Cargando…
The peer review process
The peer review process provides a foundation for the credibility of scientific findings in medicine. The following article discusses the history of peer review in scientific and medical journals, the process for the selection of peer reviewers, and how journal editors arrive at a decision on submit...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930722 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_544_18 |
_version_ | 1783399556946329600 |
---|---|
author | Tumin, Dmitry Tobias, Joseph Drew |
author_facet | Tumin, Dmitry Tobias, Joseph Drew |
author_sort | Tumin, Dmitry |
collection | PubMed |
description | The peer review process provides a foundation for the credibility of scientific findings in medicine. The following article discusses the history of peer review in scientific and medical journals, the process for the selection of peer reviewers, and how journal editors arrive at a decision on submitted manuscripts. To aid authors who are invited to revise their manuscripts for further consideration, we outline steps for considering reviewer comments and provide suggestions for organizing the author's response to reviewers. We also examine ethical issues in peer review and provide recommendations for authors interested in becoming peer reviewers themselves. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6398293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63982932019-04-01 The peer review process Tumin, Dmitry Tobias, Joseph Drew Saudi J Anaesth Review Article The peer review process provides a foundation for the credibility of scientific findings in medicine. The following article discusses the history of peer review in scientific and medical journals, the process for the selection of peer reviewers, and how journal editors arrive at a decision on submitted manuscripts. To aid authors who are invited to revise their manuscripts for further consideration, we outline steps for considering reviewer comments and provide suggestions for organizing the author's response to reviewers. We also examine ethical issues in peer review and provide recommendations for authors interested in becoming peer reviewers themselves. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6398293/ /pubmed/30930722 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_544_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Tumin, Dmitry Tobias, Joseph Drew The peer review process |
title | The peer review process |
title_full | The peer review process |
title_fullStr | The peer review process |
title_full_unstemmed | The peer review process |
title_short | The peer review process |
title_sort | peer review process |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930722 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_544_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tumindmitry thepeerreviewprocess AT tobiasjosephdrew thepeerreviewprocess AT tumindmitry peerreviewprocess AT tobiasjosephdrew peerreviewprocess |