Cargando…
Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography
INTRODUCTION: Digital radiography lacks visual clues of exposure techniques used to obtain radiographs, therefore manufacturers have included exposure indicators (EIs). EIs provides feedback about exposure techniques used and evaluating EIs will yield much needed information about exposure trends us...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.317 |
_version_ | 1783399704706416640 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Shantel Pieterse, Tracey Lawrence, Heather |
author_facet | Lewis, Shantel Pieterse, Tracey Lawrence, Heather |
author_sort | Lewis, Shantel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Digital radiography lacks visual clues of exposure techniques used to obtain radiographs, therefore manufacturers have included exposure indicators (EIs). EIs provides feedback about exposure techniques used and evaluating EIs will yield much needed information about exposure trends used in digital radiography. METHODS: A retrospective explorative quantitative study was conducted at nine randomly selected imaging departments in Gauteng, South Africa. Data pertaining to EI was retrospectively collected using quota sampling and compared to manufacturer recommended (MR) standards. RESULTS: A total of 1422 EIs were collected. 50% of these were within the MR standard. 27% of EI indicated overexposure and 23% indicated underexposure. CONCLUSIONS: Greater evidence of overexposure was noted in the retrospective analysis of the EI. This pilot study shows the need for further investigation into exposure technique practices in digital radiography and the need for measures to halt the evidenced overexposure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6399191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63991912019-03-14 Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography Lewis, Shantel Pieterse, Tracey Lawrence, Heather J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Digital radiography lacks visual clues of exposure techniques used to obtain radiographs, therefore manufacturers have included exposure indicators (EIs). EIs provides feedback about exposure techniques used and evaluating EIs will yield much needed information about exposure trends used in digital radiography. METHODS: A retrospective explorative quantitative study was conducted at nine randomly selected imaging departments in Gauteng, South Africa. Data pertaining to EI was retrospectively collected using quota sampling and compared to manufacturer recommended (MR) standards. RESULTS: A total of 1422 EIs were collected. 50% of these were within the MR standard. 27% of EI indicated overexposure and 23% indicated underexposure. CONCLUSIONS: Greater evidence of overexposure was noted in the retrospective analysis of the EI. This pilot study shows the need for further investigation into exposure technique practices in digital radiography and the need for measures to halt the evidenced overexposure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-04 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6399191/ /pubmed/30834686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.317 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Lewis, Shantel Pieterse, Tracey Lawrence, Heather Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography |
title | Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography |
title_full | Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography |
title_fullStr | Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography |
title_short | Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography |
title_sort | retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewisshantel retrospectiveevaluationofexposureindicatorsapilotstudyofexposuretechniqueindigitalradiography AT pietersetracey retrospectiveevaluationofexposureindicatorsapilotstudyofexposuretechniqueindigitalradiography AT lawrenceheather retrospectiveevaluationofexposureindicatorsapilotstudyofexposuretechniqueindigitalradiography |