Cargando…
Cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether an ultrabrief intervention (UBI) improves mental health outcomes for patients in general practice with mild-to-moderate mental health concerns. TRIAL DESIGN: Two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Participants: general practitioners (GPs) were invited...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023481 |
_version_ | 1783399637112061952 |
---|---|
author | Mathieson, Fiona Stanley, James Collings, Catherine (Sunny) Tester, Rachel Dowell, Anthony |
author_facet | Mathieson, Fiona Stanley, James Collings, Catherine (Sunny) Tester, Rachel Dowell, Anthony |
author_sort | Mathieson, Fiona |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether an ultrabrief intervention (UBI) improves mental health outcomes for patients in general practice with mild-to-moderate mental health concerns. TRIAL DESIGN: Two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Participants: general practitioners (GPs) were invited based on working in a participating general practice. Patients were eligible to participate if aged 18–65 years, scored ≤35 on the Kessler-10 (K10) and if meeting local mental health access criteria (based on age, low income or ethnic group). Interventions: intervention arm GPs were trained on the UBI approach, with participating patients receiving three structured appointments over 5 weeks. GPs randomised to practice as usual (PAU) did not receive training, and delivered support following their existing practice approaches. Outcome measures: primary outcome was patient-level K10 score at 6 months postrecruitment. Randomisation: GP practices were randomised to UBI training or PAU at the start of the study. Blinding: GPs were not blinded to group assignment. RESULTS: Numbers randomised: 62 GPs (recruiting 85 patients) were randomised to UBI, and 50 to PAU (recruiting 75 patients). Numbers analysed: 31 GPs recruited at least one patient in the UBI arm (70 patients analysed), and 21 GPs recruited at least one patient in the PAU arm (69 patients analysed). Outcome: K10 scores from an intention-to-treat analysis were similar in UBI and PAU arms, with a wide CI (mean adjusted K10 difference=1.68 points higher in UBI arm, 95% CI −1.18 to 4.55; p=0.255). Secondary outcomes were also similar in the two groups. Conclusions: the UBI intervention did not lead to better outcomes than practice as usual, although the study had lower than planned power due to poor recruitment. The study results can still contribute to the continuing debate about brief psychological therapy options for primary care and their development. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613000041752; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6398763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63987632019-03-20 Cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care Mathieson, Fiona Stanley, James Collings, Catherine (Sunny) Tester, Rachel Dowell, Anthony BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether an ultrabrief intervention (UBI) improves mental health outcomes for patients in general practice with mild-to-moderate mental health concerns. TRIAL DESIGN: Two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Participants: general practitioners (GPs) were invited based on working in a participating general practice. Patients were eligible to participate if aged 18–65 years, scored ≤35 on the Kessler-10 (K10) and if meeting local mental health access criteria (based on age, low income or ethnic group). Interventions: intervention arm GPs were trained on the UBI approach, with participating patients receiving three structured appointments over 5 weeks. GPs randomised to practice as usual (PAU) did not receive training, and delivered support following their existing practice approaches. Outcome measures: primary outcome was patient-level K10 score at 6 months postrecruitment. Randomisation: GP practices were randomised to UBI training or PAU at the start of the study. Blinding: GPs were not blinded to group assignment. RESULTS: Numbers randomised: 62 GPs (recruiting 85 patients) were randomised to UBI, and 50 to PAU (recruiting 75 patients). Numbers analysed: 31 GPs recruited at least one patient in the UBI arm (70 patients analysed), and 21 GPs recruited at least one patient in the PAU arm (69 patients analysed). Outcome: K10 scores from an intention-to-treat analysis were similar in UBI and PAU arms, with a wide CI (mean adjusted K10 difference=1.68 points higher in UBI arm, 95% CI −1.18 to 4.55; p=0.255). Secondary outcomes were also similar in the two groups. Conclusions: the UBI intervention did not lead to better outcomes than practice as usual, although the study had lower than planned power due to poor recruitment. The study results can still contribute to the continuing debate about brief psychological therapy options for primary care and their development. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613000041752; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6398763/ /pubmed/30819700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023481 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Mathieson, Fiona Stanley, James Collings, Catherine (Sunny) Tester, Rachel Dowell, Anthony Cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care |
title | Cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care |
title_full | Cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care |
title_fullStr | Cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care |
title_short | Cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care |
title_sort | cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30819700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023481 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathiesonfiona clusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaguidedselfhelpmentalhealthinterventioninprimarycare AT stanleyjames clusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaguidedselfhelpmentalhealthinterventioninprimarycare AT collingscatherinesunny clusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaguidedselfhelpmentalhealthinterventioninprimarycare AT testerrachel clusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaguidedselfhelpmentalhealthinterventioninprimarycare AT dowellanthony clusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaguidedselfhelpmentalhealthinterventioninprimarycare |