Cargando…

Improvement of radiographer commenting accuracy of the appendicular skeleton following a short course in plain radiography image interpretation: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION: Radiographers are at times required to provide preliminary information on plain radiography when significant findings are identified. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two short training modules to improve the accuracy of image interpretation of the appendicular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Imelda, Baird, Marilyn, Pearce, Beverley, Schneider, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30302949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.306
_version_ 1783399704932909056
author Williams, Imelda
Baird, Marilyn
Pearce, Beverley
Schneider, Michal
author_facet Williams, Imelda
Baird, Marilyn
Pearce, Beverley
Schneider, Michal
author_sort Williams, Imelda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Radiographers are at times required to provide preliminary information on plain radiography when significant findings are identified. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two short training modules to improve the accuracy of image interpretation of the appendicular skeleton amongst a group of radiographers. METHODS: Eight radiographers volunteered to participate in the study. All undertook a pre‐test and, following delivery of course materials, an immediate post‐test for two consecutive modules. A retention test was undertaken 6 months later. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and accuracy (Acc) scores were evaluated against the “Gold Standard” radiologists’ reports. Paired‐samples t‐tests were carried out to compare image interpretation scores between the start of module one to the end of module two, and between the end of module 2 and 6 months later. Summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) scores on each of the participants’ module two post‐test study results were undertaken. RESULTS: Significant improvements in scores were achieved between the mean (SD) scores of module 1 pre‐test (77.5 (±3.9)) and the module 2 post‐test (83.6 (±3.2) (P =0.022)). Sn, Sp and Acc scores increased from the start of module 1 pre‐test to the end of module 2 post‐test (Sn: 82.28–86.25%; Sp: 75.29–84.66%; Acc: 81.68–85.97%). The retention test revealed a non‐significant reduction in mean scores (80.0 (±5.1)) when compared to post‐test module 2 (83.6 (±3.2) (P =0.184)). SROC revealed an area under the curve of 0.90. CONCLUSION: Participants achieved significant improvements in commenting accuracy on plain radiography of the appendicular skeleton after completion of the two modules. However, continuous application and ongoing professional development is essential in order to maintain and develop the skills acquired.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63991922019-03-14 Improvement of radiographer commenting accuracy of the appendicular skeleton following a short course in plain radiography image interpretation: A pilot study Williams, Imelda Baird, Marilyn Pearce, Beverley Schneider, Michal J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Radiographers are at times required to provide preliminary information on plain radiography when significant findings are identified. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two short training modules to improve the accuracy of image interpretation of the appendicular skeleton amongst a group of radiographers. METHODS: Eight radiographers volunteered to participate in the study. All undertook a pre‐test and, following delivery of course materials, an immediate post‐test for two consecutive modules. A retention test was undertaken 6 months later. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and accuracy (Acc) scores were evaluated against the “Gold Standard” radiologists’ reports. Paired‐samples t‐tests were carried out to compare image interpretation scores between the start of module one to the end of module two, and between the end of module 2 and 6 months later. Summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) scores on each of the participants’ module two post‐test study results were undertaken. RESULTS: Significant improvements in scores were achieved between the mean (SD) scores of module 1 pre‐test (77.5 (±3.9)) and the module 2 post‐test (83.6 (±3.2) (P =0.022)). Sn, Sp and Acc scores increased from the start of module 1 pre‐test to the end of module 2 post‐test (Sn: 82.28–86.25%; Sp: 75.29–84.66%; Acc: 81.68–85.97%). The retention test revealed a non‐significant reduction in mean scores (80.0 (±5.1)) when compared to post‐test module 2 (83.6 (±3.2) (P =0.184)). SROC revealed an area under the curve of 0.90. CONCLUSION: Participants achieved significant improvements in commenting accuracy on plain radiography of the appendicular skeleton after completion of the two modules. However, continuous application and ongoing professional development is essential in order to maintain and develop the skills acquired. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-09 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6399192/ /pubmed/30302949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.306 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Williams, Imelda
Baird, Marilyn
Pearce, Beverley
Schneider, Michal
Improvement of radiographer commenting accuracy of the appendicular skeleton following a short course in plain radiography image interpretation: A pilot study
title Improvement of radiographer commenting accuracy of the appendicular skeleton following a short course in plain radiography image interpretation: A pilot study
title_full Improvement of radiographer commenting accuracy of the appendicular skeleton following a short course in plain radiography image interpretation: A pilot study
title_fullStr Improvement of radiographer commenting accuracy of the appendicular skeleton following a short course in plain radiography image interpretation: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Improvement of radiographer commenting accuracy of the appendicular skeleton following a short course in plain radiography image interpretation: A pilot study
title_short Improvement of radiographer commenting accuracy of the appendicular skeleton following a short course in plain radiography image interpretation: A pilot study
title_sort improvement of radiographer commenting accuracy of the appendicular skeleton following a short course in plain radiography image interpretation: a pilot study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30302949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.306
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsimelda improvementofradiographercommentingaccuracyoftheappendicularskeletonfollowingashortcourseinplainradiographyimageinterpretationapilotstudy
AT bairdmarilyn improvementofradiographercommentingaccuracyoftheappendicularskeletonfollowingashortcourseinplainradiographyimageinterpretationapilotstudy
AT pearcebeverley improvementofradiographercommentingaccuracyoftheappendicularskeletonfollowingashortcourseinplainradiographyimageinterpretationapilotstudy
AT schneidermichal improvementofradiographercommentingaccuracyoftheappendicularskeletonfollowingashortcourseinplainradiographyimageinterpretationapilotstudy