Cargando…

The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Stillbirth rates in the United Kingdom (UK) are amongst the highest of all developed nations. The association between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) foetuses and stillbirth is well established, and observational studies suggest that improved antenatal detection of SGA babies may halve t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vieira, Matias C., Relph, Sophie, Copas, Andrew, Healey, Andrew, Coxon, Kirstie, Alagna, Alessandro, Briley, Annette, Johnson, Mark, Lawlor, Deborah A., Lees, Christoph, Marlow, Neil, McCowan, Lesley, Page, Louise, Peebles, Donald, Shennan, Andrew, Thilaganathan, Baskaran, Khalil, Asma, Sandall, Jane, Pasupathy, Dharmintra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6
_version_ 1783399551012438016
author Vieira, Matias C.
Relph, Sophie
Copas, Andrew
Healey, Andrew
Coxon, Kirstie
Alagna, Alessandro
Briley, Annette
Johnson, Mark
Lawlor, Deborah A.
Lees, Christoph
Marlow, Neil
McCowan, Lesley
Page, Louise
Peebles, Donald
Shennan, Andrew
Thilaganathan, Baskaran
Khalil, Asma
Sandall, Jane
Pasupathy, Dharmintra
author_facet Vieira, Matias C.
Relph, Sophie
Copas, Andrew
Healey, Andrew
Coxon, Kirstie
Alagna, Alessandro
Briley, Annette
Johnson, Mark
Lawlor, Deborah A.
Lees, Christoph
Marlow, Neil
McCowan, Lesley
Page, Louise
Peebles, Donald
Shennan, Andrew
Thilaganathan, Baskaran
Khalil, Asma
Sandall, Jane
Pasupathy, Dharmintra
author_sort Vieira, Matias C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stillbirth rates in the United Kingdom (UK) are amongst the highest of all developed nations. The association between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) foetuses and stillbirth is well established, and observational studies suggest that improved antenatal detection of SGA babies may halve the stillbirth rate. The Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP) describes a complex intervention that includes risk assessment for SGA and screening using customised fundal-height growth charts. Increased detection of SGA from the use of GAP has been implicated in the reduction of stillbirth rates by 22%, in observational studies of UK regions where GAP uptake was high. This study will be the first randomised controlled trial examining the clinical efficacy, health economics and implementation of the GAP programme in the antenatal detection of SGA. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomised controlled trial, clusters comprising a maternity unit (or National Health Service Trust) were randomised to either implementation of the GAP programme, or standard care. The primary outcome is the rate of antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA in infants found to be SGA at birth by both population and customised standards, as this is recognised as being the group with highest risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes include antenatal detection of SGA by population centiles, antenatal detection of SGA by customised centiles, short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes, resource use and economic consequences, and a process evaluation of GAP implementation. Qualitative interviews will be performed to assess facilitators and barriers to implementation of GAP. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to provide data and outcomes from a randomised controlled trial investigating the potential difference between the GAP programme compared to standard care for antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA infants. Accurate information on the performance and service provision requirements of the GAP protocol has the potential to inform national policy decisions on methods to reduce the rate of stillbirth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Primary registry and trial identifying number: ISRCTN 67698474. Registered on 2 November 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63982572019-03-13 The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Vieira, Matias C. Relph, Sophie Copas, Andrew Healey, Andrew Coxon, Kirstie Alagna, Alessandro Briley, Annette Johnson, Mark Lawlor, Deborah A. Lees, Christoph Marlow, Neil McCowan, Lesley Page, Louise Peebles, Donald Shennan, Andrew Thilaganathan, Baskaran Khalil, Asma Sandall, Jane Pasupathy, Dharmintra Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Stillbirth rates in the United Kingdom (UK) are amongst the highest of all developed nations. The association between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) foetuses and stillbirth is well established, and observational studies suggest that improved antenatal detection of SGA babies may halve the stillbirth rate. The Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP) describes a complex intervention that includes risk assessment for SGA and screening using customised fundal-height growth charts. Increased detection of SGA from the use of GAP has been implicated in the reduction of stillbirth rates by 22%, in observational studies of UK regions where GAP uptake was high. This study will be the first randomised controlled trial examining the clinical efficacy, health economics and implementation of the GAP programme in the antenatal detection of SGA. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomised controlled trial, clusters comprising a maternity unit (or National Health Service Trust) were randomised to either implementation of the GAP programme, or standard care. The primary outcome is the rate of antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA in infants found to be SGA at birth by both population and customised standards, as this is recognised as being the group with highest risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes include antenatal detection of SGA by population centiles, antenatal detection of SGA by customised centiles, short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes, resource use and economic consequences, and a process evaluation of GAP implementation. Qualitative interviews will be performed to assess facilitators and barriers to implementation of GAP. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to provide data and outcomes from a randomised controlled trial investigating the potential difference between the GAP programme compared to standard care for antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA infants. Accurate information on the performance and service provision requirements of the GAP protocol has the potential to inform national policy decisions on methods to reduce the rate of stillbirth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Primary registry and trial identifying number: ISRCTN 67698474. Registered on 2 November 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6398257/ /pubmed/30832739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Vieira, Matias C.
Relph, Sophie
Copas, Andrew
Healey, Andrew
Coxon, Kirstie
Alagna, Alessandro
Briley, Annette
Johnson, Mark
Lawlor, Deborah A.
Lees, Christoph
Marlow, Neil
McCowan, Lesley
Page, Louise
Peebles, Donald
Shennan, Andrew
Thilaganathan, Baskaran
Khalil, Asma
Sandall, Jane
Pasupathy, Dharmintra
The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort design trial (detection of small for gestational age neonate), evaluating the effect of the growth assessment protocol (gap): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vieiramatiasc thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT relphsophie thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT copasandrew thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT healeyandrew thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coxonkirstie thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alagnaalessandro thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brileyannette thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT johnsonmark thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lawlordeboraha thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leeschristoph thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marlowneil thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccowanlesley thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pagelouise thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT peeblesdonald thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shennanandrew thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thilaganathanbaskaran thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT khalilasma thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sandalljane thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pasupathydharmintra thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vieiramatiasc designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT relphsophie designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT copasandrew designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT healeyandrew designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coxonkirstie designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alagnaalessandro designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brileyannette designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT johnsonmark designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lawlordeboraha designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leeschristoph designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marlowneil designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccowanlesley designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pagelouise designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT peeblesdonald designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shennanandrew designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thilaganathanbaskaran designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT khalilasma designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sandalljane designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pasupathydharmintra designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial