Cargando…

Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation

OBJECTIVES: To identify credible anchor-based minimal important differences (MIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relevant to a BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain. DESIGN: Systematic review. OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimates of anchor-ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Qiukui, Devji, Tahira, Zeraatkar, Dena, Wang, Yuting, Qasim, Anila, Siemieniuk, Reed A C, Vandvik, Per Olav, Lähdeoja, Tuomas, Carrasco-Labra, Alonso, Agoritsas, Thomas, Guyatt, Gordon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028777
_version_ 1783399616171999232
author Hao, Qiukui
Devji, Tahira
Zeraatkar, Dena
Wang, Yuting
Qasim, Anila
Siemieniuk, Reed A C
Vandvik, Per Olav
Lähdeoja, Tuomas
Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
Agoritsas, Thomas
Guyatt, Gordon
author_facet Hao, Qiukui
Devji, Tahira
Zeraatkar, Dena
Wang, Yuting
Qasim, Anila
Siemieniuk, Reed A C
Vandvik, Per Olav
Lähdeoja, Tuomas
Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
Agoritsas, Thomas
Guyatt, Gordon
author_sort Hao, Qiukui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify credible anchor-based minimal important differences (MIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relevant to a BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain. DESIGN: Systematic review. OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimates of anchor-based MIDs, and their credibility, for PROMs judged by the parallel BMJ Rapid Recommendations panel as important for informing their recommendation (pain, function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO up to August 2018. STUDY SELECTION AND REVIEW METHODS: We included original studies of any intervention for shoulder conditions reporting estimates of anchor-based MIDs for relevant PROMs. Two reviewers independently evaluated potentially eligible studies according to predefined selection criteria. Six reviewers, working in pairs, independently extracted data from eligible studies using a predesigned, standardised, pilot-tested extraction form and independently assessed the credibility of included studies using an MID credibility tool. RESULTS: We identified 22 studies involving 5562 patients that reported 74 empirically estimated anchor-based MIDs for 10 candidate instruments to assess shoulder pain, function and HRQoL. We identified MIDs of high credibility for pain and function outcomes and of low credibility for HRQoL. We offered median estimates for the systematic review team who applied these MIDs in Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence summaries and in their interpretations of results in the linked systematic review addressing the effectiveness of surgery for shoulder pain. CONCLUSIONS: Our review provides anchor-based MID estimates, as well as a rating of their credibility, for PROMs for patients with shoulder conditions. The MID estimates inform the interpretation for a linked systematic review and guideline addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain, and could also prove useful for authors addressing other interventions for shoulder problems. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018106531.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63986562019-03-20 Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation Hao, Qiukui Devji, Tahira Zeraatkar, Dena Wang, Yuting Qasim, Anila Siemieniuk, Reed A C Vandvik, Per Olav Lähdeoja, Tuomas Carrasco-Labra, Alonso Agoritsas, Thomas Guyatt, Gordon BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To identify credible anchor-based minimal important differences (MIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relevant to a BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain. DESIGN: Systematic review. OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimates of anchor-based MIDs, and their credibility, for PROMs judged by the parallel BMJ Rapid Recommendations panel as important for informing their recommendation (pain, function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO up to August 2018. STUDY SELECTION AND REVIEW METHODS: We included original studies of any intervention for shoulder conditions reporting estimates of anchor-based MIDs for relevant PROMs. Two reviewers independently evaluated potentially eligible studies according to predefined selection criteria. Six reviewers, working in pairs, independently extracted data from eligible studies using a predesigned, standardised, pilot-tested extraction form and independently assessed the credibility of included studies using an MID credibility tool. RESULTS: We identified 22 studies involving 5562 patients that reported 74 empirically estimated anchor-based MIDs for 10 candidate instruments to assess shoulder pain, function and HRQoL. We identified MIDs of high credibility for pain and function outcomes and of low credibility for HRQoL. We offered median estimates for the systematic review team who applied these MIDs in Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence summaries and in their interpretations of results in the linked systematic review addressing the effectiveness of surgery for shoulder pain. CONCLUSIONS: Our review provides anchor-based MID estimates, as well as a rating of their credibility, for PROMs for patients with shoulder conditions. The MID estimates inform the interpretation for a linked systematic review and guideline addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain, and could also prove useful for authors addressing other interventions for shoulder problems. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018106531. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6398656/ /pubmed/30787096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028777 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Hao, Qiukui
Devji, Tahira
Zeraatkar, Dena
Wang, Yuting
Qasim, Anila
Siemieniuk, Reed A C
Vandvik, Per Olav
Lähdeoja, Tuomas
Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
Agoritsas, Thomas
Guyatt, Gordon
Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
title Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
title_full Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
title_fullStr Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
title_full_unstemmed Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
title_short Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
title_sort minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a bmj rapid recommendation
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028777
work_keys_str_mv AT haoqiukui minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT devjitahira minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT zeraatkardena minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT wangyuting minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT qasimanila minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT siemieniukreedac minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT vandvikperolav minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT lahdeojatuomas minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT carrascolabraalonso minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT agoritsasthomas minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation
AT guyattgordon minimalimportantdifferencesforimprovementinshoulderconditionpatientreportedoutcomesasystematicreviewtoinformabmjrapidrecommendation