Cargando…

The peer review process

The peer review process provides a foundation for the credibility of scientific findings in medicine. The following article discusses the history of peer review in scientific and medical journals, the process for the selection of peer reviewers, and how journal editors arrive at a decision on submit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tumin, Dmitry, Tobias, Joseph Drew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930722
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_544_18
_version_ 1783399556946329600
author Tumin, Dmitry
Tobias, Joseph Drew
author_facet Tumin, Dmitry
Tobias, Joseph Drew
author_sort Tumin, Dmitry
collection PubMed
description The peer review process provides a foundation for the credibility of scientific findings in medicine. The following article discusses the history of peer review in scientific and medical journals, the process for the selection of peer reviewers, and how journal editors arrive at a decision on submitted manuscripts. To aid authors who are invited to revise their manuscripts for further consideration, we outline steps for considering reviewer comments and provide suggestions for organizing the author's response to reviewers. We also examine ethical issues in peer review and provide recommendations for authors interested in becoming peer reviewers themselves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63982932019-04-01 The peer review process Tumin, Dmitry Tobias, Joseph Drew Saudi J Anaesth Review Article The peer review process provides a foundation for the credibility of scientific findings in medicine. The following article discusses the history of peer review in scientific and medical journals, the process for the selection of peer reviewers, and how journal editors arrive at a decision on submitted manuscripts. To aid authors who are invited to revise their manuscripts for further consideration, we outline steps for considering reviewer comments and provide suggestions for organizing the author's response to reviewers. We also examine ethical issues in peer review and provide recommendations for authors interested in becoming peer reviewers themselves. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6398293/ /pubmed/30930722 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_544_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Tumin, Dmitry
Tobias, Joseph Drew
The peer review process
title The peer review process
title_full The peer review process
title_fullStr The peer review process
title_full_unstemmed The peer review process
title_short The peer review process
title_sort peer review process
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930722
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_544_18
work_keys_str_mv AT tumindmitry thepeerreviewprocess
AT tobiasjosephdrew thepeerreviewprocess
AT tumindmitry peerreviewprocess
AT tobiasjosephdrew peerreviewprocess