Cargando…

The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model

OBJECTIVES: Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone stra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danese, I., Pankaj, P., Scott, C. E. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2
_version_ 1783399410568265728
author Danese, I.
Pankaj, P.
Scott, C. E. H.
author_facet Danese, I.
Pankaj, P.
Scott, C. E. H.
author_sort Danese, I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone strain, using an experimentally validated finite element model (FEM). METHODS: A previously experimentally validated FEM of a composite tibia implanted with a cemented fixed-bearing UKA (MB and AP) was used. Standard alignment (medial proximal tibial angle 90°, 6° posterior slope), coronal malalignment (3°, 5°, 10° varus; 3°, 5° valgus), and sagittal malalignment (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°, 12°) were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the volume of compressively overstrained cancellous bone (VOCB) < -3000 µε. The secondary outcome measure was maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone (MSCB) over a medial region of interest. RESULTS: Varus malalignment decreased VOCB but increased MSCB in both implants, more so in the AP implant. Varus malalignment of 10° reduced the VOCB by 10% and 3% in AP and MB implants but increased the MSCB by 14% and 13%, respectively. Valgus malalignment of 5° increased the VOCB by 8% and 4% in AP and MB implants, with reductions in MSCB of 7% and 10%, respectively. Sagittal malalignment displayed negligible effects. Well-aligned AP implants displayed greater VOCB than malaligned MB implants. CONCLUSION: All-polyethylene implants are more sensitive to coronal plane malalignments than MB implants are; varus malalignment reduced cancellous bone strain but increased anteromedial cortical bone stress. Sagittal plane malalignment has a negligible effect on bone strain. Cite this article: I. Danese, P. Pankaj, C. E. H. Scott. The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:55–64. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6397332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63973322019-03-26 The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model Danese, I. Pankaj, P. Scott, C. E. H. Bone Joint Res Biomechanics OBJECTIVES: Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone strain, using an experimentally validated finite element model (FEM). METHODS: A previously experimentally validated FEM of a composite tibia implanted with a cemented fixed-bearing UKA (MB and AP) was used. Standard alignment (medial proximal tibial angle 90°, 6° posterior slope), coronal malalignment (3°, 5°, 10° varus; 3°, 5° valgus), and sagittal malalignment (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°, 12°) were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the volume of compressively overstrained cancellous bone (VOCB) < -3000 µε. The secondary outcome measure was maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone (MSCB) over a medial region of interest. RESULTS: Varus malalignment decreased VOCB but increased MSCB in both implants, more so in the AP implant. Varus malalignment of 10° reduced the VOCB by 10% and 3% in AP and MB implants but increased the MSCB by 14% and 13%, respectively. Valgus malalignment of 5° increased the VOCB by 8% and 4% in AP and MB implants, with reductions in MSCB of 7% and 10%, respectively. Sagittal malalignment displayed negligible effects. Well-aligned AP implants displayed greater VOCB than malaligned MB implants. CONCLUSION: All-polyethylene implants are more sensitive to coronal plane malalignments than MB implants are; varus malalignment reduced cancellous bone strain but increased anteromedial cortical bone stress. Sagittal plane malalignment has a negligible effect on bone strain. Cite this article: I. Danese, P. Pankaj, C. E. H. Scott. The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:55–64. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2. 2019-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6397332/ /pubmed/30915211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2 Text en © 2019 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biomechanics
Danese, I.
Pankaj, P.
Scott, C. E. H.
The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model
title The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model
title_full The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model
title_fullStr The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model
title_full_unstemmed The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model
title_short The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model
title_sort effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model
topic Biomechanics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2
work_keys_str_mv AT danesei theeffectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT pankajp theeffectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT scottceh theeffectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT danesei effectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT pankajp effectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel
AT scottceh effectofmalalignmentonproximaltibialstraininfixedbearingunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyacomparisonbetweenmetalbackedandallpolyethylenecomponentsusingavalidatedfiniteelementmodel