Cargando…

Surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent Dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: There is no definitive cure for Dupuytren disease (DD), and recurrence of finger contractures after treatment is common. Surgical fasciectomy is considered the standard treatment method for recurrence, although associated with a high incidence of complications. Collagenase injection, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordenskjöld, Jesper, Lauritzson, Anna, Waldén, Markus, Kopylov, Philippe, Atroshi, Isam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024424
_version_ 1783399608475451392
author Nordenskjöld, Jesper
Lauritzson, Anna
Waldén, Markus
Kopylov, Philippe
Atroshi, Isam
author_facet Nordenskjöld, Jesper
Lauritzson, Anna
Waldén, Markus
Kopylov, Philippe
Atroshi, Isam
author_sort Nordenskjöld, Jesper
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is no definitive cure for Dupuytren disease (DD), and recurrence of finger contractures after treatment is common. Surgical fasciectomy is considered the standard treatment method for recurrence, although associated with a high incidence of complications. Collagenase injection, a non-surgical treatment option, has been shown to be a safe and effective method; however, most studies regarding collagenase have involved first-time treatment. Collagenase efficacy in patients with recurrent DD beyond the immediate effect has not yet been determined. The aim of our study is to compare surgical fasciectomy and collagenase injection in treating recurrent DD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Inclusion criteria are recurrence of DD in one or more fingers after previous treatment with fasciectomy or collagenase injection, a passive extension deficit ≥30° in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and/or proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, and a palpable cord causing the recurrent contracture. A total of 56 patients will be randomised to either surgical fasciectomy or collagenase injection. A hand therapist blinded to patients’ group allocation will measure range of motion at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months. The primary outcomes are the total active extension deficit (MCP plus PIP) at 3 months and the proportion of patients with contracture worsening ≥20° in the treated finger joint at 2 years compared with 3 months. The secondary outcomes include changes in total active motion, active and passive extension deficit from baseline up to 5 years, scores on patient-reported outcome measures, adverse events and costs of treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Regional Ethical Review Board, Lund University, Sweden(2017/623). The trial will be conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 2000. The results of the trial will be disseminated as published articles in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03406338; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63986192019-03-20 Surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent Dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial Nordenskjöld, Jesper Lauritzson, Anna Waldén, Markus Kopylov, Philippe Atroshi, Isam BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: There is no definitive cure for Dupuytren disease (DD), and recurrence of finger contractures after treatment is common. Surgical fasciectomy is considered the standard treatment method for recurrence, although associated with a high incidence of complications. Collagenase injection, a non-surgical treatment option, has been shown to be a safe and effective method; however, most studies regarding collagenase have involved first-time treatment. Collagenase efficacy in patients with recurrent DD beyond the immediate effect has not yet been determined. The aim of our study is to compare surgical fasciectomy and collagenase injection in treating recurrent DD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Inclusion criteria are recurrence of DD in one or more fingers after previous treatment with fasciectomy or collagenase injection, a passive extension deficit ≥30° in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and/or proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, and a palpable cord causing the recurrent contracture. A total of 56 patients will be randomised to either surgical fasciectomy or collagenase injection. A hand therapist blinded to patients’ group allocation will measure range of motion at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months. The primary outcomes are the total active extension deficit (MCP plus PIP) at 3 months and the proportion of patients with contracture worsening ≥20° in the treated finger joint at 2 years compared with 3 months. The secondary outcomes include changes in total active motion, active and passive extension deficit from baseline up to 5 years, scores on patient-reported outcome measures, adverse events and costs of treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Regional Ethical Review Board, Lund University, Sweden(2017/623). The trial will be conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 2000. The results of the trial will be disseminated as published articles in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03406338; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6398619/ /pubmed/30808670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024424 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Nordenskjöld, Jesper
Lauritzson, Anna
Waldén, Markus
Kopylov, Philippe
Atroshi, Isam
Surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent Dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title Surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent Dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent Dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent Dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent Dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent Dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024424
work_keys_str_mv AT nordenskjoldjesper surgicalfasciectomyversuscollagenaseinjectionintreatingrecurrentdupuytrendiseasestudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lauritzsonanna surgicalfasciectomyversuscollagenaseinjectionintreatingrecurrentdupuytrendiseasestudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT waldenmarkus surgicalfasciectomyversuscollagenaseinjectionintreatingrecurrentdupuytrendiseasestudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kopylovphilippe surgicalfasciectomyversuscollagenaseinjectionintreatingrecurrentdupuytrendiseasestudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT atroshiisam surgicalfasciectomyversuscollagenaseinjectionintreatingrecurrentdupuytrendiseasestudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial