Cargando…

Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes

PURPOSE: Deciding whether to re-operate patients with intracranial tumor recurrence or remnant is challenging, as the data on safety of repeated procedures is limited. This study set out to evaluate the risks for morbidity, mortality, and complications after repeated operations, and to compare those...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zattra, Costanza Maria, Zhang, David Y., Broggi, Morgan, Velz, Julia, Vasella, Flavio, Seggewiss, Dominik, Schiavolin, Silvia, Bozinov, Oliver, Krayenbühl, Niklaus, Sarnthein, Johannes, Ferroli, Paolo, Regli, Luca, Stienen, Martin N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30474767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03058-y
_version_ 1783399700788936704
author Zattra, Costanza Maria
Zhang, David Y.
Broggi, Morgan
Velz, Julia
Vasella, Flavio
Seggewiss, Dominik
Schiavolin, Silvia
Bozinov, Oliver
Krayenbühl, Niklaus
Sarnthein, Johannes
Ferroli, Paolo
Regli, Luca
Stienen, Martin N.
author_facet Zattra, Costanza Maria
Zhang, David Y.
Broggi, Morgan
Velz, Julia
Vasella, Flavio
Seggewiss, Dominik
Schiavolin, Silvia
Bozinov, Oliver
Krayenbühl, Niklaus
Sarnthein, Johannes
Ferroli, Paolo
Regli, Luca
Stienen, Martin N.
author_sort Zattra, Costanza Maria
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Deciding whether to re-operate patients with intracranial tumor recurrence or remnant is challenging, as the data on safety of repeated procedures is limited. This study set out to evaluate the risks for morbidity, mortality, and complications after repeated operations, and to compare those to primary operations. METHODS: Retrospective observational two-center study on consecutive patients undergoing microsurgical tumor resection. The data derived from independent, prospective institutional registries. The primary endpoint was morbidity at 3 months (M3), defined as significant decrease on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary endpoints were mortality, rate and severity of complications according to the Clavien–Dindo Grade (CDG). RESULTS: 463/2403 (19.3%) were repeated procedures. Morbidity at M3 occurred in n = 290 patients (12.1%). In univariable analysis, patients undergoing repeated surgery were 98% as likely as patients undergoing primary surgery to experience morbidity (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72–1.34, p = 0.889). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor size, histology and posterior fossa location, the relationship remained stable (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 0.90–1.73, p = 0.186). Mortality was n = 10 (0.4%) at discharge and n = 95 (4.0%) at M3, without group differences. At least one complication occurred in n = 855, and the rate (35.5% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.892) and severity (CDG; p = 0.520) was similar after primary and repeated procedures. Results were reproduced in subgroup analyses for meningiomas, gliomas and cerebral metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated surgery for intracranial tumors does not increase the risk of morbidity. Mortality, and both the rate and severity of complications are comparable to primary operations. This information is of value for patient counseling and the informed consent process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03058-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63991742019-03-22 Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes Zattra, Costanza Maria Zhang, David Y. Broggi, Morgan Velz, Julia Vasella, Flavio Seggewiss, Dominik Schiavolin, Silvia Bozinov, Oliver Krayenbühl, Niklaus Sarnthein, Johannes Ferroli, Paolo Regli, Luca Stienen, Martin N. J Neurooncol Clinical Study PURPOSE: Deciding whether to re-operate patients with intracranial tumor recurrence or remnant is challenging, as the data on safety of repeated procedures is limited. This study set out to evaluate the risks for morbidity, mortality, and complications after repeated operations, and to compare those to primary operations. METHODS: Retrospective observational two-center study on consecutive patients undergoing microsurgical tumor resection. The data derived from independent, prospective institutional registries. The primary endpoint was morbidity at 3 months (M3), defined as significant decrease on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary endpoints were mortality, rate and severity of complications according to the Clavien–Dindo Grade (CDG). RESULTS: 463/2403 (19.3%) were repeated procedures. Morbidity at M3 occurred in n = 290 patients (12.1%). In univariable analysis, patients undergoing repeated surgery were 98% as likely as patients undergoing primary surgery to experience morbidity (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72–1.34, p = 0.889). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor size, histology and posterior fossa location, the relationship remained stable (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 0.90–1.73, p = 0.186). Mortality was n = 10 (0.4%) at discharge and n = 95 (4.0%) at M3, without group differences. At least one complication occurred in n = 855, and the rate (35.5% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.892) and severity (CDG; p = 0.520) was similar after primary and repeated procedures. Results were reproduced in subgroup analyses for meningiomas, gliomas and cerebral metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated surgery for intracranial tumors does not increase the risk of morbidity. Mortality, and both the rate and severity of complications are comparable to primary operations. This information is of value for patient counseling and the informed consent process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03058-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-11-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6399174/ /pubmed/30474767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03058-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Zattra, Costanza Maria
Zhang, David Y.
Broggi, Morgan
Velz, Julia
Vasella, Flavio
Seggewiss, Dominik
Schiavolin, Silvia
Bozinov, Oliver
Krayenbühl, Niklaus
Sarnthein, Johannes
Ferroli, Paolo
Regli, Luca
Stienen, Martin N.
Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes
title Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes
title_full Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes
title_fullStr Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes
title_short Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes
title_sort repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30474767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03058-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zattracostanzamaria repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT zhangdavidy repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT broggimorgan repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT velzjulia repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT vasellaflavio repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT seggewissdominik repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT schiavolinsilvia repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT bozinovoliver repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT krayenbuhlniklaus repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT sarntheinjohannes repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT ferrolipaolo repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT regliluca repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes
AT stienenmartinn repeatedcraniotomiesforintracranialtumorsistheriskincreasedpooledanalysisoftwoprospectiveinstitutionalregistriesofcomplicationsandoutcomes