Cargando…
Impact of patient information leaflets on doctor–patient communication in the context of acute conditions: a prospective, controlled, before–after study in two French emergency departments
OBJECTIVE: In the context of acute conditions seen in an emergency department, where communication may be difficult, patient information leaflets (PILs) could improve doctor–patient communication (DPC) and may have an impact on other outcomes of the consultation. Our objective was to assess the impa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024184 |
_version_ | 1783399635452166144 |
---|---|
author | Sustersic, Mélanie Tissot, Marisa Tyrant, Julie Gauchet, Aurelie Foote, Alison Vermorel, Céline Bosson, Jean Luc |
author_facet | Sustersic, Mélanie Tissot, Marisa Tyrant, Julie Gauchet, Aurelie Foote, Alison Vermorel, Céline Bosson, Jean Luc |
author_sort | Sustersic, Mélanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In the context of acute conditions seen in an emergency department, where communication may be difficult, patient information leaflets (PILs) could improve doctor–patient communication (DPC) and may have an impact on other outcomes of the consultation. Our objective was to assess the impact of PILs on DPC, patient satisfaction and adherence, and on patient and doctor behaviours. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, before–after trial between November 2013 and June 2015. SETTING: Two French emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS: Adults and adolescents >15 years diagnosed with ankle sprain or an infection (diverticulitis, infectious colitis, pyelonephritis, pneumonia or prostatitis). INTERVENTION: Physicians in the intervention group gave patients a PIL about their condition along with an oral explanation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 7–10 days later, patients were contacted by phone to answer questionnaires. Results were derived from questions scored using a 4-point Likert scale. MAIN FINDINGS: Analysis of the 324 patients showed that PILs improved the mean DPC score (range: 13–52), with 46 (42–49) for 168 patients with PILs vs 44 (38-48) for 156 patients without PILs (p<0.01). The adjusted OR for good communication (having a score >35/52) was 2.54 (1.27 to 5.06). The overall satisfaction and adherence scores did not show significant differences. In contrast, satisfaction with healthcare professionals and timing of medication intake were improved with PILs. The overall satisfaction score improved significantly on per-protocol analysis. When using PILs, doctors prescribed fewer drugs and more examinations (radiology, biology, appointment with a specialist); the need for a new medical consultation for the same pathology was reduced from 32.1% to 17.9% (OR 0.46 [0.27 to 0.77]), particularly revisiting the emergency department. CONCLUSION: In emergency departments, PILs given by doctors improve DPC, increase patients’ satisfaction with healthcare professionals, reduce the number of emergency reconsultations for the same pathology and modify the doctor’s behaviour. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02246361. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6398756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63987562019-03-20 Impact of patient information leaflets on doctor–patient communication in the context of acute conditions: a prospective, controlled, before–after study in two French emergency departments Sustersic, Mélanie Tissot, Marisa Tyrant, Julie Gauchet, Aurelie Foote, Alison Vermorel, Céline Bosson, Jean Luc BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: In the context of acute conditions seen in an emergency department, where communication may be difficult, patient information leaflets (PILs) could improve doctor–patient communication (DPC) and may have an impact on other outcomes of the consultation. Our objective was to assess the impact of PILs on DPC, patient satisfaction and adherence, and on patient and doctor behaviours. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, before–after trial between November 2013 and June 2015. SETTING: Two French emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS: Adults and adolescents >15 years diagnosed with ankle sprain or an infection (diverticulitis, infectious colitis, pyelonephritis, pneumonia or prostatitis). INTERVENTION: Physicians in the intervention group gave patients a PIL about their condition along with an oral explanation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 7–10 days later, patients were contacted by phone to answer questionnaires. Results were derived from questions scored using a 4-point Likert scale. MAIN FINDINGS: Analysis of the 324 patients showed that PILs improved the mean DPC score (range: 13–52), with 46 (42–49) for 168 patients with PILs vs 44 (38-48) for 156 patients without PILs (p<0.01). The adjusted OR for good communication (having a score >35/52) was 2.54 (1.27 to 5.06). The overall satisfaction and adherence scores did not show significant differences. In contrast, satisfaction with healthcare professionals and timing of medication intake were improved with PILs. The overall satisfaction score improved significantly on per-protocol analysis. When using PILs, doctors prescribed fewer drugs and more examinations (radiology, biology, appointment with a specialist); the need for a new medical consultation for the same pathology was reduced from 32.1% to 17.9% (OR 0.46 [0.27 to 0.77]), particularly revisiting the emergency department. CONCLUSION: In emergency departments, PILs given by doctors improve DPC, increase patients’ satisfaction with healthcare professionals, reduce the number of emergency reconsultations for the same pathology and modify the doctor’s behaviour. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02246361. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6398756/ /pubmed/30787085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024184 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Sustersic, Mélanie Tissot, Marisa Tyrant, Julie Gauchet, Aurelie Foote, Alison Vermorel, Céline Bosson, Jean Luc Impact of patient information leaflets on doctor–patient communication in the context of acute conditions: a prospective, controlled, before–after study in two French emergency departments |
title | Impact of patient information leaflets on doctor–patient communication in the context of acute conditions: a prospective, controlled, before–after study in two French emergency departments |
title_full | Impact of patient information leaflets on doctor–patient communication in the context of acute conditions: a prospective, controlled, before–after study in two French emergency departments |
title_fullStr | Impact of patient information leaflets on doctor–patient communication in the context of acute conditions: a prospective, controlled, before–after study in two French emergency departments |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of patient information leaflets on doctor–patient communication in the context of acute conditions: a prospective, controlled, before–after study in two French emergency departments |
title_short | Impact of patient information leaflets on doctor–patient communication in the context of acute conditions: a prospective, controlled, before–after study in two French emergency departments |
title_sort | impact of patient information leaflets on doctor–patient communication in the context of acute conditions: a prospective, controlled, before–after study in two french emergency departments |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sustersicmelanie impactofpatientinformationleafletsondoctorpatientcommunicationinthecontextofacuteconditionsaprospectivecontrolledbeforeafterstudyintwofrenchemergencydepartments AT tissotmarisa impactofpatientinformationleafletsondoctorpatientcommunicationinthecontextofacuteconditionsaprospectivecontrolledbeforeafterstudyintwofrenchemergencydepartments AT tyrantjulie impactofpatientinformationleafletsondoctorpatientcommunicationinthecontextofacuteconditionsaprospectivecontrolledbeforeafterstudyintwofrenchemergencydepartments AT gauchetaurelie impactofpatientinformationleafletsondoctorpatientcommunicationinthecontextofacuteconditionsaprospectivecontrolledbeforeafterstudyintwofrenchemergencydepartments AT footealison impactofpatientinformationleafletsondoctorpatientcommunicationinthecontextofacuteconditionsaprospectivecontrolledbeforeafterstudyintwofrenchemergencydepartments AT vermorelceline impactofpatientinformationleafletsondoctorpatientcommunicationinthecontextofacuteconditionsaprospectivecontrolledbeforeafterstudyintwofrenchemergencydepartments AT bossonjeanluc impactofpatientinformationleafletsondoctorpatientcommunicationinthecontextofacuteconditionsaprospectivecontrolledbeforeafterstudyintwofrenchemergencydepartments |