Cargando…

Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography

INTRODUCTION: Digital radiography lacks visual clues of exposure techniques used to obtain radiographs, therefore manufacturers have included exposure indicators (EIs). EIs provides feedback about exposure techniques used and evaluating EIs will yield much needed information about exposure trends us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Shantel, Pieterse, Tracey, Lawrence, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.317
_version_ 1783399704706416640
author Lewis, Shantel
Pieterse, Tracey
Lawrence, Heather
author_facet Lewis, Shantel
Pieterse, Tracey
Lawrence, Heather
author_sort Lewis, Shantel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Digital radiography lacks visual clues of exposure techniques used to obtain radiographs, therefore manufacturers have included exposure indicators (EIs). EIs provides feedback about exposure techniques used and evaluating EIs will yield much needed information about exposure trends used in digital radiography. METHODS: A retrospective explorative quantitative study was conducted at nine randomly selected imaging departments in Gauteng, South Africa. Data pertaining to EI was retrospectively collected using quota sampling and compared to manufacturer recommended (MR) standards. RESULTS: A total of 1422 EIs were collected. 50% of these were within the MR standard. 27% of EI indicated overexposure and 23% indicated underexposure. CONCLUSIONS: Greater evidence of overexposure was noted in the retrospective analysis of the EI. This pilot study shows the need for further investigation into exposure technique practices in digital radiography and the need for measures to halt the evidenced overexposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63991912019-03-14 Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography Lewis, Shantel Pieterse, Tracey Lawrence, Heather J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Digital radiography lacks visual clues of exposure techniques used to obtain radiographs, therefore manufacturers have included exposure indicators (EIs). EIs provides feedback about exposure techniques used and evaluating EIs will yield much needed information about exposure trends used in digital radiography. METHODS: A retrospective explorative quantitative study was conducted at nine randomly selected imaging departments in Gauteng, South Africa. Data pertaining to EI was retrospectively collected using quota sampling and compared to manufacturer recommended (MR) standards. RESULTS: A total of 1422 EIs were collected. 50% of these were within the MR standard. 27% of EI indicated overexposure and 23% indicated underexposure. CONCLUSIONS: Greater evidence of overexposure was noted in the retrospective analysis of the EI. This pilot study shows the need for further investigation into exposure technique practices in digital radiography and the need for measures to halt the evidenced overexposure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-04 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6399191/ /pubmed/30834686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.317 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lewis, Shantel
Pieterse, Tracey
Lawrence, Heather
Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography
title Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography
title_full Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography
title_fullStr Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography
title_short Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography
title_sort retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.317
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisshantel retrospectiveevaluationofexposureindicatorsapilotstudyofexposuretechniqueindigitalradiography
AT pietersetracey retrospectiveevaluationofexposureindicatorsapilotstudyofexposuretechniqueindigitalradiography
AT lawrenceheather retrospectiveevaluationofexposureindicatorsapilotstudyofexposuretechniqueindigitalradiography