Cargando…

Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations

BACKGROUND: Wild birds using livestock facilities for food and shelter may contribute to dissemination of enteric pathogens or antimicrobial resistant bacteria. However, drivers of microbial exchange among wildlife and livestock are not well characterized. Predisposition for acquiring and retaining...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tormoehlen, Kristin, Johnson-Walker, Yvette J., Lankau, Emily W., Myint, Maung San, Herrmann, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834183
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6460
_version_ 1783399445037056000
author Tormoehlen, Kristin
Johnson-Walker, Yvette J.
Lankau, Emily W.
Myint, Maung San
Herrmann, John A.
author_facet Tormoehlen, Kristin
Johnson-Walker, Yvette J.
Lankau, Emily W.
Myint, Maung San
Herrmann, John A.
author_sort Tormoehlen, Kristin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wild birds using livestock facilities for food and shelter may contribute to dissemination of enteric pathogens or antimicrobial resistant bacteria. However, drivers of microbial exchange among wildlife and livestock are not well characterized. Predisposition for acquiring and retaining environmental bacteria may vary among species because of physiologic or behavioral differences, complicating selection of a bacterial model that can accurately characterize microbial connections among hosts of interest. This study compares the prevalence and antibiotic resistance phenotypes of two potential model bacterial organisms isolated from wild birds and their environments. METHODS: We compared prevalence and resistance profiles of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus species isolated from environmental swabs and bird feces on a residential control site, a confinement dairy, a pasture-based beef farm, and a confinement beef farm. RESULTS: Bird feces at all sites had low-to-moderate prevalence of Escherichia coli (range: 17–47%), despite potential for exposure on farms (range: 63–97%). Few Escherichia coli were isolated from the control environment. Enterococcus faecalis was dominant in birds at both beef farms (62% and 81% of Enterococcus isolates) and low-to-moderately prevalent at the dairy and control sites (29% and 23% of isolates, respectively). Antimicrobial resistance prevalence was higher in farm samples compared to those from the residential control, but distribution of resistant isolates varied between the bacterial genera. Birds on all farms carried resistant Enterococcus at similar rates to that of the environment, but resistance was less common in bird-associated Escherichia coli despite presence of resistant isolates in the farm environment. DISCUSSION: Bacterial species studied may affect how readily bacterial exchange among populations is detected. Selection of microbial models must carefully consider both the questions being posed and how findings might influence resulting management decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6397636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63976362019-03-04 Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations Tormoehlen, Kristin Johnson-Walker, Yvette J. Lankau, Emily W. Myint, Maung San Herrmann, John A. PeerJ Agricultural Science BACKGROUND: Wild birds using livestock facilities for food and shelter may contribute to dissemination of enteric pathogens or antimicrobial resistant bacteria. However, drivers of microbial exchange among wildlife and livestock are not well characterized. Predisposition for acquiring and retaining environmental bacteria may vary among species because of physiologic or behavioral differences, complicating selection of a bacterial model that can accurately characterize microbial connections among hosts of interest. This study compares the prevalence and antibiotic resistance phenotypes of two potential model bacterial organisms isolated from wild birds and their environments. METHODS: We compared prevalence and resistance profiles of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus species isolated from environmental swabs and bird feces on a residential control site, a confinement dairy, a pasture-based beef farm, and a confinement beef farm. RESULTS: Bird feces at all sites had low-to-moderate prevalence of Escherichia coli (range: 17–47%), despite potential for exposure on farms (range: 63–97%). Few Escherichia coli were isolated from the control environment. Enterococcus faecalis was dominant in birds at both beef farms (62% and 81% of Enterococcus isolates) and low-to-moderately prevalent at the dairy and control sites (29% and 23% of isolates, respectively). Antimicrobial resistance prevalence was higher in farm samples compared to those from the residential control, but distribution of resistant isolates varied between the bacterial genera. Birds on all farms carried resistant Enterococcus at similar rates to that of the environment, but resistance was less common in bird-associated Escherichia coli despite presence of resistant isolates in the farm environment. DISCUSSION: Bacterial species studied may affect how readily bacterial exchange among populations is detected. Selection of microbial models must carefully consider both the questions being posed and how findings might influence resulting management decisions. PeerJ Inc. 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6397636/ /pubmed/30834183 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6460 Text en © 2019 Tormoehlen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Tormoehlen, Kristin
Johnson-Walker, Yvette J.
Lankau, Emily W.
Myint, Maung San
Herrmann, John A.
Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_full Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_fullStr Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_short Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_sort considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834183
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6460
work_keys_str_mv AT tormoehlenkristin considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations
AT johnsonwalkeryvettej considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations
AT lankauemilyw considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations
AT myintmaungsan considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations
AT herrmannjohna considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations