Cargando…

Can a tool developed for industry be used to assess fatigue risk in medical rotas? A pilot study of foundation doctors’ rotas in a tertiary centre

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and ease of using a pre-existing health and safety executive fatigue risk calculator to assess doctors’ rotas. DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: A large tertiary-referral teaching hospital in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 95 anonymised foundation years 1 and 2 rotas in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cumber, Elspeth, Greig, Paul Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30772847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023470
_version_ 1783399614062264320
author Cumber, Elspeth
Greig, Paul Robert
author_facet Cumber, Elspeth
Greig, Paul Robert
author_sort Cumber, Elspeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and ease of using a pre-existing health and safety executive fatigue risk calculator to assess doctors’ rotas. DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: A large tertiary-referral teaching hospital in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 95 anonymised foundation years 1 and 2 rotas in General Medicine, General Surgery and Emergency Medicine covering a 4-month period. All rotas provided by rota coordinators were included and assessed. INTERVENTIONS: Rotas were assessed for two indices: relative risk of fatigue-related errors compared with a ‘2-day, two-night, four-off’ shift pattern and percentage chance of a high score on a standardised sleepiness scale. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Fatigue index (percentage chance of a high score on a standardised sleepiness scale) and risk index (relative risk of fatigue-related errors compared with a ‘2-day, two-night, four-off’ shift pattern) of all shifts on all rotas. RESULTS: Nearly half of all shifts demonstrated increased risk of fatigue-related errors and increased probability of high levels of sleepiness. There was significant interspeciality variation in both indices. These results are based on rotas as opposed to ‘work as done’ and are therefore likely to slightly universally underestimate actual fatigue risks. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study demonstrates that this tool can be used to compare rotas and guide rota design to minimise risk wherever possible. The calculator guidance clearly states there is no ‘ideal risk’ but that values should be minimised, and a maximum fatigue risk agreed which is deemed acceptable given the nature of work undertaken. This study is intended to demonstrate that fatigue can and should be considered during rota design. We do not suggest that it is used to hold either individuals or organisations to account as there is no evidence for it being used in this way. Further work should assess the practicality of designing medical rotas using this tool to minimise fatigue risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63986462019-03-20 Can a tool developed for industry be used to assess fatigue risk in medical rotas? A pilot study of foundation doctors’ rotas in a tertiary centre Cumber, Elspeth Greig, Paul Robert BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and ease of using a pre-existing health and safety executive fatigue risk calculator to assess doctors’ rotas. DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: A large tertiary-referral teaching hospital in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 95 anonymised foundation years 1 and 2 rotas in General Medicine, General Surgery and Emergency Medicine covering a 4-month period. All rotas provided by rota coordinators were included and assessed. INTERVENTIONS: Rotas were assessed for two indices: relative risk of fatigue-related errors compared with a ‘2-day, two-night, four-off’ shift pattern and percentage chance of a high score on a standardised sleepiness scale. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Fatigue index (percentage chance of a high score on a standardised sleepiness scale) and risk index (relative risk of fatigue-related errors compared with a ‘2-day, two-night, four-off’ shift pattern) of all shifts on all rotas. RESULTS: Nearly half of all shifts demonstrated increased risk of fatigue-related errors and increased probability of high levels of sleepiness. There was significant interspeciality variation in both indices. These results are based on rotas as opposed to ‘work as done’ and are therefore likely to slightly universally underestimate actual fatigue risks. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study demonstrates that this tool can be used to compare rotas and guide rota design to minimise risk wherever possible. The calculator guidance clearly states there is no ‘ideal risk’ but that values should be minimised, and a maximum fatigue risk agreed which is deemed acceptable given the nature of work undertaken. This study is intended to demonstrate that fatigue can and should be considered during rota design. We do not suggest that it is used to hold either individuals or organisations to account as there is no evidence for it being used in this way. Further work should assess the practicality of designing medical rotas using this tool to minimise fatigue risk. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6398646/ /pubmed/30772847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023470 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Cumber, Elspeth
Greig, Paul Robert
Can a tool developed for industry be used to assess fatigue risk in medical rotas? A pilot study of foundation doctors’ rotas in a tertiary centre
title Can a tool developed for industry be used to assess fatigue risk in medical rotas? A pilot study of foundation doctors’ rotas in a tertiary centre
title_full Can a tool developed for industry be used to assess fatigue risk in medical rotas? A pilot study of foundation doctors’ rotas in a tertiary centre
title_fullStr Can a tool developed for industry be used to assess fatigue risk in medical rotas? A pilot study of foundation doctors’ rotas in a tertiary centre
title_full_unstemmed Can a tool developed for industry be used to assess fatigue risk in medical rotas? A pilot study of foundation doctors’ rotas in a tertiary centre
title_short Can a tool developed for industry be used to assess fatigue risk in medical rotas? A pilot study of foundation doctors’ rotas in a tertiary centre
title_sort can a tool developed for industry be used to assess fatigue risk in medical rotas? a pilot study of foundation doctors’ rotas in a tertiary centre
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30772847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023470
work_keys_str_mv AT cumberelspeth canatooldevelopedforindustrybeusedtoassessfatigueriskinmedicalrotasapilotstudyoffoundationdoctorsrotasinatertiarycentre
AT greigpaulrobert canatooldevelopedforindustrybeusedtoassessfatigueriskinmedicalrotasapilotstudyoffoundationdoctorsrotasinatertiarycentre