Cargando…
Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit
BACKGROUND: Central Line-Associated BloodStream Infections (CLABSIs) are emerging challenge in Respiratory semi-Intensive Care Units (RICUs). We evaluated efficacy of educational interventions on rate of CLABSIs and effects of port protector as adjuvant tool. METHODS: Study lasted 18 months (9 month...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3848-z |
_version_ | 1783399551727566848 |
---|---|
author | Inchingolo, Riccardo Pasciuto, Giuliana Magnini, Daniele Cavalletti, Manuela Scoppettuolo, Giancarlo Montemurro, Giuliano Smargiassi, Andrea Torelli, Riccardo Sanguinetti, Maurizio Spanu, Teresa Corbo, Giuseppe Maria Richeldi, Luca |
author_facet | Inchingolo, Riccardo Pasciuto, Giuliana Magnini, Daniele Cavalletti, Manuela Scoppettuolo, Giancarlo Montemurro, Giuliano Smargiassi, Andrea Torelli, Riccardo Sanguinetti, Maurizio Spanu, Teresa Corbo, Giuseppe Maria Richeldi, Luca |
author_sort | Inchingolo, Riccardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Central Line-Associated BloodStream Infections (CLABSIs) are emerging challenge in Respiratory semi-Intensive Care Units (RICUs). We evaluated efficacy of educational interventions on rate of CLABSIs and effects of port protector as adjuvant tool. METHODS: Study lasted 18 months (9 months of observation and 9 of intervention). We enrolled patients with central venous catheter (CVC): 1) placed during hospitalization in RICU; 2) already placed without signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) within 48 h after the admission; 3) already placed without evidence of microbiologic contamination of blood cultures. During interventional period we randomized patients into two groups: 1) educational intervention (Group 1) and 2) educational intervention plus port protector (Group 2). We focused on CVC-related sepsis as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the rate of CVC colonization and CVC contamination. RESULTS: Eighty seven CVCs were included during observational period. CLABSIs rate was 8.4/1000 [10 sepsis (9 CLABSIs)]. We observed 17 CVC colonizations and 6 contaminations. Forty six CVCs were included during interventional period. CLABSIs rate was 1.4/1000. 21/46 CVCs were included into Group 2, in which no CLABSIs or contaminations were reported, while 2 CVC colonizations were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our study clearly shows that both kinds of interventions significantly reduce the rate of CLABSIs. In particular, the use of port protector combined to educational interventions gave zero CLABSIs rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03486093 [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier], retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6398260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63982602019-03-13 Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit Inchingolo, Riccardo Pasciuto, Giuliana Magnini, Daniele Cavalletti, Manuela Scoppettuolo, Giancarlo Montemurro, Giuliano Smargiassi, Andrea Torelli, Riccardo Sanguinetti, Maurizio Spanu, Teresa Corbo, Giuseppe Maria Richeldi, Luca BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Central Line-Associated BloodStream Infections (CLABSIs) are emerging challenge in Respiratory semi-Intensive Care Units (RICUs). We evaluated efficacy of educational interventions on rate of CLABSIs and effects of port protector as adjuvant tool. METHODS: Study lasted 18 months (9 months of observation and 9 of intervention). We enrolled patients with central venous catheter (CVC): 1) placed during hospitalization in RICU; 2) already placed without signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) within 48 h after the admission; 3) already placed without evidence of microbiologic contamination of blood cultures. During interventional period we randomized patients into two groups: 1) educational intervention (Group 1) and 2) educational intervention plus port protector (Group 2). We focused on CVC-related sepsis as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the rate of CVC colonization and CVC contamination. RESULTS: Eighty seven CVCs were included during observational period. CLABSIs rate was 8.4/1000 [10 sepsis (9 CLABSIs)]. We observed 17 CVC colonizations and 6 contaminations. Forty six CVCs were included during interventional period. CLABSIs rate was 1.4/1000. 21/46 CVCs were included into Group 2, in which no CLABSIs or contaminations were reported, while 2 CVC colonizations were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our study clearly shows that both kinds of interventions significantly reduce the rate of CLABSIs. In particular, the use of port protector combined to educational interventions gave zero CLABSIs rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03486093 [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier], retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6398260/ /pubmed/30832598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3848-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Inchingolo, Riccardo Pasciuto, Giuliana Magnini, Daniele Cavalletti, Manuela Scoppettuolo, Giancarlo Montemurro, Giuliano Smargiassi, Andrea Torelli, Riccardo Sanguinetti, Maurizio Spanu, Teresa Corbo, Giuseppe Maria Richeldi, Luca Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit |
title | Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit |
title_full | Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit |
title_fullStr | Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit |
title_full_unstemmed | Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit |
title_short | Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit |
title_sort | educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3848-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inchingoloriccardo educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT pasciutogiuliana educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT magninidaniele educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT cavallettimanuela educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT scoppettuologiancarlo educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT montemurrogiuliano educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT smargiassiandrea educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT torelliriccardo educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT sanguinettimaurizio educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT spanuteresa educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT corbogiuseppemaria educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit AT richeldiluca educationalinterventionsaloneandcombinedwithportprotectorreducetherateofcentralvenouscatheterinfectionandcolonizationinrespiratorysemiintensivecareunit |