Cargando…
Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry
OBJECTIVES: Increased morbidity and mortality have been associated with weekend and night-time clinical activity. We sought to compare the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) between weekdays and weekends or night-time and day-time to determine if ‘out-of-hours’ LT has acceptable results compared...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024917 |
_version_ | 1783399613376495616 |
---|---|
author | Halliday, Neil Martin, Kate Collett, David Allen, Elisa Thorburn, Douglas |
author_facet | Halliday, Neil Martin, Kate Collett, David Allen, Elisa Thorburn, Douglas |
author_sort | Halliday, Neil |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Increased morbidity and mortality have been associated with weekend and night-time clinical activity. We sought to compare the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) between weekdays and weekends or night-time and day-time to determine if ‘out-of-hours’ LT has acceptable results compared with ‘in-hours’. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient outcomes for all 8816 adult, liver-only transplants (2000–2014) from the UK Transplant Registry. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were graft failure (loss of the graft with or without death) and transplant failure (either graft failure or death with a functioning graft) at 30 days, 1 year and 3 years post-transplantation. The association of these outcomes with weekend versus weekday and day versus night transplantation were explored, following the construction of a risk-adjusted Cox regression model. RESULTS: Similar patient and donor characteristics were observed between weekend and weekday transplantation. Unadjusted graft failure estimates were 5.7% at 30 days, 10.4% at 1 year and 14.6% at 3 years; transplant failure estimates were 7.9%, 15.3% and 21.3% respectively. A risk-adjusted Cox regression model demonstrated a significantly lower adjusted HR (95% CI) of transplant failure for weekend transplant of 0.77 (0.66 to 0.91) within 30 days, 0.86 (0.77 to 0.97) within 1 year, 0.89 (0.81 to 0.99) within 3 years and for graft failure of 0.81 (0.67 to 0.97) within 30 days. For patients without transplant failure within 30 days, there was no weekend effect on transplant failure. Neither night-time procurement nor transplantation were associated with an increased hazard of transplant or graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend and night-time LT outcomes were non-inferior to weekday or day-time transplantation, and we observed a possible small beneficial effect of weekend transplantation. The structure of LT services in the UK delivers acceptable outcomes ‘out-of-hours’ and may offer wider lessons for weekend working structures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6398642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63986422019-03-20 Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry Halliday, Neil Martin, Kate Collett, David Allen, Elisa Thorburn, Douglas BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVES: Increased morbidity and mortality have been associated with weekend and night-time clinical activity. We sought to compare the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) between weekdays and weekends or night-time and day-time to determine if ‘out-of-hours’ LT has acceptable results compared with ‘in-hours’. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient outcomes for all 8816 adult, liver-only transplants (2000–2014) from the UK Transplant Registry. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were graft failure (loss of the graft with or without death) and transplant failure (either graft failure or death with a functioning graft) at 30 days, 1 year and 3 years post-transplantation. The association of these outcomes with weekend versus weekday and day versus night transplantation were explored, following the construction of a risk-adjusted Cox regression model. RESULTS: Similar patient and donor characteristics were observed between weekend and weekday transplantation. Unadjusted graft failure estimates were 5.7% at 30 days, 10.4% at 1 year and 14.6% at 3 years; transplant failure estimates were 7.9%, 15.3% and 21.3% respectively. A risk-adjusted Cox regression model demonstrated a significantly lower adjusted HR (95% CI) of transplant failure for weekend transplant of 0.77 (0.66 to 0.91) within 30 days, 0.86 (0.77 to 0.97) within 1 year, 0.89 (0.81 to 0.99) within 3 years and for graft failure of 0.81 (0.67 to 0.97) within 30 days. For patients without transplant failure within 30 days, there was no weekend effect on transplant failure. Neither night-time procurement nor transplantation were associated with an increased hazard of transplant or graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend and night-time LT outcomes were non-inferior to weekday or day-time transplantation, and we observed a possible small beneficial effect of weekend transplantation. The structure of LT services in the UK delivers acceptable outcomes ‘out-of-hours’ and may offer wider lessons for weekend working structures. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6398642/ /pubmed/30787089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024917 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology and Hepatology Halliday, Neil Martin, Kate Collett, David Allen, Elisa Thorburn, Douglas Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry |
title | Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry |
title_full | Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry |
title_fullStr | Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry |
title_short | Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry |
title_sort | is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? a retrospective analysis of the uk transplant registry |
topic | Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hallidayneil islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry AT martinkate islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry AT collettdavid islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry AT allenelisa islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry AT thorburndouglas islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry |