Cargando…
The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Stillbirth rates in the United Kingdom (UK) are amongst the highest of all developed nations. The association between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) foetuses and stillbirth is well established, and observational studies suggest that improved antenatal detection of SGA babies may halve t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6 |
_version_ | 1783399551012438016 |
---|---|
author | Vieira, Matias C. Relph, Sophie Copas, Andrew Healey, Andrew Coxon, Kirstie Alagna, Alessandro Briley, Annette Johnson, Mark Lawlor, Deborah A. Lees, Christoph Marlow, Neil McCowan, Lesley Page, Louise Peebles, Donald Shennan, Andrew Thilaganathan, Baskaran Khalil, Asma Sandall, Jane Pasupathy, Dharmintra |
author_facet | Vieira, Matias C. Relph, Sophie Copas, Andrew Healey, Andrew Coxon, Kirstie Alagna, Alessandro Briley, Annette Johnson, Mark Lawlor, Deborah A. Lees, Christoph Marlow, Neil McCowan, Lesley Page, Louise Peebles, Donald Shennan, Andrew Thilaganathan, Baskaran Khalil, Asma Sandall, Jane Pasupathy, Dharmintra |
author_sort | Vieira, Matias C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stillbirth rates in the United Kingdom (UK) are amongst the highest of all developed nations. The association between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) foetuses and stillbirth is well established, and observational studies suggest that improved antenatal detection of SGA babies may halve the stillbirth rate. The Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP) describes a complex intervention that includes risk assessment for SGA and screening using customised fundal-height growth charts. Increased detection of SGA from the use of GAP has been implicated in the reduction of stillbirth rates by 22%, in observational studies of UK regions where GAP uptake was high. This study will be the first randomised controlled trial examining the clinical efficacy, health economics and implementation of the GAP programme in the antenatal detection of SGA. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomised controlled trial, clusters comprising a maternity unit (or National Health Service Trust) were randomised to either implementation of the GAP programme, or standard care. The primary outcome is the rate of antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA in infants found to be SGA at birth by both population and customised standards, as this is recognised as being the group with highest risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes include antenatal detection of SGA by population centiles, antenatal detection of SGA by customised centiles, short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes, resource use and economic consequences, and a process evaluation of GAP implementation. Qualitative interviews will be performed to assess facilitators and barriers to implementation of GAP. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to provide data and outcomes from a randomised controlled trial investigating the potential difference between the GAP programme compared to standard care for antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA infants. Accurate information on the performance and service provision requirements of the GAP protocol has the potential to inform national policy decisions on methods to reduce the rate of stillbirth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Primary registry and trial identifying number: ISRCTN 67698474. Registered on 2 November 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6398257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63982572019-03-13 The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Vieira, Matias C. Relph, Sophie Copas, Andrew Healey, Andrew Coxon, Kirstie Alagna, Alessandro Briley, Annette Johnson, Mark Lawlor, Deborah A. Lees, Christoph Marlow, Neil McCowan, Lesley Page, Louise Peebles, Donald Shennan, Andrew Thilaganathan, Baskaran Khalil, Asma Sandall, Jane Pasupathy, Dharmintra Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Stillbirth rates in the United Kingdom (UK) are amongst the highest of all developed nations. The association between small-for-gestational-age (SGA) foetuses and stillbirth is well established, and observational studies suggest that improved antenatal detection of SGA babies may halve the stillbirth rate. The Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP) describes a complex intervention that includes risk assessment for SGA and screening using customised fundal-height growth charts. Increased detection of SGA from the use of GAP has been implicated in the reduction of stillbirth rates by 22%, in observational studies of UK regions where GAP uptake was high. This study will be the first randomised controlled trial examining the clinical efficacy, health economics and implementation of the GAP programme in the antenatal detection of SGA. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomised controlled trial, clusters comprising a maternity unit (or National Health Service Trust) were randomised to either implementation of the GAP programme, or standard care. The primary outcome is the rate of antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA in infants found to be SGA at birth by both population and customised standards, as this is recognised as being the group with highest risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes include antenatal detection of SGA by population centiles, antenatal detection of SGA by customised centiles, short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes, resource use and economic consequences, and a process evaluation of GAP implementation. Qualitative interviews will be performed to assess facilitators and barriers to implementation of GAP. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to provide data and outcomes from a randomised controlled trial investigating the potential difference between the GAP programme compared to standard care for antenatal ultrasound detection of SGA infants. Accurate information on the performance and service provision requirements of the GAP protocol has the potential to inform national policy decisions on methods to reduce the rate of stillbirth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Primary registry and trial identifying number: ISRCTN 67698474. Registered on 2 November 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6398257/ /pubmed/30832739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Vieira, Matias C. Relph, Sophie Copas, Andrew Healey, Andrew Coxon, Kirstie Alagna, Alessandro Briley, Annette Johnson, Mark Lawlor, Deborah A. Lees, Christoph Marlow, Neil McCowan, Lesley Page, Louise Peebles, Donald Shennan, Andrew Thilaganathan, Baskaran Khalil, Asma Sandall, Jane Pasupathy, Dharmintra The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | design trial (detection of small for gestational age neonate), evaluating the effect of the growth assessment protocol (gap): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vieiramatiasc thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT relphsophie thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT copasandrew thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT healeyandrew thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT coxonkirstie thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT alagnaalessandro thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brileyannette thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT johnsonmark thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lawlordeboraha thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leeschristoph thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marlowneil thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccowanlesley thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pagelouise thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT peeblesdonald thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shennanandrew thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thilaganathanbaskaran thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT khalilasma thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sandalljane thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pasupathydharmintra thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thedesigntrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vieiramatiasc designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT relphsophie designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT copasandrew designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT healeyandrew designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT coxonkirstie designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT alagnaalessandro designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brileyannette designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT johnsonmark designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lawlordeboraha designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leeschristoph designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marlowneil designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccowanlesley designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pagelouise designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT peeblesdonald designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shennanandrew designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thilaganathanbaskaran designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT khalilasma designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sandalljane designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pasupathydharmintra designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT designtrialdetectionofsmallforgestationalageneonateevaluatingtheeffectofthegrowthassessmentprotocolgapstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |