Cargando…
Using specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase II randomised trial
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) offering patient navigation (PN) to facilitate uptake of bowel scope screening (BSS) among patients who do not confirm or attend their appointment. DESIGN: A single-stage phase II trial. SETTING: South Tyneside Dist...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30772850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023801 |
_version_ | 1783399626742693888 |
---|---|
author | McGregor, Lesley M Skrobanski, Hanna Ritchie, Mary Berkman, Lindy Miller, Hayley Freeman, Madeleine Patel, Nishma Morris, Stephen Rees, Colin von Wagner, Christian |
author_facet | McGregor, Lesley M Skrobanski, Hanna Ritchie, Mary Berkman, Lindy Miller, Hayley Freeman, Madeleine Patel, Nishma Morris, Stephen Rees, Colin von Wagner, Christian |
author_sort | McGregor, Lesley M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) offering patient navigation (PN) to facilitate uptake of bowel scope screening (BSS) among patients who do not confirm or attend their appointment. DESIGN: A single-stage phase II trial. SETTING: South Tyneside District Hospital, Tyne and Wear, England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals invited for BSS at South Tyneside District Hospital during the 6-month recruitment period were invited to participate in the study. INTERVENTION: Consenting individuals were randomly assigned to either the PN intervention or usual care group in a 4:1 ratio. The intervention involved BSS non-attenders receiving a phone call from an SSP to elicit their reasons for non-attendance and offer educational, practical and emotional support as required. If requested by the patient, another BSS appointment was then scheduled. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of non-attenders in the intervention group who were navigated and then rebooked and attended their new BSS appointment. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Barriers to BSS attendance, patient-reported outcomes including informed choice and satisfaction with BSS and the PN intervention, reasons for study non-participation, SSPs’ evaluation of the PN process and a cost analysis. RESULTS: Of those invited to take part (n=1050), 152 (14.5%) were randomised into the study: PN intervention=109; usual care=43. Most participants attended their BSS appointment (PN: 79.8%; control: 79.1%) leaving 22 eligible for PN: only two were successfully contacted. SSPs were confident in delivering PN, but were concerned that low BSS awareness and information overload may have deterred patients from taking part in the study. Difficulty contacting patients was reported as a burden to their workload. CONCLUSIONS: PN, as implemented, was not a feasible intervention to increase BSS uptake in South Tyneside. Interventions to increase BSS awareness may be better suited to this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13314752; Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6398706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63987062019-03-20 Using specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase II randomised trial McGregor, Lesley M Skrobanski, Hanna Ritchie, Mary Berkman, Lindy Miller, Hayley Freeman, Madeleine Patel, Nishma Morris, Stephen Rees, Colin von Wagner, Christian BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) offering patient navigation (PN) to facilitate uptake of bowel scope screening (BSS) among patients who do not confirm or attend their appointment. DESIGN: A single-stage phase II trial. SETTING: South Tyneside District Hospital, Tyne and Wear, England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals invited for BSS at South Tyneside District Hospital during the 6-month recruitment period were invited to participate in the study. INTERVENTION: Consenting individuals were randomly assigned to either the PN intervention or usual care group in a 4:1 ratio. The intervention involved BSS non-attenders receiving a phone call from an SSP to elicit their reasons for non-attendance and offer educational, practical and emotional support as required. If requested by the patient, another BSS appointment was then scheduled. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of non-attenders in the intervention group who were navigated and then rebooked and attended their new BSS appointment. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Barriers to BSS attendance, patient-reported outcomes including informed choice and satisfaction with BSS and the PN intervention, reasons for study non-participation, SSPs’ evaluation of the PN process and a cost analysis. RESULTS: Of those invited to take part (n=1050), 152 (14.5%) were randomised into the study: PN intervention=109; usual care=43. Most participants attended their BSS appointment (PN: 79.8%; control: 79.1%) leaving 22 eligible for PN: only two were successfully contacted. SSPs were confident in delivering PN, but were concerned that low BSS awareness and information overload may have deterred patients from taking part in the study. Difficulty contacting patients was reported as a burden to their workload. CONCLUSIONS: PN, as implemented, was not a feasible intervention to increase BSS uptake in South Tyneside. Interventions to increase BSS awareness may be better suited to this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13314752; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6398706/ /pubmed/30772850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023801 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health McGregor, Lesley M Skrobanski, Hanna Ritchie, Mary Berkman, Lindy Miller, Hayley Freeman, Madeleine Patel, Nishma Morris, Stephen Rees, Colin von Wagner, Christian Using specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase II randomised trial |
title | Using specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase II randomised trial |
title_full | Using specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase II randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Using specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase II randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Using specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase II randomised trial |
title_short | Using specialist screening practitioners (SSPs) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase II randomised trial |
title_sort | using specialist screening practitioners (ssps) to increase uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: results of a feasibility single-stage phase ii randomised trial |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30772850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgregorlesleym usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial AT skrobanskihanna usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial AT ritchiemary usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial AT berkmanlindy usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial AT millerhayley usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial AT freemanmadeleine usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial AT patelnishma usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial AT morrisstephen usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial AT reescolin usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial AT vonwagnerchristian usingspecialistscreeningpractitionerssspstoincreaseuptakeofbowelscopeflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreeningresultsofafeasibilitysinglestagephaseiirandomisedtrial |