bone Joint Res Biomechanics OBJECTIVES: Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone strain, using an experimentally validated finite element model (FEM). METHODS: A previously experimentally validated FEM of a composite tibia implanted with a cemented fixed-bearing UKA (MB and AP) was used. Standard alignment (medial proximal tibial angle 90°, 6° posterior slope), coronal malalignment (3°, 5°, 10° varus; 3°, 5° valgus), and sagittal malalignment (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°, 12°) were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the volume of compressively overstrained cancellous bone (VOCB) < -3000 µε. The secondary outcome measure was maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone (MSCB) over a medial region of interest. RESULTS: Varus malalignment decreased VOCB but increased MSCB in both implants, more so in the AP implant. Varus malalignment of 10° reduced the VOCB by 10% and 3% in AP and MB implants but increased the MSCB by 14% and 13%, respectively. Valgus malalignment of 5° increased the VOCB by 8% and 4% in AP and MB implants, with reductions in MSCB of 7% and 10%, respectively. Sagittal malalignment displayed negligible effects. Well-aligned AP implants displayed greater VOCB than malaligned MB implants. CONCLUSION: All-polyethylene implants are more sensitive to coronal plane malalignments than MB implants are; varus malalignment reduced cancellous bone strain but increased anteromedial cortical bone stress. Sagittal plane malalignment has a negligible effect on bone strain. Cite this article: I. Danese, P. Pankaj, C. E. H. Scott. The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:55–64. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2. 2019-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6397332/ /pubmed/30915211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2 Text en © 2019 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biomechanics Danese, I. Pankaj, P. Scott, C. E. H. The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model |
title | The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model |
title_full | The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model |
title_fullStr | The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model |
title_short | The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model |
title_sort | effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model |
topic | Biomechanics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danesei theeffectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel AT pankajp theeffectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel AT scottceh theeffectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel AT danesei effectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel AT pankajp effectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel AT scottceh effectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel |