Cargando…

Cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample

OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that while objective binge eating (OBE) and subjective binge eating (SBE) differ in the amount of food consumed, both are associated with impairment in people with eating disorders. However, only OBE is accounted for in the diagnostic criteria of eating disorders. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Natalie, Mitchison, Deborah, Touyz, Stephen, Hay, Phillipa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024227
_version_ 1783399665843044352
author Li, Natalie
Mitchison, Deborah
Touyz, Stephen
Hay, Phillipa
author_facet Li, Natalie
Mitchison, Deborah
Touyz, Stephen
Hay, Phillipa
author_sort Li, Natalie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that while objective binge eating (OBE) and subjective binge eating (SBE) differ in the amount of food consumed, both are associated with impairment in people with eating disorders. However, only OBE is accounted for in the diagnostic criteria of eating disorders. This study compared the sociodemographic profile and burden of OBE versus SBE at a population level. DESIGN: Population-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 3028 men and women. Participants were categorised into four groups based on their reporting of binge eating in the past 3 months: non-binge eating group (no OBE or SBE), OBE group, SBE group and OSBE group (both OBE and SBE). OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics (age, genderand body mass index, BMI), binge eating, distress, weight/shape overvaluation and health-related quality of life. Groups were compared on sociodemographic information, overvaluation and health-related quality of life. The OBE and SBE groups were also compared on the distress related to binge eating. RESULTS: No differences were found between the SBE group and OBE group in age, gender, BMI, mental health-related quality of life and overvaluation (all p>0.05). However, differences were found in the OSBE participants, namely that they were younger, had a higher mean BMI, lower mental health-related quality of life and higher overvaluation of weight/shape than the non-binge-eating participants (all p<0.001). Proportions of participants who reported distress related to binge eating in the OBE and SBE groups also did not differ (p=0.678). CONCLUSION: There is little difference in the demographic profile or burden of people who engage in OBE versus SBE, supporting the proposed inclusion of SBE in the diagnostic criteria for eating disorders in International Classification of Diseases-11. People who experience both OBE and SBE may experience a relatively higher eating disorder severity and impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6398903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63989032019-03-21 Cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample Li, Natalie Mitchison, Deborah Touyz, Stephen Hay, Phillipa BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that while objective binge eating (OBE) and subjective binge eating (SBE) differ in the amount of food consumed, both are associated with impairment in people with eating disorders. However, only OBE is accounted for in the diagnostic criteria of eating disorders. This study compared the sociodemographic profile and burden of OBE versus SBE at a population level. DESIGN: Population-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 3028 men and women. Participants were categorised into four groups based on their reporting of binge eating in the past 3 months: non-binge eating group (no OBE or SBE), OBE group, SBE group and OSBE group (both OBE and SBE). OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics (age, genderand body mass index, BMI), binge eating, distress, weight/shape overvaluation and health-related quality of life. Groups were compared on sociodemographic information, overvaluation and health-related quality of life. The OBE and SBE groups were also compared on the distress related to binge eating. RESULTS: No differences were found between the SBE group and OBE group in age, gender, BMI, mental health-related quality of life and overvaluation (all p>0.05). However, differences were found in the OSBE participants, namely that they were younger, had a higher mean BMI, lower mental health-related quality of life and higher overvaluation of weight/shape than the non-binge-eating participants (all p<0.001). Proportions of participants who reported distress related to binge eating in the OBE and SBE groups also did not differ (p=0.678). CONCLUSION: There is little difference in the demographic profile or burden of people who engage in OBE versus SBE, supporting the proposed inclusion of SBE in the diagnostic criteria for eating disorders in International Classification of Diseases-11. People who experience both OBE and SBE may experience a relatively higher eating disorder severity and impairment. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6398903/ /pubmed/30787086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024227 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Li, Natalie
Mitchison, Deborah
Touyz, Stephen
Hay, Phillipa
Cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample
title Cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample
title_full Cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample
title_fullStr Cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample
title_short Cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample
title_sort cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6398903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024227
work_keys_str_mv AT linatalie crosssectionalcomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandotherfeaturesinpeoplewithandwithoutobjectiveandsubjectivebingeeatingusingageneralpopulationsample
AT mitchisondeborah crosssectionalcomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandotherfeaturesinpeoplewithandwithoutobjectiveandsubjectivebingeeatingusingageneralpopulationsample
AT touyzstephen crosssectionalcomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandotherfeaturesinpeoplewithandwithoutobjectiveandsubjectivebingeeatingusingageneralpopulationsample
AT hayphillipa crosssectionalcomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandotherfeaturesinpeoplewithandwithoutobjectiveandsubjectivebingeeatingusingageneralpopulationsample