Cargando…
A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips?
Background: Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited cause of endometrial cancer. Identifying individuals affected by Lynch syndrome enables risk-reducing interventions including colorectal surveillance, and cascade testing of relatives. Methods: We conducted a micro-costing study of screening al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00061 |
_version_ | 1783399685020450816 |
---|---|
author | Ryan, Neil A. J. Davison, Niall J. Payne, Katherine Cole, Anne Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. |
author_facet | Ryan, Neil A. J. Davison, Niall J. Payne, Katherine Cole, Anne Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. |
author_sort | Ryan, Neil A. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited cause of endometrial cancer. Identifying individuals affected by Lynch syndrome enables risk-reducing interventions including colorectal surveillance, and cascade testing of relatives. Methods: We conducted a micro-costing study of screening all women with endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome using one of four diagnostic strategies combining tumor microsatellite instability testing (MSI), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or MLH1 methylation testing, and germline next generation sequencing (NGS). Resource use (consumables, capital equipment, and staff) was identified through direct observation and laboratory protocols. Published sources were used to identify unit costs to calculate a per-patient cost (£; 2017) of each testing strategy, assuming a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Results: Tumor triage with MSI and reflex MLH1 methylation testing followed by germline NGS of women with likely Lynch syndrome was the cheapest strategy at £42.01 per case. Tumor triage with IHC and reflex MLH1 methylation testing of MLH1 protein-deficient cancers followed by NGS of women with likely Lynch syndrome cost £45.68. Tumor triage with MSI followed by NGS of all women found to have tumor microsatellite instability cost £78.95. Immediate germline NGS of all women with endometrial cancer cost £176.24. The cost of NGS was affected by the skills and time needed to interpret results (£44.55/patient). Conclusion: This study identified the cost of reflex screening all women with endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome, which can be used in a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis to understand the added value of introducing reflex screening into clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6399107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63991072019-03-12 A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips? Ryan, Neil A. J. Davison, Niall J. Payne, Katherine Cole, Anne Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. Front Oncol Oncology Background: Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited cause of endometrial cancer. Identifying individuals affected by Lynch syndrome enables risk-reducing interventions including colorectal surveillance, and cascade testing of relatives. Methods: We conducted a micro-costing study of screening all women with endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome using one of four diagnostic strategies combining tumor microsatellite instability testing (MSI), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or MLH1 methylation testing, and germline next generation sequencing (NGS). Resource use (consumables, capital equipment, and staff) was identified through direct observation and laboratory protocols. Published sources were used to identify unit costs to calculate a per-patient cost (£; 2017) of each testing strategy, assuming a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Results: Tumor triage with MSI and reflex MLH1 methylation testing followed by germline NGS of women with likely Lynch syndrome was the cheapest strategy at £42.01 per case. Tumor triage with IHC and reflex MLH1 methylation testing of MLH1 protein-deficient cancers followed by NGS of women with likely Lynch syndrome cost £45.68. Tumor triage with MSI followed by NGS of all women found to have tumor microsatellite instability cost £78.95. Immediate germline NGS of all women with endometrial cancer cost £176.24. The cost of NGS was affected by the skills and time needed to interpret results (£44.55/patient). Conclusion: This study identified the cost of reflex screening all women with endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome, which can be used in a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis to understand the added value of introducing reflex screening into clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6399107/ /pubmed/30863719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00061 Text en Copyright © 2019 Ryan, Davison, Payne, Cole, Evans and Crosbie. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Ryan, Neil A. J. Davison, Niall J. Payne, Katherine Cole, Anne Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips? |
title | A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips? |
title_full | A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips? |
title_fullStr | A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips? |
title_full_unstemmed | A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips? |
title_short | A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips? |
title_sort | micro-costing study of screening for lynch syndrome-associated pathogenic variants in an unselected endometrial cancer population: cheap as ngs chips? |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryanneilaj amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT davisonniallj amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT paynekatherine amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT coleanne amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT evansdgareth amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT crosbieemmaj amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT ryanneilaj microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT davisonniallj microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT paynekatherine microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT coleanne microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT evansdgareth microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips AT crosbieemmaj microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips |