Cargando…

Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter for retrocaval ureter and review of literature

PURPOSE: We present surgical techniques and operative results of laparoscopic reconstruction for patients with retrocaval ureter (RCU) and review similar papers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with RCU were enrolled in this study from April 2005 to January 2017. The mean age of 7 males and 3 fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Ill Young, Oh, Tae Hoon, Jeon, Seung Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838343
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2019.60.2.108
_version_ 1783399490349170688
author Seo, Ill Young
Oh, Tae Hoon
Jeon, Seung Hyun
author_facet Seo, Ill Young
Oh, Tae Hoon
Jeon, Seung Hyun
author_sort Seo, Ill Young
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We present surgical techniques and operative results of laparoscopic reconstruction for patients with retrocaval ureter (RCU) and review similar papers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with RCU were enrolled in this study from April 2005 to January 2017. The mean age of 7 males and 3 females was 40.5 years old. The chief complaint was flank pain in 6 patients; the remaining patients were detected incidentally. All patients showed hydronephrosis and typical S-shaped deformity of the ureter on imaging studies. Five patients showed obstructed patterns on the renal scans. Two surgeons performed laparoscopic ureteroureterostomies with transperitoneal approaches including excision of the compressed ureter. Double-J ureteral stents were inserted intraoperatively. The operative and follow-up results were checked and compared with published papers. RESULTS: All laparoscopic reconstructions were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 199.6 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 154.4 mL. No operative complications were encountered. There were no obstruction and symptom after the mean follow-up of 40.7 months. We found 7 papers from PubMed, which had more than five cases of laparoscopic reconstruction of RCU. We reviewed and summarized the clinical and operative parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter is a safe and effective treatment for RCU. Data from published papers and ours summarize clinical parameters of RCU, and suggest that the laparoscopic reconstruction can be considered as the standard treatment for it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6397927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63979272019-03-05 Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter for retrocaval ureter and review of literature Seo, Ill Young Oh, Tae Hoon Jeon, Seung Hyun Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: We present surgical techniques and operative results of laparoscopic reconstruction for patients with retrocaval ureter (RCU) and review similar papers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with RCU were enrolled in this study from April 2005 to January 2017. The mean age of 7 males and 3 females was 40.5 years old. The chief complaint was flank pain in 6 patients; the remaining patients were detected incidentally. All patients showed hydronephrosis and typical S-shaped deformity of the ureter on imaging studies. Five patients showed obstructed patterns on the renal scans. Two surgeons performed laparoscopic ureteroureterostomies with transperitoneal approaches including excision of the compressed ureter. Double-J ureteral stents were inserted intraoperatively. The operative and follow-up results were checked and compared with published papers. RESULTS: All laparoscopic reconstructions were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 199.6 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 154.4 mL. No operative complications were encountered. There were no obstruction and symptom after the mean follow-up of 40.7 months. We found 7 papers from PubMed, which had more than five cases of laparoscopic reconstruction of RCU. We reviewed and summarized the clinical and operative parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter is a safe and effective treatment for RCU. Data from published papers and ours summarize clinical parameters of RCU, and suggest that the laparoscopic reconstruction can be considered as the standard treatment for it. The Korean Urological Association 2019-03 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6397927/ /pubmed/30838343 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2019.60.2.108 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Seo, Ill Young
Oh, Tae Hoon
Jeon, Seung Hyun
Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter for retrocaval ureter and review of literature
title Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter for retrocaval ureter and review of literature
title_full Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter for retrocaval ureter and review of literature
title_fullStr Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter for retrocaval ureter and review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter for retrocaval ureter and review of literature
title_short Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter for retrocaval ureter and review of literature
title_sort transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy with excision of the compressed ureter for retrocaval ureter and review of literature
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30838343
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2019.60.2.108
work_keys_str_mv AT seoillyoung transperitoneallaparoscopicureteroureterostomywithexcisionofthecompressedureterforretrocavalureterandreviewofliterature
AT ohtaehoon transperitoneallaparoscopicureteroureterostomywithexcisionofthecompressedureterforretrocavalureterandreviewofliterature
AT jeonseunghyun transperitoneallaparoscopicureteroureterostomywithexcisionofthecompressedureterforretrocavalureterandreviewofliterature