Cargando…

Thigh Ischemia-Reperfusion Model Does Not Accelerate Pulmonary VO(2) Kinetics at High Intensity Cycling Exercise

Background: We aimed to investigate the effect of a priming ischemia-reperfusion (IR) model on the kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO(2)) and cardiopulmonary parameters after high-intensity exercise. Our primary outcome was the overall VO(2) kinetics and secondary outcomes were heart rate (HR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helal, Lucas, do Nascimento Salvador, Paulo Cesar, de Lucas, Ricardo Dantas, Guglielmo, Luiz Guilherme Antonacci
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30858806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00160
_version_ 1783399474411864064
author Helal, Lucas
do Nascimento Salvador, Paulo Cesar
de Lucas, Ricardo Dantas
Guglielmo, Luiz Guilherme Antonacci
author_facet Helal, Lucas
do Nascimento Salvador, Paulo Cesar
de Lucas, Ricardo Dantas
Guglielmo, Luiz Guilherme Antonacci
author_sort Helal, Lucas
collection PubMed
description Background: We aimed to investigate the effect of a priming ischemia-reperfusion (IR) model on the kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO(2)) and cardiopulmonary parameters after high-intensity exercise. Our primary outcome was the overall VO(2) kinetics and secondary outcomes were heart rate (HR) and O(2) pulse kinetics. We hypothesized that the IR model would accelerate VO(2) and cardiopulmonary kinetics during the exercise. Methods: 10 recreationally active men (25.7 ± 4.7 years; 79.3 ± 10.8 kg; 177 ± 5 cm; 44.5 ± 6.2 mL kg(−1) min(−1)) performed a maximal incremental ramp test and four constant load sessions at the midpoint between ventilatory threshold and VO(2) max on separate days: two without IR (CON) and two with IR (IR). The IR model consisted of a thigh bi-lateral occlusion for 15 min at a pressure of 250 mmHg, followed by 3 min off, before high-intensity exercise bouts. Results: There were no significant differences for any VO(2) kinetics parameters (VO(2) base 1.08 ± 0.08 vs. 1.12 ± 0.06 L min(−1); P = 0.30; τ = 50.1 ± 7.0 vs. 47.9 ± 6.4 s; P = 0.47), as well as for HR (MRT(180s) 67.3 ± 6.0 vs. 71.3 ± 6.1 s; P = 0.54) and O(2) pulse kinetics (MRT(180s) 40.9 ± 3.9 vs. 48.2 ± 5.6 s; P = 0.31) between IR and CON conditions, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that the priming IR model used in this study had no influence on VO(2), HR, and O(2) pulse kinetics during high-intensity cycling exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6397857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63978572019-03-11 Thigh Ischemia-Reperfusion Model Does Not Accelerate Pulmonary VO(2) Kinetics at High Intensity Cycling Exercise Helal, Lucas do Nascimento Salvador, Paulo Cesar de Lucas, Ricardo Dantas Guglielmo, Luiz Guilherme Antonacci Front Physiol Physiology Background: We aimed to investigate the effect of a priming ischemia-reperfusion (IR) model on the kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO(2)) and cardiopulmonary parameters after high-intensity exercise. Our primary outcome was the overall VO(2) kinetics and secondary outcomes were heart rate (HR) and O(2) pulse kinetics. We hypothesized that the IR model would accelerate VO(2) and cardiopulmonary kinetics during the exercise. Methods: 10 recreationally active men (25.7 ± 4.7 years; 79.3 ± 10.8 kg; 177 ± 5 cm; 44.5 ± 6.2 mL kg(−1) min(−1)) performed a maximal incremental ramp test and four constant load sessions at the midpoint between ventilatory threshold and VO(2) max on separate days: two without IR (CON) and two with IR (IR). The IR model consisted of a thigh bi-lateral occlusion for 15 min at a pressure of 250 mmHg, followed by 3 min off, before high-intensity exercise bouts. Results: There were no significant differences for any VO(2) kinetics parameters (VO(2) base 1.08 ± 0.08 vs. 1.12 ± 0.06 L min(−1); P = 0.30; τ = 50.1 ± 7.0 vs. 47.9 ± 6.4 s; P = 0.47), as well as for HR (MRT(180s) 67.3 ± 6.0 vs. 71.3 ± 6.1 s; P = 0.54) and O(2) pulse kinetics (MRT(180s) 40.9 ± 3.9 vs. 48.2 ± 5.6 s; P = 0.31) between IR and CON conditions, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that the priming IR model used in this study had no influence on VO(2), HR, and O(2) pulse kinetics during high-intensity cycling exercise. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6397857/ /pubmed/30858806 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00160 Text en Copyright © 2019 Helal, do Nascimento Salvador, de Lucas and Guglielmo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Helal, Lucas
do Nascimento Salvador, Paulo Cesar
de Lucas, Ricardo Dantas
Guglielmo, Luiz Guilherme Antonacci
Thigh Ischemia-Reperfusion Model Does Not Accelerate Pulmonary VO(2) Kinetics at High Intensity Cycling Exercise
title Thigh Ischemia-Reperfusion Model Does Not Accelerate Pulmonary VO(2) Kinetics at High Intensity Cycling Exercise
title_full Thigh Ischemia-Reperfusion Model Does Not Accelerate Pulmonary VO(2) Kinetics at High Intensity Cycling Exercise
title_fullStr Thigh Ischemia-Reperfusion Model Does Not Accelerate Pulmonary VO(2) Kinetics at High Intensity Cycling Exercise
title_full_unstemmed Thigh Ischemia-Reperfusion Model Does Not Accelerate Pulmonary VO(2) Kinetics at High Intensity Cycling Exercise
title_short Thigh Ischemia-Reperfusion Model Does Not Accelerate Pulmonary VO(2) Kinetics at High Intensity Cycling Exercise
title_sort thigh ischemia-reperfusion model does not accelerate pulmonary vo(2) kinetics at high intensity cycling exercise
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30858806
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00160
work_keys_str_mv AT helallucas thighischemiareperfusionmodeldoesnotacceleratepulmonaryvo2kineticsathighintensitycyclingexercise
AT donascimentosalvadorpaulocesar thighischemiareperfusionmodeldoesnotacceleratepulmonaryvo2kineticsathighintensitycyclingexercise
AT delucasricardodantas thighischemiareperfusionmodeldoesnotacceleratepulmonaryvo2kineticsathighintensitycyclingexercise
AT guglielmoluizguilhermeantonacci thighischemiareperfusionmodeldoesnotacceleratepulmonaryvo2kineticsathighintensitycyclingexercise