Cargando…

Muscle Atrophy Marker Expression Differs between Rotary Cell Culture System and Animal Studies

Muscular atrophy, defined as the loss of muscle tissue, is a serious issue for immobilized patients on Earth and for humans during spaceflight, where microgravity prevents normal muscle loading. In vitro modeling is an important step in understanding atrophy mechanisms and testing countermeasures be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harding, Charles P., Vargis, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30906768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2042808
_version_ 1783399521143750656
author Harding, Charles P.
Vargis, Elizabeth
author_facet Harding, Charles P.
Vargis, Elizabeth
author_sort Harding, Charles P.
collection PubMed
description Muscular atrophy, defined as the loss of muscle tissue, is a serious issue for immobilized patients on Earth and for humans during spaceflight, where microgravity prevents normal muscle loading. In vitro modeling is an important step in understanding atrophy mechanisms and testing countermeasures before animal trials. The most ideal environment for modeling must be empirically determined to best mimic known responses in vivo. To simulate microgravity conditions, murine C2C12 myoblasts were cultured in a rotary cell culture system (RCCS). Alginate encapsulation was compared against polystyrene microcarrier beads as a substrate for culturing these adherent muscle cells. Changes after culture under simulated microgravity were characterized by assessing mRNA expression of MuRF1, MAFbx, Caspase 3, Akt2, mTOR, Ankrd1, and Foxo3. Protein concentration of myosin heavy chain 4 (Myh4) was used as a differentiation marker. Cell morphology and substrate structure were evaluated with brightfield and fluorescent imaging. Differentiated C2C12 cells encapsulated in alginate had a significant increase in MuRF1 only following simulated microgravity culture and were morphologically dissimilar to normal cultured muscle tissue. On the other hand, C2C12 cells cultured on polystyrene microcarriers had significantly increased expression of MuRF1, Caspase 3, and Foxo3 and easily identifiable multinucleated myotubes. The extent of differentiation was higher in simulated microgravity and protein synthesis more active with increased Myh4, Akt2, and mTOR. The in vitro microcarrier model described herein significantly increases expression of several of the same atrophy markers as in vivo models. However, unlike animal models, MAFbx and Ankrd1 were not significantly increased and the fold change in MuRF1 and Foxo3 was lower than expected. Using a standard commercially available RCCS, the substrates and culture methods described only partially model changes in mRNAs associated with atrophy in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63980682019-03-24 Muscle Atrophy Marker Expression Differs between Rotary Cell Culture System and Animal Studies Harding, Charles P. Vargis, Elizabeth Biomed Res Int Research Article Muscular atrophy, defined as the loss of muscle tissue, is a serious issue for immobilized patients on Earth and for humans during spaceflight, where microgravity prevents normal muscle loading. In vitro modeling is an important step in understanding atrophy mechanisms and testing countermeasures before animal trials. The most ideal environment for modeling must be empirically determined to best mimic known responses in vivo. To simulate microgravity conditions, murine C2C12 myoblasts were cultured in a rotary cell culture system (RCCS). Alginate encapsulation was compared against polystyrene microcarrier beads as a substrate for culturing these adherent muscle cells. Changes after culture under simulated microgravity were characterized by assessing mRNA expression of MuRF1, MAFbx, Caspase 3, Akt2, mTOR, Ankrd1, and Foxo3. Protein concentration of myosin heavy chain 4 (Myh4) was used as a differentiation marker. Cell morphology and substrate structure were evaluated with brightfield and fluorescent imaging. Differentiated C2C12 cells encapsulated in alginate had a significant increase in MuRF1 only following simulated microgravity culture and were morphologically dissimilar to normal cultured muscle tissue. On the other hand, C2C12 cells cultured on polystyrene microcarriers had significantly increased expression of MuRF1, Caspase 3, and Foxo3 and easily identifiable multinucleated myotubes. The extent of differentiation was higher in simulated microgravity and protein synthesis more active with increased Myh4, Akt2, and mTOR. The in vitro microcarrier model described herein significantly increases expression of several of the same atrophy markers as in vivo models. However, unlike animal models, MAFbx and Ankrd1 were not significantly increased and the fold change in MuRF1 and Foxo3 was lower than expected. Using a standard commercially available RCCS, the substrates and culture methods described only partially model changes in mRNAs associated with atrophy in vivo. Hindawi 2019-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6398068/ /pubmed/30906768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2042808 Text en Copyright © 2019 Charles P. Harding and Elizabeth Vargis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harding, Charles P.
Vargis, Elizabeth
Muscle Atrophy Marker Expression Differs between Rotary Cell Culture System and Animal Studies
title Muscle Atrophy Marker Expression Differs between Rotary Cell Culture System and Animal Studies
title_full Muscle Atrophy Marker Expression Differs between Rotary Cell Culture System and Animal Studies
title_fullStr Muscle Atrophy Marker Expression Differs between Rotary Cell Culture System and Animal Studies
title_full_unstemmed Muscle Atrophy Marker Expression Differs between Rotary Cell Culture System and Animal Studies
title_short Muscle Atrophy Marker Expression Differs between Rotary Cell Culture System and Animal Studies
title_sort muscle atrophy marker expression differs between rotary cell culture system and animal studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30906768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2042808
work_keys_str_mv AT hardingcharlesp muscleatrophymarkerexpressiondiffersbetweenrotarycellculturesystemandanimalstudies
AT vargiselizabeth muscleatrophymarkerexpressiondiffersbetweenrotarycellculturesystemandanimalstudies