Cargando…

Patient satisfaction in treatment of non-complex fractures and dislocations in general practice in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis and treatment of fractures and dislocations are mostly performed in hospital settings. However, equal care for patients with non-­complex fractures or dislocations (‘minor trauma care’) may be provided in general practice. While substitution of care from secondary to primary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verbeek, Tjitte, Arentsen, Hans, Breet, Evert Jan, Kuipers, Machiel M, Lubbert, Pieter H W, Burger, Huibert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025046
_version_ 1783399644206727168
author Verbeek, Tjitte
Arentsen, Hans
Breet, Evert Jan
Kuipers, Machiel M
Lubbert, Pieter H W
Burger, Huibert
author_facet Verbeek, Tjitte
Arentsen, Hans
Breet, Evert Jan
Kuipers, Machiel M
Lubbert, Pieter H W
Burger, Huibert
author_sort Verbeek, Tjitte
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis and treatment of fractures and dislocations are mostly performed in hospital settings. However, equal care for patients with non-­complex fractures or dislocations (‘minor trauma care’) may be provided in general practice. While substitution of care from secondary to primary care settings is stimulated by governments and insurers, it is unknown what the effects are on patient satisfaction level. Therefore, our primary objective is to determine the effect of minor trauma care delivered in a general practice as compared with a hospital on patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives are to assess the effects on treatment outcomes, cost-effectiveness and time consumption. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a prospective cohort study, we will include 200 patients aged 12 and over with an X-ray confirmed diagnosis of a non­-complex fracture or dislocation out of whom 100 treated in a general practice and 100 in a secondary care hospital, both located in the Netherlands. All treatment procedures and follow-up will be done in accordance to the hospital’s standards of trauma care. Study assessments will be performed pre-treatment, and 1, 6 and 12 weeks after treatment. Data collected include demographics, patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes including physical functioning, complications, pain scores and treatment-related costs. The primary outcome patient satisfaction measured at 12 weeks will be compared between the settings and additionally multivariable regression will be performed to assess potential confounding effects of unbalanced prognostic factors. Treatment outcomes and time consumption will be analysed following the same approach while cost-effectiveness will be assessed using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Subsequently, results will be discussed using focus groups consisting of patients (n=15) and healthcare providers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Ethics Committee from the University Medical Center Groningen reviewed this study protocol and granted exemption from ethical approval (METc UMCG 2017/277). Study results will be presented at (inter)national conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03506958; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63987982019-03-20 Patient satisfaction in treatment of non-complex fractures and dislocations in general practice in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study protocol Verbeek, Tjitte Arentsen, Hans Breet, Evert Jan Kuipers, Machiel M Lubbert, Pieter H W Burger, Huibert BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis and treatment of fractures and dislocations are mostly performed in hospital settings. However, equal care for patients with non-­complex fractures or dislocations (‘minor trauma care’) may be provided in general practice. While substitution of care from secondary to primary care settings is stimulated by governments and insurers, it is unknown what the effects are on patient satisfaction level. Therefore, our primary objective is to determine the effect of minor trauma care delivered in a general practice as compared with a hospital on patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives are to assess the effects on treatment outcomes, cost-effectiveness and time consumption. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a prospective cohort study, we will include 200 patients aged 12 and over with an X-ray confirmed diagnosis of a non­-complex fracture or dislocation out of whom 100 treated in a general practice and 100 in a secondary care hospital, both located in the Netherlands. All treatment procedures and follow-up will be done in accordance to the hospital’s standards of trauma care. Study assessments will be performed pre-treatment, and 1, 6 and 12 weeks after treatment. Data collected include demographics, patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes including physical functioning, complications, pain scores and treatment-related costs. The primary outcome patient satisfaction measured at 12 weeks will be compared between the settings and additionally multivariable regression will be performed to assess potential confounding effects of unbalanced prognostic factors. Treatment outcomes and time consumption will be analysed following the same approach while cost-effectiveness will be assessed using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Subsequently, results will be discussed using focus groups consisting of patients (n=15) and healthcare providers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Ethics Committee from the University Medical Center Groningen reviewed this study protocol and granted exemption from ethical approval (METc UMCG 2017/277). Study results will be presented at (inter)national conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03506958; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6398798/ /pubmed/30782924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025046 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Verbeek, Tjitte
Arentsen, Hans
Breet, Evert Jan
Kuipers, Machiel M
Lubbert, Pieter H W
Burger, Huibert
Patient satisfaction in treatment of non-complex fractures and dislocations in general practice in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study protocol
title Patient satisfaction in treatment of non-complex fractures and dislocations in general practice in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study protocol
title_full Patient satisfaction in treatment of non-complex fractures and dislocations in general practice in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study protocol
title_fullStr Patient satisfaction in treatment of non-complex fractures and dislocations in general practice in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Patient satisfaction in treatment of non-complex fractures and dislocations in general practice in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study protocol
title_short Patient satisfaction in treatment of non-complex fractures and dislocations in general practice in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study protocol
title_sort patient satisfaction in treatment of non-complex fractures and dislocations in general practice in the netherlands: prospective cohort study protocol
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025046
work_keys_str_mv AT verbeektjitte patientsatisfactionintreatmentofnoncomplexfracturesanddislocationsingeneralpracticeinthenetherlandsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT arentsenhans patientsatisfactionintreatmentofnoncomplexfracturesanddislocationsingeneralpracticeinthenetherlandsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT breetevertjan patientsatisfactionintreatmentofnoncomplexfracturesanddislocationsingeneralpracticeinthenetherlandsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT kuipersmachielm patientsatisfactionintreatmentofnoncomplexfracturesanddislocationsingeneralpracticeinthenetherlandsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT lubbertpieterhw patientsatisfactionintreatmentofnoncomplexfracturesanddislocationsingeneralpracticeinthenetherlandsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT burgerhuibert patientsatisfactionintreatmentofnoncomplexfracturesanddislocationsingeneralpracticeinthenetherlandsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol