Cargando…

Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry

OBJECTIVES: Increased morbidity and mortality have been associated with weekend and night-time clinical activity. We sought to compare the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) between weekdays and weekends or night-time and day-time to determine if ‘out-of-hours’ LT has acceptable results compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halliday, Neil, Martin, Kate, Collett, David, Allen, Elisa, Thorburn, Douglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024917
_version_ 1783399613376495616
author Halliday, Neil
Martin, Kate
Collett, David
Allen, Elisa
Thorburn, Douglas
author_facet Halliday, Neil
Martin, Kate
Collett, David
Allen, Elisa
Thorburn, Douglas
author_sort Halliday, Neil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Increased morbidity and mortality have been associated with weekend and night-time clinical activity. We sought to compare the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) between weekdays and weekends or night-time and day-time to determine if ‘out-of-hours’ LT has acceptable results compared with ‘in-hours’. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient outcomes for all 8816 adult, liver-only transplants (2000–2014) from the UK Transplant Registry. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were graft failure (loss of the graft with or without death) and transplant failure (either graft failure or death with a functioning graft) at 30 days, 1 year and 3 years post-transplantation. The association of these outcomes with weekend versus weekday and day versus night transplantation were explored, following the construction of a risk-adjusted Cox regression model. RESULTS: Similar patient and donor characteristics were observed between weekend and weekday transplantation. Unadjusted graft failure estimates were 5.7% at 30 days, 10.4% at 1 year and 14.6% at 3 years; transplant failure estimates were 7.9%, 15.3% and 21.3% respectively. A risk-adjusted Cox regression model demonstrated a significantly lower adjusted HR (95% CI) of transplant failure for weekend transplant of 0.77 (0.66 to 0.91) within 30 days, 0.86 (0.77 to 0.97) within 1 year, 0.89 (0.81 to 0.99) within 3 years and for graft failure of 0.81 (0.67 to 0.97) within 30 days. For patients without transplant failure within 30 days, there was no weekend effect on transplant failure. Neither night-time procurement nor transplantation were associated with an increased hazard of transplant or graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend and night-time LT outcomes were non-inferior to weekday or day-time transplantation, and we observed a possible small beneficial effect of weekend transplantation. The structure of LT services in the UK delivers acceptable outcomes ‘out-of-hours’ and may offer wider lessons for weekend working structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63986422019-03-20 Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry Halliday, Neil Martin, Kate Collett, David Allen, Elisa Thorburn, Douglas BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVES: Increased morbidity and mortality have been associated with weekend and night-time clinical activity. We sought to compare the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) between weekdays and weekends or night-time and day-time to determine if ‘out-of-hours’ LT has acceptable results compared with ‘in-hours’. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient outcomes for all 8816 adult, liver-only transplants (2000–2014) from the UK Transplant Registry. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were graft failure (loss of the graft with or without death) and transplant failure (either graft failure or death with a functioning graft) at 30 days, 1 year and 3 years post-transplantation. The association of these outcomes with weekend versus weekday and day versus night transplantation were explored, following the construction of a risk-adjusted Cox regression model. RESULTS: Similar patient and donor characteristics were observed between weekend and weekday transplantation. Unadjusted graft failure estimates were 5.7% at 30 days, 10.4% at 1 year and 14.6% at 3 years; transplant failure estimates were 7.9%, 15.3% and 21.3% respectively. A risk-adjusted Cox regression model demonstrated a significantly lower adjusted HR (95% CI) of transplant failure for weekend transplant of 0.77 (0.66 to 0.91) within 30 days, 0.86 (0.77 to 0.97) within 1 year, 0.89 (0.81 to 0.99) within 3 years and for graft failure of 0.81 (0.67 to 0.97) within 30 days. For patients without transplant failure within 30 days, there was no weekend effect on transplant failure. Neither night-time procurement nor transplantation were associated with an increased hazard of transplant or graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend and night-time LT outcomes were non-inferior to weekday or day-time transplantation, and we observed a possible small beneficial effect of weekend transplantation. The structure of LT services in the UK delivers acceptable outcomes ‘out-of-hours’ and may offer wider lessons for weekend working structures. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6398642/ /pubmed/30787089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024917 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Halliday, Neil
Martin, Kate
Collett, David
Allen, Elisa
Thorburn, Douglas
Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry
title Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry
title_full Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry
title_fullStr Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry
title_full_unstemmed Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry
title_short Is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry
title_sort is liver transplantation ‘out-of-hours’ non-inferior to ‘in-hours’ transplantation? a retrospective analysis of the uk transplant registry
topic Gastroenterology and Hepatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024917
work_keys_str_mv AT hallidayneil islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry
AT martinkate islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry
AT collettdavid islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry
AT allenelisa islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry
AT thorburndouglas islivertransplantationoutofhoursnoninferiortoinhourstransplantationaretrospectiveanalysisoftheuktransplantregistry