Cargando…

Impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether hospital re-accreditation improves quality, patient safety and reliability over three accreditation cycles by testing the accreditation life cycle model on quality measures. DESIGN: The validity of the life cycle model was tested by calibrating interrupted time series...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devkaran, Subashnie, O’Farrell, Patrick N, Ellahham, Samer, Arcangel, Randy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30772852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024514
_version_ 1783399623716503552
author Devkaran, Subashnie
O’Farrell, Patrick N
Ellahham, Samer
Arcangel, Randy
author_facet Devkaran, Subashnie
O’Farrell, Patrick N
Ellahham, Samer
Arcangel, Randy
author_sort Devkaran, Subashnie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether hospital re-accreditation improves quality, patient safety and reliability over three accreditation cycles by testing the accreditation life cycle model on quality measures. DESIGN: The validity of the life cycle model was tested by calibrating interrupted time series (ITS) regression equations for 27 quality measures. The change in the variation of quality over the three accreditation cycles was evaluated using the Levene’s test. SETTING: A 650-bed tertiary academic hospital in Abu Dhabi, UAE. PARTICIPANTS: Each month (over 96 months), a simple random sample of 10% of patient records was selected and audited resulting in a total of 388 800 observations from 14 500 records. INTERVENTION(S): The impact of hospital accreditation on the 27 quality measures was observed for 96 months, 1-year preaccreditation (2007) and 3 years postaccreditation for each of the three accreditation cycles (2008, 2011 and 2014). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The life cycle model was evaluated by aggregating the data for 27 quality measures to produce a composite score (Y(C)) and to fit an ITS regression equation to the unweighted monthly mean of the series. RESULTS: The results provide some evidence for the validity of the four phases of the life cycle namely, the initiation phase, the presurvey phase, the postaccreditation slump and the stagnation phase. Furthermore, the life cycle model explains 87% of the variation in quality compliance measures (R(2)=0.87). The best-fit ITS model contains two significant variables (β(1) and β(3)) (p≤0.001). The Levene’s test (p≤0.05) demonstrated a significant reduction in variation of the quality measures (Y(C)) with subsequent accreditation cycles. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that accreditation has the capacity to sustain improvements over the accreditation cycle. The significant reduction in the variation of the quality measures (Y(C)) with subsequent accreditation cycles indicates that accreditation supports the goal of high reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63986922019-03-20 Impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis Devkaran, Subashnie O’Farrell, Patrick N Ellahham, Samer Arcangel, Randy BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether hospital re-accreditation improves quality, patient safety and reliability over three accreditation cycles by testing the accreditation life cycle model on quality measures. DESIGN: The validity of the life cycle model was tested by calibrating interrupted time series (ITS) regression equations for 27 quality measures. The change in the variation of quality over the three accreditation cycles was evaluated using the Levene’s test. SETTING: A 650-bed tertiary academic hospital in Abu Dhabi, UAE. PARTICIPANTS: Each month (over 96 months), a simple random sample of 10% of patient records was selected and audited resulting in a total of 388 800 observations from 14 500 records. INTERVENTION(S): The impact of hospital accreditation on the 27 quality measures was observed for 96 months, 1-year preaccreditation (2007) and 3 years postaccreditation for each of the three accreditation cycles (2008, 2011 and 2014). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The life cycle model was evaluated by aggregating the data for 27 quality measures to produce a composite score (Y(C)) and to fit an ITS regression equation to the unweighted monthly mean of the series. RESULTS: The results provide some evidence for the validity of the four phases of the life cycle namely, the initiation phase, the presurvey phase, the postaccreditation slump and the stagnation phase. Furthermore, the life cycle model explains 87% of the variation in quality compliance measures (R(2)=0.87). The best-fit ITS model contains two significant variables (β(1) and β(3)) (p≤0.001). The Levene’s test (p≤0.05) demonstrated a significant reduction in variation of the quality measures (Y(C)) with subsequent accreditation cycles. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that accreditation has the capacity to sustain improvements over the accreditation cycle. The significant reduction in the variation of the quality measures (Y(C)) with subsequent accreditation cycles indicates that accreditation supports the goal of high reliability. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6398692/ /pubmed/30772852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024514 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Devkaran, Subashnie
O’Farrell, Patrick N
Ellahham, Samer
Arcangel, Randy
Impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis
title Impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis
title_full Impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis
title_fullStr Impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis
title_short Impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis
title_sort impact of repeated hospital accreditation surveys on quality and reliability, an 8-year interrupted time series analysis
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30772852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024514
work_keys_str_mv AT devkaransubashnie impactofrepeatedhospitalaccreditationsurveysonqualityandreliabilityan8yearinterruptedtimeseriesanalysis
AT ofarrellpatrickn impactofrepeatedhospitalaccreditationsurveysonqualityandreliabilityan8yearinterruptedtimeseriesanalysis
AT ellahhamsamer impactofrepeatedhospitalaccreditationsurveysonqualityandreliabilityan8yearinterruptedtimeseriesanalysis
AT arcangelrandy impactofrepeatedhospitalaccreditationsurveysonqualityandreliabilityan8yearinterruptedtimeseriesanalysis