Cargando…

A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips?

Background: Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited cause of endometrial cancer. Identifying individuals affected by Lynch syndrome enables risk-reducing interventions including colorectal surveillance, and cascade testing of relatives. Methods: We conducted a micro-costing study of screening al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryan, Neil A. J., Davison, Niall J., Payne, Katherine, Cole, Anne, Evans, D. Gareth, Crosbie, Emma J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00061
_version_ 1783399685020450816
author Ryan, Neil A. J.
Davison, Niall J.
Payne, Katherine
Cole, Anne
Evans, D. Gareth
Crosbie, Emma J.
author_facet Ryan, Neil A. J.
Davison, Niall J.
Payne, Katherine
Cole, Anne
Evans, D. Gareth
Crosbie, Emma J.
author_sort Ryan, Neil A. J.
collection PubMed
description Background: Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited cause of endometrial cancer. Identifying individuals affected by Lynch syndrome enables risk-reducing interventions including colorectal surveillance, and cascade testing of relatives. Methods: We conducted a micro-costing study of screening all women with endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome using one of four diagnostic strategies combining tumor microsatellite instability testing (MSI), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or MLH1 methylation testing, and germline next generation sequencing (NGS). Resource use (consumables, capital equipment, and staff) was identified through direct observation and laboratory protocols. Published sources were used to identify unit costs to calculate a per-patient cost (£; 2017) of each testing strategy, assuming a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Results: Tumor triage with MSI and reflex MLH1 methylation testing followed by germline NGS of women with likely Lynch syndrome was the cheapest strategy at £42.01 per case. Tumor triage with IHC and reflex MLH1 methylation testing of MLH1 protein-deficient cancers followed by NGS of women with likely Lynch syndrome cost £45.68. Tumor triage with MSI followed by NGS of all women found to have tumor microsatellite instability cost £78.95. Immediate germline NGS of all women with endometrial cancer cost £176.24. The cost of NGS was affected by the skills and time needed to interpret results (£44.55/patient). Conclusion: This study identified the cost of reflex screening all women with endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome, which can be used in a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis to understand the added value of introducing reflex screening into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63991072019-03-12 A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips? Ryan, Neil A. J. Davison, Niall J. Payne, Katherine Cole, Anne Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. Front Oncol Oncology Background: Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited cause of endometrial cancer. Identifying individuals affected by Lynch syndrome enables risk-reducing interventions including colorectal surveillance, and cascade testing of relatives. Methods: We conducted a micro-costing study of screening all women with endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome using one of four diagnostic strategies combining tumor microsatellite instability testing (MSI), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or MLH1 methylation testing, and germline next generation sequencing (NGS). Resource use (consumables, capital equipment, and staff) was identified through direct observation and laboratory protocols. Published sources were used to identify unit costs to calculate a per-patient cost (£; 2017) of each testing strategy, assuming a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Results: Tumor triage with MSI and reflex MLH1 methylation testing followed by germline NGS of women with likely Lynch syndrome was the cheapest strategy at £42.01 per case. Tumor triage with IHC and reflex MLH1 methylation testing of MLH1 protein-deficient cancers followed by NGS of women with likely Lynch syndrome cost £45.68. Tumor triage with MSI followed by NGS of all women found to have tumor microsatellite instability cost £78.95. Immediate germline NGS of all women with endometrial cancer cost £176.24. The cost of NGS was affected by the skills and time needed to interpret results (£44.55/patient). Conclusion: This study identified the cost of reflex screening all women with endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome, which can be used in a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis to understand the added value of introducing reflex screening into clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6399107/ /pubmed/30863719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00061 Text en Copyright © 2019 Ryan, Davison, Payne, Cole, Evans and Crosbie. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Ryan, Neil A. J.
Davison, Niall J.
Payne, Katherine
Cole, Anne
Evans, D. Gareth
Crosbie, Emma J.
A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips?
title A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips?
title_full A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips?
title_fullStr A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips?
title_full_unstemmed A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips?
title_short A Micro-Costing Study of Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Pathogenic Variants in an Unselected Endometrial Cancer Population: Cheap as NGS Chips?
title_sort micro-costing study of screening for lynch syndrome-associated pathogenic variants in an unselected endometrial cancer population: cheap as ngs chips?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30863719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00061
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanneilaj amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT davisonniallj amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT paynekatherine amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT coleanne amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT evansdgareth amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT crosbieemmaj amicrocostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT ryanneilaj microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT davisonniallj microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT paynekatherine microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT coleanne microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT evansdgareth microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips
AT crosbieemmaj microcostingstudyofscreeningforlynchsyndromeassociatedpathogenicvariantsinanunselectedendometrialcancerpopulationcheapasngschips