Cargando…

Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests

For a reliable visual test, it is important to evaluate the legibility of the symbols, which depends on several factors. Previous studies have compared the legibility of Latin optotypes. This study developed a visual function test based on identification visual capacity for a Chinese reading populat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai, Li-Ting, Jang, Yuh, Liao, Kuo-Meng, Chen, Chien-Chung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30833715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39408-7
_version_ 1783399735132946432
author Tsai, Li-Ting
Jang, Yuh
Liao, Kuo-Meng
Chen, Chien-Chung
author_facet Tsai, Li-Ting
Jang, Yuh
Liao, Kuo-Meng
Chen, Chien-Chung
author_sort Tsai, Li-Ting
collection PubMed
description For a reliable visual test, it is important to evaluate the legibility of the symbols, which depends on several factors. Previous studies have compared the legibility of Latin optotypes. This study developed a visual function test based on identification visual capacity for a Chinese reading population. The legibility of word symbols was assessed with three methods: (1) Identification of the contrast thresholds of the character sets, (2) patterns of confusion matrices obtained from analysis of the frequency of incorrect stimulus/response pairs, and (3) pixel ratios of bitmap images of Chinese characters. Then characters of similar legibility in each character set were selected. The contrast thresholds of the final five character sets and the Tumbling E and Landolt C optotypes were evaluated. No significant differences in contrast threshold were found among the five selected character sets (p > 0.05), but the contrast thresholds were significantly higher than those of the E and C optotypes. Our results indicate that combining multiple methods to include the influences of the properties of visual stimuli would be useful in investigating the legibility of visual word symbols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6399319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63993192019-03-07 Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests Tsai, Li-Ting Jang, Yuh Liao, Kuo-Meng Chen, Chien-Chung Sci Rep Article For a reliable visual test, it is important to evaluate the legibility of the symbols, which depends on several factors. Previous studies have compared the legibility of Latin optotypes. This study developed a visual function test based on identification visual capacity for a Chinese reading population. The legibility of word symbols was assessed with three methods: (1) Identification of the contrast thresholds of the character sets, (2) patterns of confusion matrices obtained from analysis of the frequency of incorrect stimulus/response pairs, and (3) pixel ratios of bitmap images of Chinese characters. Then characters of similar legibility in each character set were selected. The contrast thresholds of the final five character sets and the Tumbling E and Landolt C optotypes were evaluated. No significant differences in contrast threshold were found among the five selected character sets (p > 0.05), but the contrast thresholds were significantly higher than those of the E and C optotypes. Our results indicate that combining multiple methods to include the influences of the properties of visual stimuli would be useful in investigating the legibility of visual word symbols. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6399319/ /pubmed/30833715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39408-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tsai, Li-Ting
Jang, Yuh
Liao, Kuo-Meng
Chen, Chien-Chung
Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests
title Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests
title_full Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests
title_fullStr Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests
title_full_unstemmed Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests
title_short Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests
title_sort legibility assessment of visual word form symbols for visual tests
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30833715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39408-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tsailiting legibilityassessmentofvisualwordformsymbolsforvisualtests
AT jangyuh legibilityassessmentofvisualwordformsymbolsforvisualtests
AT liaokuomeng legibilityassessmentofvisualwordformsymbolsforvisualtests
AT chenchienchung legibilityassessmentofvisualwordformsymbolsforvisualtests