Cargando…

GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder: a qualitative interview study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder (PD), and their views on the role of the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme as a support service. DESIGN: In-depth interviews, analysed thematically. PA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: French, Lydia, Moran, Paul, Wiles, Nicola, Kessler, David, Turner, Katrina M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026616
_version_ 1783399618535489536
author French, Lydia
Moran, Paul
Wiles, Nicola
Kessler, David
Turner, Katrina M
author_facet French, Lydia
Moran, Paul
Wiles, Nicola
Kessler, David
Turner, Katrina M
author_sort French, Lydia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder (PD), and their views on the role of the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme as a support service. DESIGN: In-depth interviews, analysed thematically. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen GPs (7 women and 8 men) of varying age and clinical experience, working in practices that differed in terms of the socio-demographic characteristics of their patient populations. SETTING: Twelve general practices based in the West of England, UK. RESULTS: GPs described patients with PD as being challenging to work with and that this work required dedicated time and care. They described experiencing particular difficulty with monitoring their patient’s mental health, as well as having little knowledge about the efficacy or availability of treatments for their attenders with PD. They were aware that this patient population often experienced poor mental health and reported a propensity for them to fall into the gap between primary and secondary mental health services, leaving GPs with little choice but to improvise their own management plans, which occasionally involved funding third-sector treatment options. In terms of IAPT services’ role in managing these patients, GPs wanted shorter waiting times, better inter-agency communication, more highly trained therapists and more treatment options for patients with PD. They also wanted the service to be able to ‘hold’ patients with PD in treatment over a longer period than currently offered. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that, overall, GPs did not consider National Health Service mental health services to offer an effective treatment for patients with PD. While they considered the IAPT programme to be a valuable service for patients with less complex mental health needs, such as depression and anxiety; they felt that the current service provision struggled to meet the needs of patients with more complex mental health needs, as exemplified by people with PD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63986672019-03-20 GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder: a qualitative interview study French, Lydia Moran, Paul Wiles, Nicola Kessler, David Turner, Katrina M BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder (PD), and their views on the role of the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme as a support service. DESIGN: In-depth interviews, analysed thematically. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen GPs (7 women and 8 men) of varying age and clinical experience, working in practices that differed in terms of the socio-demographic characteristics of their patient populations. SETTING: Twelve general practices based in the West of England, UK. RESULTS: GPs described patients with PD as being challenging to work with and that this work required dedicated time and care. They described experiencing particular difficulty with monitoring their patient’s mental health, as well as having little knowledge about the efficacy or availability of treatments for their attenders with PD. They were aware that this patient population often experienced poor mental health and reported a propensity for them to fall into the gap between primary and secondary mental health services, leaving GPs with little choice but to improvise their own management plans, which occasionally involved funding third-sector treatment options. In terms of IAPT services’ role in managing these patients, GPs wanted shorter waiting times, better inter-agency communication, more highly trained therapists and more treatment options for patients with PD. They also wanted the service to be able to ‘hold’ patients with PD in treatment over a longer period than currently offered. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that, overall, GPs did not consider National Health Service mental health services to offer an effective treatment for patients with PD. While they considered the IAPT programme to be a valuable service for patients with less complex mental health needs, such as depression and anxiety; they felt that the current service provision struggled to meet the needs of patients with more complex mental health needs, as exemplified by people with PD. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6398667/ /pubmed/30819713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026616 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
French, Lydia
Moran, Paul
Wiles, Nicola
Kessler, David
Turner, Katrina M
GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder: a qualitative interview study
title GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder: a qualitative interview study
title_full GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder: a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder: a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder: a qualitative interview study
title_short GPs’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder: a qualitative interview study
title_sort gps’ views and experiences of managing patients with personality disorder: a qualitative interview study
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026616
work_keys_str_mv AT frenchlydia gpsviewsandexperiencesofmanagingpatientswithpersonalitydisorderaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT moranpaul gpsviewsandexperiencesofmanagingpatientswithpersonalitydisorderaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT wilesnicola gpsviewsandexperiencesofmanagingpatientswithpersonalitydisorderaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT kesslerdavid gpsviewsandexperiencesofmanagingpatientswithpersonalitydisorderaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT turnerkatrinam gpsviewsandexperiencesofmanagingpatientswithpersonalitydisorderaqualitativeinterviewstudy