Cargando…
Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests
For a reliable visual test, it is important to evaluate the legibility of the symbols, which depends on several factors. Previous studies have compared the legibility of Latin optotypes. This study developed a visual function test based on identification visual capacity for a Chinese reading populat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30833715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39408-7 |
_version_ | 1783399735132946432 |
---|---|
author | Tsai, Li-Ting Jang, Yuh Liao, Kuo-Meng Chen, Chien-Chung |
author_facet | Tsai, Li-Ting Jang, Yuh Liao, Kuo-Meng Chen, Chien-Chung |
author_sort | Tsai, Li-Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | For a reliable visual test, it is important to evaluate the legibility of the symbols, which depends on several factors. Previous studies have compared the legibility of Latin optotypes. This study developed a visual function test based on identification visual capacity for a Chinese reading population. The legibility of word symbols was assessed with three methods: (1) Identification of the contrast thresholds of the character sets, (2) patterns of confusion matrices obtained from analysis of the frequency of incorrect stimulus/response pairs, and (3) pixel ratios of bitmap images of Chinese characters. Then characters of similar legibility in each character set were selected. The contrast thresholds of the final five character sets and the Tumbling E and Landolt C optotypes were evaluated. No significant differences in contrast threshold were found among the five selected character sets (p > 0.05), but the contrast thresholds were significantly higher than those of the E and C optotypes. Our results indicate that combining multiple methods to include the influences of the properties of visual stimuli would be useful in investigating the legibility of visual word symbols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6399319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63993192019-03-07 Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests Tsai, Li-Ting Jang, Yuh Liao, Kuo-Meng Chen, Chien-Chung Sci Rep Article For a reliable visual test, it is important to evaluate the legibility of the symbols, which depends on several factors. Previous studies have compared the legibility of Latin optotypes. This study developed a visual function test based on identification visual capacity for a Chinese reading population. The legibility of word symbols was assessed with three methods: (1) Identification of the contrast thresholds of the character sets, (2) patterns of confusion matrices obtained from analysis of the frequency of incorrect stimulus/response pairs, and (3) pixel ratios of bitmap images of Chinese characters. Then characters of similar legibility in each character set were selected. The contrast thresholds of the final five character sets and the Tumbling E and Landolt C optotypes were evaluated. No significant differences in contrast threshold were found among the five selected character sets (p > 0.05), but the contrast thresholds were significantly higher than those of the E and C optotypes. Our results indicate that combining multiple methods to include the influences of the properties of visual stimuli would be useful in investigating the legibility of visual word symbols. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6399319/ /pubmed/30833715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39408-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Tsai, Li-Ting Jang, Yuh Liao, Kuo-Meng Chen, Chien-Chung Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests |
title | Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests |
title_full | Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests |
title_fullStr | Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests |
title_short | Legibility Assessment of Visual Word Form Symbols for Visual Tests |
title_sort | legibility assessment of visual word form symbols for visual tests |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6399319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30833715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39408-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsailiting legibilityassessmentofvisualwordformsymbolsforvisualtests AT jangyuh legibilityassessmentofvisualwordformsymbolsforvisualtests AT liaokuomeng legibilityassessmentofvisualwordformsymbolsforvisualtests AT chenchienchung legibilityassessmentofvisualwordformsymbolsforvisualtests |