Cargando…

Comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging

Cherenkov emission generated in tissue during radiotherapy can be harnessed for the imaging biochemistry of tissue microenvironments. Cherenkov-excited luminescence scanned imaging (CELSI) provides a way to optically and noninvasively map oxygen-related signals, which is known to correlate to outcom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shell, Jennifer R., LaRochelle, Ethan P., Bruza, Petr, Gunn, Jason R., Jarvis, Lesley A., Gladstone, David J., Pogue, Brian W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.036001
_version_ 1783399495597293568
author Shell, Jennifer R.
LaRochelle, Ethan P.
Bruza, Petr
Gunn, Jason R.
Jarvis, Lesley A.
Gladstone, David J.
Pogue, Brian W.
author_facet Shell, Jennifer R.
LaRochelle, Ethan P.
Bruza, Petr
Gunn, Jason R.
Jarvis, Lesley A.
Gladstone, David J.
Pogue, Brian W.
author_sort Shell, Jennifer R.
collection PubMed
description Cherenkov emission generated in tissue during radiotherapy can be harnessed for the imaging biochemistry of tissue microenvironments. Cherenkov-excited luminescence scanned imaging (CELSI) provides a way to optically and noninvasively map oxygen-related signals, which is known to correlate to outcomes in radiotherapy. Four candidate phosphorescent reagents PtG4, MM2, [Formula: see text] , and MitoID were studied for oxygen sensing, testing in a progressive series of (a) in solution, (b) in vitro, and (c) in subcutaneous tumors. In each test, the signal strength and response to oxygen were assessed by phosphorescence intensity and decay lifetime measurement. MM2 showed the most robust response to oxygen changes in solution, followed by PtG4, [Formula: see text] , and MitoID. However, in PANC-1 cells, their oxygen responses differed with [Formula: see text] exhibiting the largest phosphorescent intensity change in response to changes in oxygenation, followed by PtG4, MM2, and MitoID. In vivo, it was only possible to utilize [Formula: see text] and PtG4, with each being used at nanomole levels, to determine signal strength, lifetime, and [Formula: see text]. Oxygen sensing with CELSI during radiotherapy is feasible and can estimate values from 1 mm regions of tissue when used in the configuration of this study. PtG4 was the most amenable to in vivo sensing on the timescale of external beam LINAC x-rays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6397946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63979462020-01-22 Comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging Shell, Jennifer R. LaRochelle, Ethan P. Bruza, Petr Gunn, Jason R. Jarvis, Lesley A. Gladstone, David J. Pogue, Brian W. J Biomed Opt Imaging Cherenkov emission generated in tissue during radiotherapy can be harnessed for the imaging biochemistry of tissue microenvironments. Cherenkov-excited luminescence scanned imaging (CELSI) provides a way to optically and noninvasively map oxygen-related signals, which is known to correlate to outcomes in radiotherapy. Four candidate phosphorescent reagents PtG4, MM2, [Formula: see text] , and MitoID were studied for oxygen sensing, testing in a progressive series of (a) in solution, (b) in vitro, and (c) in subcutaneous tumors. In each test, the signal strength and response to oxygen were assessed by phosphorescence intensity and decay lifetime measurement. MM2 showed the most robust response to oxygen changes in solution, followed by PtG4, [Formula: see text] , and MitoID. However, in PANC-1 cells, their oxygen responses differed with [Formula: see text] exhibiting the largest phosphorescent intensity change in response to changes in oxygenation, followed by PtG4, MM2, and MitoID. In vivo, it was only possible to utilize [Formula: see text] and PtG4, with each being used at nanomole levels, to determine signal strength, lifetime, and [Formula: see text]. Oxygen sensing with CELSI during radiotherapy is feasible and can estimate values from 1 mm regions of tissue when used in the configuration of this study. PtG4 was the most amenable to in vivo sensing on the timescale of external beam LINAC x-rays. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2019-03-04 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6397946/ /pubmed/30834723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.036001 Text en © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Imaging
Shell, Jennifer R.
LaRochelle, Ethan P.
Bruza, Petr
Gunn, Jason R.
Jarvis, Lesley A.
Gladstone, David J.
Pogue, Brian W.
Comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging
title Comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging
title_full Comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging
title_fullStr Comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging
title_short Comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via Cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging
title_sort comparison of phosphorescent agents for noninvasive sensing of tumor oxygenation via cherenkov-excited luminescence imaging
topic Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6397946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.036001
work_keys_str_mv AT shelljenniferr comparisonofphosphorescentagentsfornoninvasivesensingoftumoroxygenationviacherenkovexcitedluminescenceimaging
AT larochelleethanp comparisonofphosphorescentagentsfornoninvasivesensingoftumoroxygenationviacherenkovexcitedluminescenceimaging
AT bruzapetr comparisonofphosphorescentagentsfornoninvasivesensingoftumoroxygenationviacherenkovexcitedluminescenceimaging
AT gunnjasonr comparisonofphosphorescentagentsfornoninvasivesensingoftumoroxygenationviacherenkovexcitedluminescenceimaging
AT jarvislesleya comparisonofphosphorescentagentsfornoninvasivesensingoftumoroxygenationviacherenkovexcitedluminescenceimaging
AT gladstonedavidj comparisonofphosphorescentagentsfornoninvasivesensingoftumoroxygenationviacherenkovexcitedluminescenceimaging
AT poguebrianw comparisonofphosphorescentagentsfornoninvasivesensingoftumoroxygenationviacherenkovexcitedluminescenceimaging