Cargando…

Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Stem cell research (SCR) and the biomedical potential of developing therapies are crucial topics in biomedicine. Like other biotechnologies, stem cells are context specific entities understood through local conceptualisations of culture, politics, nationhood, as well as their perceived...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, Malissa Kay, Babovič, Mojca, Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025801
_version_ 1783399610563166208
author Shaw, Malissa Kay
Babovič, Mojca
Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie
author_facet Shaw, Malissa Kay
Babovič, Mojca
Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie
author_sort Shaw, Malissa Kay
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Stem cell research (SCR) and the biomedical potential of developing therapies are crucial topics in biomedicine. Like other biotechnologies, stem cells are context specific entities understood through local conceptualisations of culture, politics, nationhood, as well as their perceived therapeutic efficacy. There is a need to recognise how these developments are understood within the healthcare community and by those who may use them. This protocol describes a systematic literature review that aims to explore healthcare professionals’, healthcare students’, patients’, and donors’ perceptions of SCR and therapy (SCR/T) and the factors that influence their perceptions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines a systematic review will be undertaken. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline+Journals @Ovid and Ariti Library will be systematically searched for studies on healthcare professionals’, healthcare students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of SCR and developing therapies. All articles will be screened by a researcher for inclusion and evaluation based on 12 criteria for evaluating qualitative research. At least 20% of articles will also be reviewed by a second researcher and any disagreement will be solved via consensus. Data extracted from the articles will be analysed using thematic synthesis enabling the identification of concepts across studies and the development of new theory. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As part of a larger research project, ethical approval has been provided by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. This review will be able to determine the impact that certain perceptions of SCR/T will have on the development of future medical knowledge and practice. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018103627.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63986282019-03-20 Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol Shaw, Malissa Kay Babovič, Mojca Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie BMJ Open Sociology INTRODUCTION: Stem cell research (SCR) and the biomedical potential of developing therapies are crucial topics in biomedicine. Like other biotechnologies, stem cells are context specific entities understood through local conceptualisations of culture, politics, nationhood, as well as their perceived therapeutic efficacy. There is a need to recognise how these developments are understood within the healthcare community and by those who may use them. This protocol describes a systematic literature review that aims to explore healthcare professionals’, healthcare students’, patients’, and donors’ perceptions of SCR and therapy (SCR/T) and the factors that influence their perceptions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines a systematic review will be undertaken. Web of Science, Scopus, Medline+Journals @Ovid and Ariti Library will be systematically searched for studies on healthcare professionals’, healthcare students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of SCR and developing therapies. All articles will be screened by a researcher for inclusion and evaluation based on 12 criteria for evaluating qualitative research. At least 20% of articles will also be reviewed by a second researcher and any disagreement will be solved via consensus. Data extracted from the articles will be analysed using thematic synthesis enabling the identification of concepts across studies and the development of new theory. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As part of a larger research project, ethical approval has been provided by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. This review will be able to determine the impact that certain perceptions of SCR/T will have on the development of future medical knowledge and practice. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018103627. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6398628/ /pubmed/30798317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025801 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Sociology
Shaw, Malissa Kay
Babovič, Mojca
Monrouxe, Lynn Valerie
Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol
title Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol
title_full Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol
title_short Healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol
title_sort healthcare professionals’, students’, patients’ and donors’ perceptions of stem cell research and therapy: a systematic review protocol
topic Sociology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025801
work_keys_str_mv AT shawmalissakay healthcareprofessionalsstudentspatientsanddonorsperceptionsofstemcellresearchandtherapyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT babovicmojca healthcareprofessionalsstudentspatientsanddonorsperceptionsofstemcellresearchandtherapyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT monrouxelynnvalerie healthcareprofessionalsstudentspatientsanddonorsperceptionsofstemcellresearchandtherapyasystematicreviewprotocol